1.Transtubular Anterior Cervical Foraminotomy for the Treatment of Compressive Cervical Radiculopathy: Surgical Results and Complications in a Consecutive Series of Cases
Rodolfo MADURI ; Giulia COSSU ; Viviana AURELI ; Sonia Plaza WÜTHRICH ; Lukas BOBINSKI ; John Michael DUFF
Asian Spine Journal 2021;15(5):673-681
Methods:
The chart review recorded clinical and radiological features preoperatively and postoperatively and at follow-up (FU). The effect of prognostic factors was analyzed in relation to the clinical outcome.
Results:
Between January 2004 and October 2019, 45 patients (15 females and 30 males) with a mean age of 55.9 years (range, 28–78 years) underwent ACF for unilateral cervical radiculopathy. The global clinical outcome according to the MacNab scale was evaluated as excellent in 64.5% of patients (n=29), good in 28.9% (n=13), fair in 4.4% (n=2), and poor in 2.2% (n=1). The radiological FU was available for 73.3% (n=33). The statistical analysis revealed no influence of age, sex, operated level, and side on the clinical outcome. Only one patient (2.2%) exhibited spontaneous bone fusion at the operated level on FU after a right-sided C6–7 ACF with no clinical consequences. No patient presented with signs of delayed segmental instability. The overall reoperation rate of this series was 4.4%.
Conclusions
ACF is a feasible and low-cost alternative to ACDF in selected patients with cervical radiculopathy. The use of tubular retractors in ACF may confer an added advantage that creates a safe corridor for direct cervical root decompression yet minimizing surrounding soft tissue retraction and avoiding unnecessary bone removal.
2.The Burden of Agoraphobia in Worsening Quality of Life in a Community Survey in Italy
Antonio PRETI ; Martina PIRAS ; Giulia COSSU ; Elisa PINTUS ; Mirra PINTUS ; Goce KALCEV ; Federico CABRAS ; Maria Francesca MORO ; Ferdinando ROMANO ; Matteo BALESTRIERI ; Filippo CARACI ; Liliana DELL’OSSO ; Guido Di SCIASCIO ; Filippo DRAGO ; Maria Carolina HARDOY ; Rita RONCONE ; Carlo FARAVELLI ; Mario MUSU ; Gabriele FINCO ; Antonio Egidio NARDI ; Mauro Giovanni CARTA
Psychiatry Investigation 2021;18(4):277-283
Objective:
Current nosology redefined agoraphobia as an autonomous diagnosis distinct from panic disorder. We investigated the lifetime prevalence of agoraphobia, its association with other mental disorders, and its impact on the health-related quality of life (HR-QoL).
Methods:
Community survey in 2,338 randomly selected adult subjects. Participants were interviewed with the Advanced Neuropsychiatric Tools and Assessment Schedule (ANTAS), administered by clinicians. The diagnoses were based on the ICD-10 criteria. The Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) was used to quantify HR-QoL.
Results:
In the sample, 35 subjects met the criteria for agoraphobia (1.5%), with greater prevalence among women (2.0%) than men (0.9%): odds ratio (OR) 2.23; 95% CI: 1.0-5–2. Agoraphobia was more often seen among those with (n=26; 1.1%) than without (n=9; 0.4%) panic disorder: OR=8.3; 2.9–24.4. Co-morbidity with other mental disorders was substantial. The mean score of SF-12 in people with agoraphobia was 35.2±7.8, with similar levels of HR-QoL in people with (35.3±7.9) or without (34.8±7.3) panic disorder: ANOVA: F(1;33)=0.0; p=1.00.
Conclusion
One out of seventy people may suffer from agoraphobia in their lifetime. The attributable burden in terms of HR-QoL is substantial and comparable to the one observed for chronic mental disorders such as major depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, or obsessive-compulsive disorder.
3.The Burden of Agoraphobia in Worsening Quality of Life in a Community Survey in Italy
Antonio PRETI ; Martina PIRAS ; Giulia COSSU ; Elisa PINTUS ; Mirra PINTUS ; Goce KALCEV ; Federico CABRAS ; Maria Francesca MORO ; Ferdinando ROMANO ; Matteo BALESTRIERI ; Filippo CARACI ; Liliana DELL’OSSO ; Guido Di SCIASCIO ; Filippo DRAGO ; Maria Carolina HARDOY ; Rita RONCONE ; Carlo FARAVELLI ; Mario MUSU ; Gabriele FINCO ; Antonio Egidio NARDI ; Mauro Giovanni CARTA
Psychiatry Investigation 2021;18(4):277-283
Objective:
Current nosology redefined agoraphobia as an autonomous diagnosis distinct from panic disorder. We investigated the lifetime prevalence of agoraphobia, its association with other mental disorders, and its impact on the health-related quality of life (HR-QoL).
Methods:
Community survey in 2,338 randomly selected adult subjects. Participants were interviewed with the Advanced Neuropsychiatric Tools and Assessment Schedule (ANTAS), administered by clinicians. The diagnoses were based on the ICD-10 criteria. The Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) was used to quantify HR-QoL.
Results:
In the sample, 35 subjects met the criteria for agoraphobia (1.5%), with greater prevalence among women (2.0%) than men (0.9%): odds ratio (OR) 2.23; 95% CI: 1.0-5–2. Agoraphobia was more often seen among those with (n=26; 1.1%) than without (n=9; 0.4%) panic disorder: OR=8.3; 2.9–24.4. Co-morbidity with other mental disorders was substantial. The mean score of SF-12 in people with agoraphobia was 35.2±7.8, with similar levels of HR-QoL in people with (35.3±7.9) or without (34.8±7.3) panic disorder: ANOVA: F(1;33)=0.0; p=1.00.
Conclusion
One out of seventy people may suffer from agoraphobia in their lifetime. The attributable burden in terms of HR-QoL is substantial and comparable to the one observed for chronic mental disorders such as major depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, or obsessive-compulsive disorder.