1.Complete Mesocolic Excision With Central Vascular Ligation in Comparison With Conventional Surgery for Patients With Colon Cancer – The Experiences at Two Centers.
Mohamed ABDELKHALEK ; Ahmed SETIT ; Francesco BIANCO ; Andrea BELLI ; Adel DENEWER ; Tamer Fady YOUSSEF ; Armando FALATO ; Giovanni Maria ROMANO
Annals of Coloproctology 2018;34(4):180-186
PURPOSE: Revolutions have occurred over the last 3 decades in the management of patients with colorectal cancer. Most advances were in rectal cancer surgery, especially after the introduction of the total mesorectal excision (TME) by Heald. However, no parallel advances regarding colon cancer surgeries have occurred. In 2009, Hohenberger introduced a new concept trying to translate the survival advantages of TME to patients with colon cancer. This relatively new concept of a complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) in the management of patients with colon cancer represents an evolution in operative technique. We performed a comparative study between CME with CVL and conventional surgery for patients with colon cancer at Italian and Egyptian cancer centers, considering surgical quality and clinical outcome. METHODS: Seventy-nine Egyptian patients underwent conventional surgery (non-CME group) while 52 Italian patients underwent CME with sharp dissection between the embryological planes and CVL of the supplying vessels (CME group). RESULTS: Significantly better results were observed in terms of lymph node yield (CME group: 22.5 vs. non-CME group: 12; P < 0.0001) and lymph node ratio (CME group: 0.03 vs. non-CME group: 0.22; P < 0.0001). Regarding surgical morbidity, no significant difference was noted (CME group: 2 vs. non-CME group: 5; P < 0.702). CONCLUSION: CME appears to be a safe procedure when performed by experienced hands through proper embryological planes. It also provides a superior specimen, with a higher lymph node yield, which consequently affects the lymph node ratio. Eventually, CME with CVL should be increasingly adopted and studied more deeply.
Colon*
;
Colonic Neoplasms*
;
Colorectal Neoplasms
;
Hand
;
Humans
;
Ligation*
;
Lymph Nodes
;
Mesocolon
;
Rectal Neoplasms
2.Mesenchymal Stem Cells from the Wharton's Jelly of the Human Umbilical Cord: Biological Properties and Therapeutic Potential
Luigi MARINO ; Maria Antonietta CASTALDI ; Rosa ROSAMILIO ; Enrico RAGNI ; Rosa VITOLO ; Caterina FULGIONE ; Salvatore Giovanni CASTALDI ; Bianca SERIO ; Rosario BIANCO ; Maurizio GUIDA ; Carmine SELLERI
International Journal of Stem Cells 2019;12(2):218-226
Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem cells (WJ-MSCs) are a class of stem cells with high differentiative potential, an immuno-privileged status and easy access for collection, which raise no legal or ethical issues. WJ-MSCs exhibit several features of embryonic stem cells, both in the phenotypic and genetic aspects, with only a few differences, such as a shorter doubling time and a more extensive ex vivo expansion capacity. WJ-MSCs have immunomodulatory properties, involving both innate and adaptive immune responses. This review focuses on the role of WJ-MSCs in the management of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), a life-threatening complication of the allogenic transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Different studies documented the beneficial effect of the infusion of WJ-MSCs, even when not fully HLA identical, in patients with severe GvHD, refractory to standard treatment. Finally, we summarized current ongoing clinical trials with WJ-MSCs and their potential in regenerative medicine.
Embryonic Stem Cells
;
Ethics
;
Graft vs Host Disease
;
Hematopoietic Stem Cells
;
Humans
;
Immunomodulation
;
Mesenchymal Stromal Cells
;
Regenerative Medicine
;
Stem Cells
;
Umbilical Cord
;
Wharton Jelly
3.Etiology, 3-Month Functional Outcome and Recurrent Events in Non-Traumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Martina B. GOELDLIN ; Achim MUELLER ; Bernhard M. SIEPEN ; Madlaine MUELLER ; Davide STRAMBO ; Patrik MICHEL ; Michael SCHAERER ; Carlo W. CEREDA ; Giovanni BIANCO ; Florian LINDHEIMER ; Christian BERGER ; Friedrich MEDLIN ; Roland BACKHAUS ; Nils PETERS ; Susanne RENAUD ; Loraine FISCH ; Julien NIEDERHAEUSER ; Emmanuel CARRERA ; Elisabeth DIRREN ; Christophe BONVIN ; Rolf STURZENEGGER ; Timo KAHLES ; Krassen NEDELTCHEV ; Georg KAEGI ; Jochen VEHOFF ; Biljana RODIC ; Manuel BOLOGNESE ; Ludwig SCHELOSKY ; Stephan SALMEN ; Marie-Luise MONO ; Alexandros A. POLYMERIS ; Stefan T. ENGELTER ; Philippe LYRER ; Susanne WEGENER ; Andreas R. LUFT ; Werner Z’GRAGGEN ; David BERVINI ; Bastian VOLBERS ; Tomas DOBROCKY ; Johannes KAESMACHER ; Pasquale MORDASINI ; Thomas R. MEINEL ; Marcel ARNOLD ; Javier FANDINO ; Leo H. BONATI ; Urs FISCHER ; David J. SEIFFGE ;
Journal of Stroke 2022;24(2):266-277
Background:
and Purpose Knowledge about different etiologies of non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and their outcomes is scarce.
Methods:
We assessed prevalence of pre-specified ICH etiologies and their association with outcomes in consecutive ICH patients enrolled in the prospective Swiss Stroke Registry (2014 to 2019). Results We included 2,650 patients (mean±standard deviation age 72±14 years, 46.5% female, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 8 [interquartile range, 3 to 15]). Etiology was as follows: hypertension, 1,238 (46.7%); unknown, 566 (21.4%); antithrombotic therapy, 227 (8.6%); cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), 217 (8.2%); macrovascular cause, 128 (4.8%); other determined etiology, 274 patients (10.3%). At 3 months, 880 patients (33.2%) were functionally independent and 664 had died (25.1%). ICH due to hypertension had a higher odds of functional independence (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 1.77; P=0.05) and lower mortality (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.86; P=0.003). ICH due to antithrombotic therapy had higher mortality (aOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.61; P=0.045). Within 3 months, 4.2% of patients had cerebrovascular events. The rate of ischemic stroke was higher than that of recurrent ICH in all etiologies but CAA and unknown etiology. CAA had high odds of recurrent ICH (aOR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.48 to 7.69; P=0.004) while the odds was lower in ICH due to hypertension (aOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.93; P=0.031).
Conclusions
Although hypertension is the leading etiology of ICH, other etiologies are frequent. One-third of ICH patients are functionally independent at 3 months. Except for patients with presumed CAA, the risk of ischemic stroke within 3 months of ICH was higher than the risk of recurrent hemorrhage.