1.Impedance-detected Symptom Association and Number of Reflux Episodes as Pre-treatment Parameters That Predict Outcomes of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Patients.
Edoardo SAVARINO ; Giorgia BODINI ; Elisa MARABOTTO ; Vincenzo SAVARINO
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2015;21(2):292-293
No abstract available.
Gastroesophageal Reflux*
;
Humans
2.Not All Patients With Non-erosive Reflux Disease Share Psychological Distress as Main Mechanism of Disease.
Edoardo SAVARINO ; Patrizia ZENTILIN ; Manuele FURNARI ; Giorgia BODINI ; Elisa MARABOTTO ; Vincenzo SAVARINO
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2014;20(1):129-130
No abstract available.
Humans
3.The Lyon Consensus: Does It Differ From the Previous Ones?
Matteo GHISA ; Brigida BARBERIO ; Vincenzo SAVARINO ; Elisa MARABOTTO ; Mentore RIBOLSI ; Giorgia BODINI ; Fabiana ZINGONE ; Marzio FRAZZONI ; Edoardo SAVARINO
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2020;26(3):311-321
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a complex disorder with heterogeneous symptoms and a multifaceted pathogenetic basis, which prevent a simple diagnostic algorithm or any categorical classification. Clinical history, questionnaires and response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy are insufficient tools to make a conclusive diagnosis of GERD and further investigations are frequently required. The Lyon Consensus goes beyond the previous classifications and defines endoscopic and functional parameters able to establish the presence of GERD. Evidences for reflux include high-grade erosive esophagitis, Barrett’s esophagus, and peptic strictures at endoscopy as well as esophageal acid exposure time > 6% on pH-metry or combined pH-impedance monitoring. Even if a normal endoscopy does not exclude GERD, its combination with distal acid exposure time < 4% on off-PPI pH-impedance monitoring provides sufficient evidence refuting this diagnosis. Reflux-symptom association on pH-monitoring provides supportive evidence for reflux-triggered symptoms and may predict a better treatment outcome, when present. Also recommendations to perform pH-impedance “on” or “off” PPI are well depicted. When endoscopy and pH-metry or combined pH-impedance monitoring are inconclusive, adjunctive evidence from biopsy findings (eg, microscopic esophagitis), high-resolution manometry (ie, ineffective esophagogastric barrier and esophageal body hypomotility), and novel impedance metrics, such as mean nocturnal baseline impedance and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index, can contribute to better identify patients with GERD. Definition of individual patient phenotype, based on the level of refluxate exposure, mechanism of reflux, efficacy of clearance, underlying anatomy of the esophagogastric junction, and clinical presentation, will lead to manage GERD patients with a tailored approach chosen among different types of therapy.