Objective: We aimed to compare cerebral beta-amyloid protein (Aβ) positivity rate and amyloid accumulation pattern on amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) between mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subtypes, i.e. amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and non-amnestic mild cognitive impairment (naMCI). Methods: The study participants were 34 naMCI patients and age-, sex- and education-matched 68 aMCI patients (1:2 ratio) who visited the Dementia and Age-Associated Cognitive Decline Clinic of the Seoul National University Hospital. All participants received comprehensive clinical and neuropsychological assessments and [18F] florbetaben PET. Results: Aβ positivity rate of naMCI group (26.5%) was significantly lower than that of aMCI group (64.7%). Among Aβ positive individuals, there was no difference in Aβ accumulation pattern between naMCI and aMCI. Conclusion The findings suggest that MCI subtypes based on impaired cognitive domains have a differential association with brain Aβ deposition, a core pathology of AD. Amnestic subtype of MCI are more closely associated with cerebral Aβ deposition compared to nonamnestic subtype. In contrast, the pattern of amyloid deposition does not appear to have any difference between the subtypes.

Background: Transfusion reactions have been under-reported, and the laboratory tests to evaluate the causes of the reactions are unfamiliar to physicians other than transfusion specialists. The paper-based transfusion reaction reporting system previously used in our hospital was one-way, with physicians submitting it to the Department of Transfusion Management. To address this, we developed an electronic reporting system that improves communication with physicians to identify the cause of transfusion reactions and recommend appropriate blood components. Methods: To assess the status of transfusion reaction reporting, transfusion reaction reports and transfusion nursing records of 5 years from 2019 to 2023 were analyzed. The transfusion reaction reporting system comprises two parts: the physician's report and the response from the Department of Transfusion Management. If physicians order blood products for patients with a history of prior transfusion reactions, a pop-up alert appears, warning them to check the details of the previous report. Results: From 2019 to 2023, 2.5% cases of transfusion-related symptoms occurred annually and only 2.6% of transfusion reactions were reported. In 21 out of the 31 cases, the cause was difficult to determine due to inadequate laboratory tests.The attending physicians of 12 cases were given a recommendation to use blood products or to conduct further laboratory tests by the Department of Transfusion Management to reduce recurrence, but the advice was followed only in 4 cases. Conclusion The electronic transfusion reaction reporting system could help physicians conduct appropriate investigations for transfusion reactions and inform physicians regarding the laboratory tests required to be undertaken. It is expected to enhance blood transfusion safety and management by improving communication with physicians.

Background: Transfusion reactions have been under-reported, and the laboratory tests to evaluate the causes of the reactions are unfamiliar to physicians other than transfusion specialists. The paper-based transfusion reaction reporting system previously used in our hospital was one-way, with physicians submitting it to the Department of Transfusion Management. To address this, we developed an electronic reporting system that improves communication with physicians to identify the cause of transfusion reactions and recommend appropriate blood components. Methods: To assess the status of transfusion reaction reporting, transfusion reaction reports and transfusion nursing records of 5 years from 2019 to 2023 were analyzed. The transfusion reaction reporting system comprises two parts: the physician's report and the response from the Department of Transfusion Management. If physicians order blood products for patients with a history of prior transfusion reactions, a pop-up alert appears, warning them to check the details of the previous report. Results: From 2019 to 2023, 2.5% cases of transfusion-related symptoms occurred annually and only 2.6% of transfusion reactions were reported. In 21 out of the 31 cases, the cause was difficult to determine due to inadequate laboratory tests.The attending physicians of 12 cases were given a recommendation to use blood products or to conduct further laboratory tests by the Department of Transfusion Management to reduce recurrence, but the advice was followed only in 4 cases. Conclusion The electronic transfusion reaction reporting system could help physicians conduct appropriate investigations for transfusion reactions and inform physicians regarding the laboratory tests required to be undertaken. It is expected to enhance blood transfusion safety and management by improving communication with physicians.

Background: Transfusion reactions have been under-reported, and the laboratory tests to evaluate the causes of the reactions are unfamiliar to physicians other than transfusion specialists. The paper-based transfusion reaction reporting system previously used in our hospital was one-way, with physicians submitting it to the Department of Transfusion Management. To address this, we developed an electronic reporting system that improves communication with physicians to identify the cause of transfusion reactions and recommend appropriate blood components. Methods: To assess the status of transfusion reaction reporting, transfusion reaction reports and transfusion nursing records of 5 years from 2019 to 2023 were analyzed. The transfusion reaction reporting system comprises two parts: the physician's report and the response from the Department of Transfusion Management. If physicians order blood products for patients with a history of prior transfusion reactions, a pop-up alert appears, warning them to check the details of the previous report. Results: From 2019 to 2023, 2.5% cases of transfusion-related symptoms occurred annually and only 2.6% of transfusion reactions were reported. In 21 out of the 31 cases, the cause was difficult to determine due to inadequate laboratory tests.The attending physicians of 12 cases were given a recommendation to use blood products or to conduct further laboratory tests by the Department of Transfusion Management to reduce recurrence, but the advice was followed only in 4 cases. Conclusion The electronic transfusion reaction reporting system could help physicians conduct appropriate investigations for transfusion reactions and inform physicians regarding the laboratory tests required to be undertaken. It is expected to enhance blood transfusion safety and management by improving communication with physicians.

Background: Transfusion reactions have been under-reported, and the laboratory tests to evaluate the causes of the reactions are unfamiliar to physicians other than transfusion specialists. The paper-based transfusion reaction reporting system previously used in our hospital was one-way, with physicians submitting it to the Department of Transfusion Management. To address this, we developed an electronic reporting system that improves communication with physicians to identify the cause of transfusion reactions and recommend appropriate blood components. Methods: To assess the status of transfusion reaction reporting, transfusion reaction reports and transfusion nursing records of 5 years from 2019 to 2023 were analyzed. The transfusion reaction reporting system comprises two parts: the physician's report and the response from the Department of Transfusion Management. If physicians order blood products for patients with a history of prior transfusion reactions, a pop-up alert appears, warning them to check the details of the previous report. Results: From 2019 to 2023, 2.5% cases of transfusion-related symptoms occurred annually and only 2.6% of transfusion reactions were reported. In 21 out of the 31 cases, the cause was difficult to determine due to inadequate laboratory tests.The attending physicians of 12 cases were given a recommendation to use blood products or to conduct further laboratory tests by the Department of Transfusion Management to reduce recurrence, but the advice was followed only in 4 cases. Conclusion The electronic transfusion reaction reporting system could help physicians conduct appropriate investigations for transfusion reactions and inform physicians regarding the laboratory tests required to be undertaken. It is expected to enhance blood transfusion safety and management by improving communication with physicians.

Objective: We intended to investigate the relationships between visual sensory impairment (VSI) or auditory sensory impairment (ASI) and brain pathological changes associated with cognitive decline in older adults. Methods: We primarily tried to examine whether each sensory impairment is related to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology, specifically beta-amyloid (Aβ) deposition, through both cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches in cognitively unimpaired older adults. Self-report questionnaires on vision and hearing status were administered at the baseline.Neuroimaging scans including brain [ 11 C] Pittsburgh Compound B PET and MRI, as well as clinical assessments, were performed at baseline and 2-year follow-up. Results: Cross-sectional analyses showed that the VSI-positive group had significantly higher Aβ deposition than the VSI-negative group, whereas there was no significant association between ASI positivity and Aβ deposition. Longitudinal analyses revealed that VSI positivity at baseline was significantly associated with increased Aβ deposition over 2 years (β = 0.153, p = 0.025), although ASI positivity was not (β = 0.045, p = 0.518). VSI positivity at baseline was also significantly associated with greater atrophic changes in AD-related brain regions over the 2-year follow-up period (β = −0.207, p = 0.005), whereas ASI positivity was not (β = 0.024, p = 0.753). Neither VSI nor ASI positivity was related to cerebrovascular injury, as measured based on the white matter hyperintensity volume. Conclusion The findings suggest that VSI is probably related to AD-specific pathological changes, which possibly mediate the reported relationship between VSI and cognitive decline. In contrast, ASI appears not associated with AD pathologies but may contribute to cognitive decline via other mechanisms.

Objective: Previous studies have reported that vitamin D deficiency increased the risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia in older adults. However, little is known about how vitamin D is involved in the pathophysiology of AD. Thus, this study aimed to examine the association and interaction of serum vitamin D levels with in vivo AD pathologies including cerebral beta-amyloid (Aβ) deposition and neurodegeneration in nondemented older adults. Methods: 428 Nondemented older adults were recruited from the Korean Brain Aging Study for the Early Diagnosis and Prediction of Alzheimer’s Disease, a prospective cohort that began in 2014. All participants underwent comprehensive clinical assessments, measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D), and multimodal brain imaging including Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Global PiB deposition was measured for the Aβ biomarker. Intracranial volume-adjusted hippocampal volume (HVa) was used as a neurodegeneration biomarker. Results: Overall, serum 25(OH)D level was not associated with either Aβ deposition or HVa after controlling for age, sex, apolipoprotein E ε4 positivity, and vascular risk factors. However, serum 25(OH)D level had a significant moderating effect on the association between Aβ and neurodegeneration, with lower serum 25(OH)D level significantly exacerbating cerebral Aβ-associated hippocampal volume loss (B = 34.612, p = 0.008). Conclusion Our findings indicate that lower serum vitamin D levels may contribute to AD by exacerbating Aβ-associated neurodegeneration in nondemented older adults. Further studies to explore the potential therapeutic effect of vitamin D supplementation on the progression of AD pathology will be necessary.

Objective: We intended to investigate the relationships between visual sensory impairment (VSI) or auditory sensory impairment (ASI) and brain pathological changes associated with cognitive decline in older adults. Methods: We primarily tried to examine whether each sensory impairment is related to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology, specifically beta-amyloid (Aβ) deposition, through both cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches in cognitively unimpaired older adults. Self-report questionnaires on vision and hearing status were administered at the baseline.Neuroimaging scans including brain [ 11 C] Pittsburgh Compound B PET and MRI, as well as clinical assessments, were performed at baseline and 2-year follow-up. Results: Cross-sectional analyses showed that the VSI-positive group had significantly higher Aβ deposition than the VSI-negative group, whereas there was no significant association between ASI positivity and Aβ deposition. Longitudinal analyses revealed that VSI positivity at baseline was significantly associated with increased Aβ deposition over 2 years (β = 0.153, p = 0.025), although ASI positivity was not (β = 0.045, p = 0.518). VSI positivity at baseline was also significantly associated with greater atrophic changes in AD-related brain regions over the 2-year follow-up period (β = −0.207, p = 0.005), whereas ASI positivity was not (β = 0.024, p = 0.753). Neither VSI nor ASI positivity was related to cerebrovascular injury, as measured based on the white matter hyperintensity volume. Conclusion The findings suggest that VSI is probably related to AD-specific pathological changes, which possibly mediate the reported relationship between VSI and cognitive decline. In contrast, ASI appears not associated with AD pathologies but may contribute to cognitive decline via other mechanisms.

Objective: Previous studies have reported that vitamin D deficiency increased the risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia in older adults. However, little is known about how vitamin D is involved in the pathophysiology of AD. Thus, this study aimed to examine the association and interaction of serum vitamin D levels with in vivo AD pathologies including cerebral beta-amyloid (Aβ) deposition and neurodegeneration in nondemented older adults. Methods: 428 Nondemented older adults were recruited from the Korean Brain Aging Study for the Early Diagnosis and Prediction of Alzheimer’s Disease, a prospective cohort that began in 2014. All participants underwent comprehensive clinical assessments, measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D), and multimodal brain imaging including Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Global PiB deposition was measured for the Aβ biomarker. Intracranial volume-adjusted hippocampal volume (HVa) was used as a neurodegeneration biomarker. Results: Overall, serum 25(OH)D level was not associated with either Aβ deposition or HVa after controlling for age, sex, apolipoprotein E ε4 positivity, and vascular risk factors. However, serum 25(OH)D level had a significant moderating effect on the association between Aβ and neurodegeneration, with lower serum 25(OH)D level significantly exacerbating cerebral Aβ-associated hippocampal volume loss (B = 34.612, p = 0.008). Conclusion Our findings indicate that lower serum vitamin D levels may contribute to AD by exacerbating Aβ-associated neurodegeneration in nondemented older adults. Further studies to explore the potential therapeutic effect of vitamin D supplementation on the progression of AD pathology will be necessary.

Objective: We intended to investigate the relationships between visual sensory impairment (VSI) or auditory sensory impairment (ASI) and brain pathological changes associated with cognitive decline in older adults. Methods: We primarily tried to examine whether each sensory impairment is related to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology, specifically beta-amyloid (Aβ) deposition, through both cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches in cognitively unimpaired older adults. Self-report questionnaires on vision and hearing status were administered at the baseline.Neuroimaging scans including brain [ 11 C] Pittsburgh Compound B PET and MRI, as well as clinical assessments, were performed at baseline and 2-year follow-up. Results: Cross-sectional analyses showed that the VSI-positive group had significantly higher Aβ deposition than the VSI-negative group, whereas there was no significant association between ASI positivity and Aβ deposition. Longitudinal analyses revealed that VSI positivity at baseline was significantly associated with increased Aβ deposition over 2 years (β = 0.153, p = 0.025), although ASI positivity was not (β = 0.045, p = 0.518). VSI positivity at baseline was also significantly associated with greater atrophic changes in AD-related brain regions over the 2-year follow-up period (β = −0.207, p = 0.005), whereas ASI positivity was not (β = 0.024, p = 0.753). Neither VSI nor ASI positivity was related to cerebrovascular injury, as measured based on the white matter hyperintensity volume. Conclusion The findings suggest that VSI is probably related to AD-specific pathological changes, which possibly mediate the reported relationship between VSI and cognitive decline. In contrast, ASI appears not associated with AD pathologies but may contribute to cognitive decline via other mechanisms.