1.Postoperative radiotherapy for mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the major salivary glands: long-term results of a single-institution experience
Radiation Oncology Journal 2018;36(4):317-324
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term survival outcomes and prognostic factors that affect the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent surgery and postoperative radiotherapy for major salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 44 patients who underwent surgery followed by radiotherapy for primary MEC of the major salivary glands between 1991 and 2014. The median follow-up period was 9.8 years (range, 0.8 to 23.8 years). RESULTS: The overall outcomes at 5 and 10 years were 81.5% and 78.0% for overall survival (OS), 86.2% and 83.4% for disease-free survival, 90.6% and 87.6% for locoregional recurrence-free survival, and both 90.5% for distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Histologic grade was the only independent predictor of OS (low vs. intermediate vs. high; hazard ratio = 3.699; p = 0.041) in multivariate analysis. A poorer survival was observed among patients with high-grade tumors compared with those with non-high-grade tumors (5-year OS, 37.5% vs. 91.7%, p < 0.001; 5-year DMFS, 46.9% vs. 100%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy resulted in excellent survival outcomes for patients with major salivary gland MEC. However, high-grade tumors contributed to poor DMFS and OS. Additional aggressive strategies for improving survival outcomes should be developed for high-grade MEC.
Carcinoma, Mucoepidermoid
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Radiotherapy
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Salivary Gland Neoplasms
;
Salivary Glands
2.The Preliminary Results of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Tonsillar Cancer.
Geumju PARK ; Sang Wook LEE ; Eun Kyung CHOI ; Jong Hoon KIM ; Si Yeol SONG ; Sang Min YOUN ; Sung Ho PARK ; Dong Wook PARK ; Seung Do AHN
The Journal of the Korean Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology 2009;27(3):120-125
PURPOSE: We wanted to present the preliminary results of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for the treatment of tonsillar cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 12 patients who underwent IMRT for tonsillar cancer at Asan Medical Center between November 2002 and February 2007. Seven patients (58%) received definitive treatment, and five (42%) were treated in the postoperative setting. Among the definitively treated patients, 6 patients received cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens. Simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART) was used in nine patients. The prescribed dose was 72 Gy at 2.4 Gy/fraction for the definitively treated cases and 61.6 Gy at 2.2 Gy/fraction for the postoperative cases. The median follow-up period was 34 months. RESULTS: All twelve patients completed treatment without interruption, and eleven showed a complete response. One patient had persistent loco-regional disease after treatment. The three-year estimates of loco-regional control, disease-free survival and overall survival were 91.7%, 91.7%, and 100%. The worst acute mucositis was Grade 1 in four patients, Grade 2 in five patients, Grade 3 in two patients and Grade 4 in one patient. Grade 3 xerostomia was observed in six patients. CONCLUSION: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was shown to be a safe and effective treatment modality for tonsillar cancer. Further studies with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up period are needed to evaluate the ultimate tumor control and late toxicity of IMRT for treating tonsillar cancer.
Disease-Free Survival
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Mucositis
;
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Tonsillar Neoplasms
;
Xerostomia
3.The value of prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: should it always be recommended?
Minji KOH ; Si Yeol SONG ; Ji Hwan JO ; Geumju PARK ; Jae Won PARK ; Su Ssan KIM ; Eun Kyung CHOI
Radiation Oncology Journal 2019;37(3):156-165
PURPOSE: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is a standard treatment for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) showing a response to initial treatment, but many patients do not receive PCI due to comorbidities or refusal. This study aims to define the patient group for whom PCI can be omitted with minimal risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with LS-SCLC who underwent radiotherapy with curative aim at our institution between January 2004 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who did not receive PCI were evaluated for brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors for survival, and treatment outcomes were compared with a patient cohort who received PCI. RESULTS: A total of 350 patients achieved a response following thoracic radiotherapy, and 190 of these patients did not receive PCI. Stage I–II and a complete response (CR) to initial therapy were good prognostic factors for BMFS and OS on univariate analysis. Patients with both stage I–II and a CR who declined PCI showed comparable 2-year BMFS to those who received PCI (92% vs. 89%). In patients who achieved CR, PCI did not significantly improve OS or PFS. CONCLUSION: There should be less concern about omitting PCI in patients with comorbidities if they have stage I–II or a CR, with brain metastasis control being comparable to those patients who receive PCI.
Brain
;
Cohort Studies
;
Comorbidity
;
Cranial Irradiation
;
Disease-Free Survival
;
Humans
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Radiotherapy
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma