INTRODUCTIONHand infections in patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRF) are more diffi cult to treat and have had the worse outcomes. This paper examines the epidemiology, bacteriology and outcomes of surgically managed upper limb infections in these vulnerable patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODSAll patients from a single centre with surgically-managed upper limb infections between 2001 and 2007 were reviewed. We collected epidemiological data on demographics, type and site of infection, bacteriology, surgical treatment, complications and mortality.

RESULTSForty-seven out of 803 (6%) patients with surgically managed upper limb infections in the study period had ESRF. The average age was 59 years. ESRF was secondary to diabetes in 88% of cases. Patients presented on average 7 days after onset of symptoms. Abscesses (34%), wet gangrene (26%) and osteomyelitis (11%) were the commonest infections. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was the commonest pathogen (29%), occurring either in isolation or with other organisms. Eighteen percent of single organisms cultured were gram-negative. Multiple organisms occurred in 29%. A median of 2 operations were required. Thirty-six percent of all cases required amputation. Twenty-fi ve percent of patients had a life-threatening event (myocardial infarction or septic shock) during treatment.

CONCLUSIONSESRF patients present late with severe upper limb infections. Nosocomial infections are common. Initial empirical antibiotic treatment should cover MRSA and gram-negative bacteria. Immediate referral to a hand surgery unit is recommended. Multi-disciplinary management of the patient with input from physicians and anaesthetists or intensivists in the perioperative period is necessary to optimise the patient for surgery and to manage active medical comorbidities and complications after surgery.

Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Amputation ; Diabetes Complications ; Epidemiologic Studies ; Female ; Hand ; surgery ; Hand Injuries ; epidemiology ; etiology ; surgery ; Humans ; Kidney Failure, Chronic ; complications ; epidemiology ; Male ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Singapore ; epidemiology ; Surgical Wound Infection ; drug therapy ; epidemiology ; etiology

INTRODUCTIONIntra-articular fractures of the distal radius represent high energy, complex, unstable injuries and the optimal method of treatment remains controversial.

MATERIALS AND METHODSThe aim of the paper is to compare the outcomes of external fixation (EF) with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with plates and screw fixation in the treatment of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius. Thirty-five patients were enlisted from December 2003 to September 2005 after a failure of initial conservative treatment. The patients were randomised into EF or ORIF groups. The patients were followed-up at 1 week, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Clinical and radiological outcomes were measured. They were scored using the Green and O'Brien or the Gartland and Wertley score.

RESULTSOf the 35 patients, 5 defaulted the 6-month follow-up and were excluded. We found that the clinical and radiological outcomes for the 2 groups were not significantly different. Complication rates were also similar.

CONCLUSIONThere is no significant difference in the outcome of intra-articular distal radius fractures treated with either EF or ORIF.

Adult ; Bone Plates ; Bone Screws ; External Fixators ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radiography ; Radius Fractures ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Recovery of Function ; Wrist Injuries ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Young Adult