Objective:To investigate the influencing factors for the number of lymph node harvested after Da Vinci robotic and laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Methods:The retrospective case-control study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 1 396 patients who underwent Da Vinci robotic or laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from December 2014 to July 2019 were collected. There were 991 males and 405 females, aged (60±11) years. Surgery using Da Vinci robotic system or laparoscopic system was completed according to patients' wishes. Cases with early gastric cancer underwent D 1+ lymphadenectomy and cases with advanced gastric cancer underwent standard D 2 lymphadenectomy. Observation indicators: (1) intraoperative situations; (2) postoperative situations; (3) influencing factors for the number of lymph node harvested after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer; (4) follow-up and survival. Follow-up using outpatient examination or telephone interview was performed to detect survival of patients up to October 2020. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD. Univariate analysis was done using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. Multivariate analysis was performed using Logistic regression model. The survival rate was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Results:(1) Intraoperative situations: all the 1 396 patients underwent radical gastrectomy, including 415 cases undergoing Da Vinci robotic radical gastrectomy and 981 cases undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. Thirty-five of the 1 396 patients were converted to open surgery, including 5 cases undergoing Da Vinci robotic radical gastrectomy and 30 cases undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. Of the 1 396 patients, 983 cases underwent distal gastrectomy, 400 cases underwent total gastrectomy and 13 cases underwent proximal gastrectomy, among which 597 cases underwent Billroth Ⅰ anastomosis, 385 cases underwent Billroth Ⅱ anastomosis, 401 cases underwent Roux-en-Y anastomosis and 13 cases underwent residual stomach-esophagus anastomosis. The operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss and cases with intraoperative blood transfusion were (221±51)minutes, (201±81)mL, 24 of 415 cases undergoing Da Vinci robotic radical gastrectomy, and (196±42)minutes, (232±76)mL, 75 of 981 cases undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy, respectively. (2) Postoperative situations: the time to postoperative first flatus, time to postoperative initial liquid food intake and duration of postoperative hospital stay of the 1 396 patients were (3.0±1.0) days, (4.2±1.5) days and (9.0±3.8) days, respectively. Two hundred and ten of the 1 396 patients had postoperative complications including 170 cases with grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ complications and 40 cases with grade Ⅲ-Ⅴ complications. Eight of the 210 patients with postoperative complications died of serious complica-tions and the other 202 cases were cured after symptomatic treatment. Results of postoperative histopathological examination showed that there were 958 cases of adenocarcinoma, 220 cases of mucinous adenocarcinoma, and 218 cases of signet ring cell carcinoma. The number of lymph node harvested and the number of positive lymph node of the 1 396 patients were 26.0±8.3 and 3.6±0.9, respectively, and cases with the number of lymph node harvested ≥16 or <16 were 1 312 and 84. (3) Influencing factors for the number of lymph node harvested after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results of univariate analysis showed that the operating surgeon, operation method, range of gastric resection, nerve invasion, degree of tumor invasion and tumor pathological N stage were related factors influencing the number of lymph node harvested after Da Vinci robotic and laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer ( χ2=13.167, 6.029, 15.686, 5.573, 9.402, 17.139, P<0.05). Results of multivariate analysis showed that the operating surgeon, operation method, range of gastric resection and tumor pathological N stage were independent factors influencing the number of lymph node harvested after Da Vinci robotic and laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer ( odds ratio=1.589, 2.018, 1.787, 0.267, 95% confidence interval as 1.221?2.068, 1.140?3.570, 1.066?2.994, 0.103?0.689, P<0.05). (4) Follow-up and survival: of the 1 396 patients, 1 256 cases were followed up for 2 to 70 months, with a median follow-up time of 27 months. The 3-year cumulative survival rate of the 1 256 cases was 70.2%. Conclusion:The operating surgeon, operation method, range of gastric resection and tumor pathological N stage are independent factors influencing the number of lymph node harvested after Da Vinci robotic and laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) of gastrointestinal tract is a rare and low malignant mesenchymal tumor, which is composed of differentiated myofibroblastoid spindle cells and often accompanied by numerous inflammatory cells such as plasma cells, lymphocytes, and eosinophils. Surgical resection is the preferred treatment for IMT of gastrointestinal tract, and patients can achieve a good prognosis after surgery. In recent years, with the progress of imaging examination and pathological diagnosis technology, the detection rate of IMT of gastrointes-tinal tract has been greatly improved, but its pathogenesis and mechanism have not been completely investigated, requiring further research results to confirm. At the same time, due to the lack of standardized strategies for diagnosis and treatment of IMT of gastrointestinal tract, it was inevitable to miss diagnosis or treatment in clinical diagnosis and treatment. By reviewing relevant literatures and combined with the team's practical experience, the authors summarize the research progress of the diagnosis and treatment of IMT of gastrointestinal tract from the aspects of pathogenesis, clinical diagnosis and treatment strategies of IMT, aiming to provide references for the clinical treatment of surgeons.

Objective To explore the short?term clinical efficacy of robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction. Methods A cohort study was carried out. The clinical data of consecutive patients with high rectal cancer who underwent robotic radical resection at the Department of General Surgery of The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from June 2017 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria: (1) preoperative diagnosis of rectal cancer, and distance from tumor to anal margin≥10 cm undercolonoscopy; (2) T1?3 assessed by preoperative imaging examination, and no distant metastasis; (3) female, age≥50 years old, body mass index≤30 kg/m2;(4) without radiotherapy and chemotherapy before surgery; (5) implementation of robotic radical surgery for high rectal cancer. Fourteen female patients undergoing transvaginal removal of specimen without abdominal incision were included in the no incision group with age of (62.2±9.3) years old and distance from tumor to anal verge of (12.5±0.9) cm. As the match of 1:2, 28 simultaneous patients of high rectal cancer undergoing traditional robotic surgery (surgery interval <8 months) were enrolled to the control group, with age of (60.6±12.8) years old and distance from tumor to anal verge of (11.3±3.8) cm. Short?term efficacy and safty were compared between two groups. Follow?up ended in September 2018. Results There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (all P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the no incision group had longer operation time [(149.6±15.6) minutes vs. (130.9±12.9) minutes, t=–4.135, P<0.001], shorter time to postoperative flatus [(40.9 ±2.6) hours vs. (51.9±2.9) hours, t=12.049, P<0.001], lower pain score on the operation day and the first day after surgery (using Changhaipainstick) [(3.1±0.4) points vs. (4.6±0.7) points, t=7.458, P<0.001; (2.5±0.3) points vs. (3.3±0.5) points, t=6.142, P<0.001], shorter time to ground activity [(15.6±2.0) hours vs. (24.3±2.5) hours, t=11.102, P=0.030], and shorter postoperative hospital stay [(6.1 ± 0.8) days vs. (7.2 ± 1.3) days, t=2.806,P=0.008], whose differences were statistically significant. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, proportion of postoperative analgesia patients, and complication within 30 days after surgery (all P>0.05). In the no incision group and the control group,the tumor size was (3.1±0.4) cm and (3.6±0.9) cm, the proximal margin distance was (9.1±1.5) cm and (9.8±1.5) cm, the distal margin distance was (4.3± 0.4) cm and (4.5 ± 0.4) cm, the number of harvested lymph node was 15.8 ± 2.4 and 15.2 ± 2.5, and the number of positive lymph node was 0.6 ± 1.3 and 1.1 ± 2.4, respectively, whose differences were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). The mean followed?up period was 10 months (7?14 months) in the no incision group, and 14 months (10?18 months) in the control group. No local recurrence and distant metastasis were found in both groups. Conclusion Robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction is safe and feasible with advantages of rapid postoperative recovery, less postoperative pain and short hospital stay.

Objective To explore the short?term clinical efficacy of robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction. Methods A cohort study was carried out. The clinical data of consecutive patients with high rectal cancer who underwent robotic radical resection at the Department of General Surgery of The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from June 2017 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria: (1) preoperative diagnosis of rectal cancer, and distance from tumor to anal margin≥10 cm undercolonoscopy; (2) T1?3 assessed by preoperative imaging examination, and no distant metastasis; (3) female, age≥50 years old, body mass index≤30 kg/m2;(4) without radiotherapy and chemotherapy before surgery; (5) implementation of robotic radical surgery for high rectal cancer. Fourteen female patients undergoing transvaginal removal of specimen without abdominal incision were included in the no incision group with age of (62.2±9.3) years old and distance from tumor to anal verge of (12.5±0.9) cm. As the match of 1:2, 28 simultaneous patients of high rectal cancer undergoing traditional robotic surgery (surgery interval <8 months) were enrolled to the control group, with age of (60.6±12.8) years old and distance from tumor to anal verge of (11.3±3.8) cm. Short?term efficacy and safty were compared between two groups. Follow?up ended in September 2018. Results There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (all P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the no incision group had longer operation time [(149.6±15.6) minutes vs. (130.9±12.9) minutes, t=–4.135, P<0.001], shorter time to postoperative flatus [(40.9 ±2.6) hours vs. (51.9±2.9) hours, t=12.049, P<0.001], lower pain score on the operation day and the first day after surgery (using Changhaipainstick) [(3.1±0.4) points vs. (4.6±0.7) points, t=7.458, P<0.001; (2.5±0.3) points vs. (3.3±0.5) points, t=6.142, P<0.001], shorter time to ground activity [(15.6±2.0) hours vs. (24.3±2.5) hours, t=11.102, P=0.030], and shorter postoperative hospital stay [(6.1 ± 0.8) days vs. (7.2 ± 1.3) days, t=2.806,P=0.008], whose differences were statistically significant. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, proportion of postoperative analgesia patients, and complication within 30 days after surgery (all P>0.05). In the no incision group and the control group,the tumor size was (3.1±0.4) cm and (3.6±0.9) cm, the proximal margin distance was (9.1±1.5) cm and (9.8±1.5) cm, the distal margin distance was (4.3± 0.4) cm and (4.5 ± 0.4) cm, the number of harvested lymph node was 15.8 ± 2.4 and 15.2 ± 2.5, and the number of positive lymph node was 0.6 ± 1.3 and 1.1 ± 2.4, respectively, whose differences were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). The mean followed?up period was 10 months (7?14 months) in the no incision group, and 14 months (10?18 months) in the control group. No local recurrence and distant metastasis were found in both groups. Conclusion Robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction is safe and feasible with advantages of rapid postoperative recovery, less postoperative pain and short hospital stay.

Objective: To explore the short-term clinical efficacy of robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction. Methods: A cohort study was carried out. The clinical data of consecutive patients with high rectal cancer who underwent robotic radical resection at the Department of General Surgery of The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from June 2017 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria: (1) preoperative diagnosis of rectal cancer, and distance from tumor to anal margin≥10 cm undercolonoscopy; (2) T1-3 assessed by preoperative imaging examination, and no distant metastasis; (3) female, age≥50 years old, body mass index ≤ 30 kg/m²; (4) without radiotherapy and chemotherapy before surgery; (5) implementation of robotic radical surgery for high rectal cancer. Fourteen female patients undergoing transvaginal removal of specimen without abdominal incision were included in the no incision group with age of (62.2±9.3) years old and distance from tumor to anal verge of (12.5±0.9) cm. As the match of 1:2, 28 simultaneous patients of high rectal cancer undergoing traditional robotic surgery (surgery interval <8 months) were enrolled to the control group, with age of (60.6±12.8) years old and distance from tumor to anal verge of (11.3±3.8) cm. Short-term efficacy and safty were compared between two groups. Follow-up ended in September 2018. Results: There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (all P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the no incision group had longer operation time [(149.6±15.6) minutes vs. (130.9±12.9) minutes, t=-4.135, P<0.001], shorter time to postoperative flatus [(40.9 ±2.6) hours vs. (51.9±2.9) hours, t=12.049, P<0.001], lower pain score on the operation day and the first day after surgery (using Changhaipainstick) [(3.1±0.4) points vs. (4.6±0.7) points, t=7.458, P<0.001; (2.5±0.3) points vs. (3.3±0.5) points, t=6.142, P<0.001], shorter time to ground activity [(15.6±2.0) hours vs. (24.3±2.5) hours, t=11.102, P=0.030], and shorter postoperative hospital stay [(6.1±0.8) days vs. (7.2±1.3) days, t=2.806, P=0.008], whose differences were statistically significant. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, proportion of postoperative analgesia patients, and complication within 30 days after surgery (all P>0.05). In the no incision group and the control group,the tumor size was (3.1±0.4) cm and (3.6±0.9) cm, the proximal margin distance was (9.1±1.5) cm and (9.8±1.5) cm, the distal margin distance was (4.3±0.4) cm and (4.5±0.4) cm, the number of harvested lymph node was 15.8±2.4 and 15.2 ± 2.5, and the number of positive lymph node was 0.6±1.3 and 1.1±2.4, respectively, whose differences were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). The mean followed-up period was 10 months (7-14 months) in the no incision group, and 14 months (10-18 months) in the control group. No local recurrence and distant metastasis were found in both groups. Conclusion Robotic radical resection for high rectal cancer with transvaginal specimen extraction is safe and feasible with advantages of rapid postoperative recovery, less postoperative pain and short hospital stay.

Objective:To investigate the application value of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in totally Da Vinci robotic total gastrectomy.Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 97 patients with gastric cancer who underwent totally Da Vinci robotic total gastrectomy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between January 2016 and February 2019 were collected.There were 57 males and 40 females, aged (59±10)years, with a range from 35 to 60 years. Of the 97 patients, 52 receiving perioperative management using ERAS were allocated into ERAS group, and 45 receiving traditional perioperative management were allocated into traditional group. Observation indicators: (1) intraoperative situations; (2) postoperative situations. Measurement data with normal distribution were expressed as Mean± SD, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the t test. Count data were described as absolute numbers, and the chi-square test was used for comparison between groups. Repeated measurement data were analyzed by ANOVA. Comparison of ordinal datas was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results:(1) Intraoperative situations: patients in the ERAS group and traditional group underwent totally Da Vinci robotic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer successfully. Cases with Roux-en-Y anastomosis or uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis (methods of digestive reconstruction), operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss for the ERAS group were 25, 27, (205±28)minutes, (176±80)mL, respectively, versus 21, 24, (199±31)minutes, (182±81)mL for the traditional group, showing no significant difference in the above indicators between the two groups ( χ2=0.02, t=1.00, 0.37, P>0.05). (2) Postoperative situations: time to first out-of-bed activities, time to first anal flatus, time to initial liquid food intake, time to abdominal drainage tube removal, cases with postoperative complications, the number of lymph node dissected, cases in stage Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ of postoperative tumor staging, duration of postoperative hospital stay, hospitalization expenses were (1.85±0.29)days, (2.90±0.47)days, (2.53±0.28)days, (5.72±0.95)days, 6, 28±8, 4, 25, 23, (6.43±0.52)days, (60 222±3 888)yuan in the ERAS group and (3.04±0.39)days, (3.82±0.36)days, (4.24±0.30)days, (6.75±0.48)days, 5, (27±6)days, 3, 20, 22, (8.47±0.69)days, (64 197±3 369)yuan in the traditional group, respectively. There were significant differences in the time to first out-of-bed activities, time to first anal flatus, time to initial liquid food intake, time to abdominal drainage tube removal, duration of postoperative hospital stay and hospitalization expenses between the two groups ( t=17.19, 10.69, 29.02, 6.58, 16.57, 5.34, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the postoperative complications, the number of lymph node dissected, or postoperative tumor staging between the two groups ( χ2=0.01, t=0.68, Z=-0.46, P>0.05). From 2 hours after anesthesia awakening to 48 hours after surgery, the visual analog pain scores were changed from 3.06±0.29 to 2.13±0.32 in the ERAS group, and from 4.11±0.74 to 3.26±0.42 in the traditional group, respectively, showing a significant difference in the changing trend between the two groups ( F=264.45, P<0.05). There was no death or readmission in the postoperative 30 days. Conclusions:ERAS applied in the totally Da Vinci robotic total gastrectomy is safe and effective, which is associated with faster gastrointestinal function recovery, shorter hospital stay, better pain control, and quicker recovery afer surgery.

Objective:To compare the short- and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical resection for mid-low rectal cancer.Methods:A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. A total of 130 patients with mid-low rectal cancer (inclusion criteria: age > 18 or ≤80 years old; pathological diagnosis of rectal adenocarcinoma by colonoscopy; distance from tumor to the anal verge ≤12 cm; no distant metastasis; cT1-3N0-1 or ycT1-3 after neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy; suitable for laparoscopic and robotic surgery) at the Department of Colorectal Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from October 2016 to September 2018 were prospectively enrolled. According to computer-generated random number method, patients were randomly divided into the robot group ( n=66) and laparoscopy group ( n=64), and underwent robot-assisted surgery or laparoscopic surgery respectively. Clinicopathological data of all the patients were collected and analyzed. The demographic parameters, short- and long-term outcomes were compared between two groups. Results:One patient in robot group whose postoperative sample was diagnosed as rectal adenoma by pathology was excluded. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, BMI, ASA classification, distance from tumor to the anal verge, serum CEA level, CA199 level between two groups (all P>0.05). Operations were successfully performed in all the patients without conversion to open operation. Robotic surgery was found to be associated with less intraoperative blood loss than laparoscopic surgery [(73.4±49.7) ml vs. (119.1±65.7) ml, t=-4.461, P<0.001], while there were no statistically significant differences in surgical procedures, operation time, time to first flatus, time to first liquid intake, time to removal of catheter or postoperative hospital stay between two groups (all P>0.05). Besides, there was no significant difference in the morbidity of postoperative complication between two groups [10.8% (7/65) vs. 12.5 (8/64), χ 2=4.342, P=0.720]. The median number of harvested lymph node in the robot group and the laparoscopy group was 15.7±6.2 and 13.8±6.1 ( t=1.724, P=0.087). There were no significant differences between two groups in tumor sample length, distance between proximal and distal resection margin, integrity grade of TME specimen, number of positive lymph nodes, postoperative pathological stage and tumor differentiation (all P>0.05). The distal resection margin of samples in two groups was all negative. One case in the robot group was found to have positive circumferential resection margin. The median follow up was 24 (9 to 31) months. In the robot group and the laparoscopy group, the 2-year overall survival rate was 95.4% and 90.6% respectively; the 2-year disease-free survival rate was 90.8% and 85.9% respectively, whose differences were not significant (both P>0.05). Conclusion:Robot-assisted radical resection for mid-low rectal cancer can achieve similar short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection, while robot-assisted surgery can decrease blood loss during operation, leading to more precise practice in minimally invasive surgery.

Objective:To compare the short- and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical resection for mid-low rectal cancer.Methods:A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. A total of 130 patients with mid-low rectal cancer (inclusion criteria: age > 18 or ≤80 years old; pathological diagnosis of rectal adenocarcinoma by colonoscopy; distance from tumor to the anal verge ≤12 cm; no distant metastasis; cT1-3N0-1 or ycT1-3 after neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy; suitable for laparoscopic and robotic surgery) at the Department of Colorectal Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from October 2016 to September 2018 were prospectively enrolled. According to computer-generated random number method, patients were randomly divided into the robot group ( n=66) and laparoscopy group ( n=64), and underwent robot-assisted surgery or laparoscopic surgery respectively. Clinicopathological data of all the patients were collected and analyzed. The demographic parameters, short- and long-term outcomes were compared between two groups. Results:One patient in robot group whose postoperative sample was diagnosed as rectal adenoma by pathology was excluded. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, BMI, ASA classification, distance from tumor to the anal verge, serum CEA level, CA199 level between two groups (all P>0.05). Operations were successfully performed in all the patients without conversion to open operation. Robotic surgery was found to be associated with less intraoperative blood loss than laparoscopic surgery [(73.4±49.7) ml vs. (119.1±65.7) ml, t=-4.461, P<0.001], while there were no statistically significant differences in surgical procedures, operation time, time to first flatus, time to first liquid intake, time to removal of catheter or postoperative hospital stay between two groups (all P>0.05). Besides, there was no significant difference in the morbidity of postoperative complication between two groups [10.8% (7/65) vs. 12.5 (8/64), χ 2=4.342, P=0.720]. The median number of harvested lymph node in the robot group and the laparoscopy group was 15.7±6.2 and 13.8±6.1 ( t=1.724, P=0.087). There were no significant differences between two groups in tumor sample length, distance between proximal and distal resection margin, integrity grade of TME specimen, number of positive lymph nodes, postoperative pathological stage and tumor differentiation (all P>0.05). The distal resection margin of samples in two groups was all negative. One case in the robot group was found to have positive circumferential resection margin. The median follow up was 24 (9 to 31) months. In the robot group and the laparoscopy group, the 2-year overall survival rate was 95.4% and 90.6% respectively; the 2-year disease-free survival rate was 90.8% and 85.9% respectively, whose differences were not significant (both P>0.05). Conclusion:Robot-assisted radical resection for mid-low rectal cancer can achieve similar short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection, while robot-assisted surgery can decrease blood loss during operation, leading to more precise practice in minimally invasive surgery.