Human ; Communication ; Counseling ; Family ; Genetic Counseling ; Risk

Humans ; Nephrotic Syndrome/drug therapy* ; Genetic Testing ; Child ; Prognosis ; Genetic Counseling ; Steroids/therapeutic use*

Humans ; Genetic Counseling ; Genetic Testing ; Disorders of Sex Development/therapy* ; Consensus ; Child ; Male ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Female ; Quality of Life

Genetic counseling for hearing loss today originated from decoding the genetic code of hereditary hearing loss, which serves as an effective strategy for preventing hearing loss and constitutes a crucial component of the diagnostic and therapeutic framework. This paper described the main principles and contents of genetic counseling for hearing loss, the key points of counseling across various genetic models and its application in tertiary prevention strategies targeting hearing impairment. The prospects of an AI-assisted genetic counseling decision system and the envisions of genetic counseling in preventing hereditary hearing loss were introduced. Genetic counseling for hearing loss today embodies the hallmark of a new era, which is inseparable from the advancements in science and technology, and will undoubtedly contribute to precise gene intervention!
Humans ; Genetic Counseling ; Deafness/genetics* ; Hearing Loss/diagnosis* ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/genetics*

Hereditary endocrine and metabolic diseases , caused by genetic factors, exhibit complex and diverse symptoms, including the possibility of concurrent sensorineural deafness. Currently, there is a limited clinical understanding of hereditary endocrine and metabolic diseases that manifest with deafness, the pathogenesis remains unclear,and there is a lack of effective diagnostic and treatment methods. This article summarizes the research progress of hereditary endocrine and metabolic diseases complicated with deafness from the pathogenesis, clinical phenotype, diagnosis and treatment. Understanding the current research progress and integrating genetic analysis into clinical practice are crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment, evaluating clinical efficacy, and providing effective genetic counseling for these diseases.
Humans ; Deafness/genetics* ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/diagnosis* ; Phenotype ; Metabolic Diseases/genetics* ; Genetic Counseling

Objective:By conducting genetic testing of hereditary hearing loss in pregnant women within 17 weeks of gestation in Dali areas, the importance of genetic testing and genetic counseling during pregnancy was emphasized. Methods:Twenty-one mutation sites of 4 hearing loss genes, including GJB2, GJB3, SLC26A4 and mtDNA, were detected by PCR amplification technology. The positive ratio, mutation ratio and ethnic distribution of positive samples were statistically described. Results:The positive ratios of GJB2 and SLC26A4 genes were 1.24% and 1.43%, respectively, with mutation rates of 40.62% and 46.88% in the positive samples, respectively. The positive ratio of GJB3gene was 0.19%, and mtDNA mutation genes accounted for 0.14%, and all of them were mtDNA（Heterozygous）. There was only one case of GJB2/SLC26A4 double positive multi-gene mutation, with a positive ratio of 0.05%. The frequency of GJB2 c. 235delC site was the highest, accounting for 65.38% of GJB2 mutation genes and 26.56% of mutation gene samples. Conclusion:GJB2 and SLC26A4 are the most common genes of hearing loss, and GJB2 c. 235delC site is the most common mutation site. Identifying the hearing loss mutation site is of great importance to prevent the birth of hereditary hearing loss children, and genetic diagnosis, genetic counseling, and appropriate intervention are crucial to alleviate congenital problems.
Humans ; Female ; Pregnancy ; Sulfate Transporters/genetics* ; Connexin 26 ; Genetic Testing/methods* ; Connexins/genetics* ; Mutation ; Hearing Loss/diagnosis* ; DNA, Mitochondrial/genetics* ; Adult ; Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics* ; Genetic Counseling

Objective: To investigate the genetic, clinical and pathological characteristics of families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOCS) and to explore the implementation of genetic counseling and preventive surgery. Methods: Four siblings with HBOCS in Cancer Hospital/Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences were selected as the study subjects. BRCA gene testing and genetic counseling were performed, family history was traced and family map was drawn. Results: There were 7 cancer patients (Ⅰ 2, Ⅱ 4, Ⅱ 8, Ⅲ 7, Ⅲ 10, Ⅲ 11, Ⅲ 12) in three generations in the family. One patient (Ⅲ 7) had breast cancer and ovarian cancer successively. The first generation (Ⅰ 2) developed cancer at age 60, the second generation (Ⅱ4 and Ⅱ8) developed cancer at 55. The third generation (Ⅲ 7, Ⅲ 10, Ⅲ 11, Ⅲ 12) developed cancer at the age of 42-50 years. Four HBOCS patients were treated in our hospital, and all of them were found to have deleterious BRCA1 mutation. Two had already developed ovarian cancer (Ⅲ 10, Ⅲ 12), while in one case (Ⅲ 11), tubal carcinoma was found during preventive total hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node metastasis was found after the supplementary staging surgery. The other patient without cancer underwent preventive bilateral salpingectomy(Ⅲ 15). Conclusion: The HBOCS family reported in this study is relatively rare, the onset time of tumor was younger generation by generation. It is very important to pay attention to the genetic counseling of ovarian cancer patients and to timely detect the HBOCS families for genetic testing and prophylactic surgery.
Humans ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Genetic Counseling ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease ; Breast Neoplasms/surgery* ; Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery* ; Mutation

Humans ; Genetic Counseling ; Consensus ; Hypogonadism/genetics*

Child ; Humans ; Genetic Counseling ; Consensus ; Genetic Testing

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical phenotype and genetic basis of a child with early onset neurodevelopmental disorder with involuntary movement (NEDIM). METHODS: A child who presented at Department of Neurology of Hunan Children's Hospital on October 8, 2020 was selected as the study subject. Clinical data of the child were collected. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples of the child and his parents. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was carried out for the child. Candidate variant was verified by Sanger sequencing and bioinformatic analysis. Relevant literature was searched from the CNKI, PubMed and Google Scholar databases to summarize the clinical phenotypes and genetic variants of the patients. RESULTS: This child was a 3-year-and-3-month boy with involuntary trembling of limbs and motor and language delay. WES revealed that the child has harbored a c.626G>A (p.Arg209His) variant of the GNAO1 gene. Sanger sequencing confirmed that neither of his parents has carried the same variant. The variant had been reported in HGMD and ClinVar databases, but not in the dbSNP, ExAC and 1000 Genomes databases. Prediction with SIFT, PolyPhen-2, and Mutation Taster online software suggested that the variant may be deleterious to the protein function. By UniProt database analysis, the encode amino acid is highly conserved among various species. Prediction with Modeller and PyMOL software indicated that the variant may affect the function of GαO protein. Based on the guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), the variant was rated as pathogenic. CONCLUSION The GNAO1 gene c.626G>A (p.Arg209His) variant probably underlay the NEDIM in this child. Above finding has expanded the phenotypic spectrum of GNAO1 gene c.626G>A (p.Arg209His) variant and provided a reference for clinical diagnosis and genetic counseling.
Humans ; Computational Biology ; Genetic Counseling ; Genomics ; Mutation ; Neurodevelopmental Disorders/genetics* ; Dyskinesias ; GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gi-Go