1.The Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Microcoil Embolization in Patients with Active Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the Small Bowel.
Hyo Sung KWAK ; Young Min HAN ; Soo Teik LEE
Korean Journal of Radiology 2009;10(4):391-397
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical outcomes of the transcatheter microcoil embolization in patients with active lower gastrointestinal (LGI) bleeding in the small bowel, as well as to compare the mortality rates between the two groups based on the visualization or non-visualization of the bleeding focus determined by an angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS:We retrospectively evaluated all of the consecutive patients who underwent an angiography for treatment of acute LGI bleeding between January 2003 and October 2007. In total, the study included 36 patients who underwent a colonoscopy and were diagnosed to have an active bleeding in the LGI tracts. Based on the visualization or non-visualization of the bleeding focus, determined by an angiography, the patients were classified into two groups. The clinical outcomes included technical success, clinical success (no rebleeding within 30 days), delayed rebleeding (> 30 days), as well as the major and minor complication rates. RESULTS: Of the 36 patients, 17 had angiography-proven bleeding that was distal to the marginal artery. The remaining 19 patients did not have a bleeding focus based on the angiography results. The technical and clinical success rates of performing transcatheter microcoil embolizations in patients with active bleeding were 100% and 88%, respectively (15 of 17). One patient died from continued LGI bleeding and one patient received surgery to treat the continued bleeding. There was no note made on the delayed bleeding or on the major or minor complications. Of the 19 patients without active bleeding, 16 (84%) did not have recurrent bleeding. One patient died due to continuous bleeding and multi-organ failure. CONCLUSION: The superselective microcoil embolization can help successfully treat patients with active LGI bleeding in the small bowel, identified by the results of an angiography. The mortality rate is not significantly different between the patients of the visualization and non-visualization groups on angiography.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Angiography
;
Embolization, Therapeutic/*methods
;
Female
;
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/mortality/radiography/*therapy
;
Humans
;
Intestine, Small/*blood supply
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Treatment Outcome
2.Intra-Arterial Treatment in Patients with Acute Massive Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Endoscopic Failure: Comparisons between Positive versus Negative Contrast Extravasation Groups.
Wei Chou CHANG ; Chang Hsien LIU ; Hsian He HSU ; Guo Shu HUANG ; Ho Jui TUNG ; Tsai Yuan HSIEH ; Shih Hung TSAI ; Chung Bao HSIEH ; Chih Yung YU
Korean Journal of Radiology 2011;12(5):568-578
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatment outcome is associated with visualization of contrast extravasation in patients with acute massive gastrointestinal bleeding after endoscopic failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2007 to December 2009, patients that experienced a first attack of acute gastrointestinal bleeding after failure of initial endoscopy were referred to our interventional department for intra-arterial treatment. We enrolled 79 patients and divided them into two groups: positive and negative extravasation. For positive extravasation, patients were treated by coil embolization; and in negative extravasation, patients were treated with intra-arterial vasopressin infusion. The two groups were compared for clinical parameters, hemodynamics, laboratory findings, endoscopic characteristics, and mortality rates. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients had detectable contrast extravasation (positive extravasation), while 31 patients did not (negative extravasation). Fifty-six patients survived from this bleeding episode (overall clinical success rate, 71%). An elevation of hemoglobin level was observed in the both two groups; significantly greater in the positive extravasation group compared to the negative extravasation group. Although these patients were all at high risk of dying, the 90-day mortality rate was significantly lower in the positive extravasation than in the negative extravasation (20% versus 42%, p < 0.05). A multivariate analysis suggested that successful hemostasis (odds ratio [OR] = 28.66) is the most important predictor affecting the mortality in the two groups of patients. CONCLUSION: Visualization of contrast extravasation on angiography usually can target the bleeding artery directly, resulting in a higher success rate to control of hemorrhage.
Acute Disease
;
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
*Angiography
;
*Embolization, Therapeutic
;
Extravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials/*radiography
;
Female
;
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/mortality/radiography/*therapy
;
Hemostasis, Endoscopic
;
Hemostatics/*administration & dosage
;
Humans
;
Infusions, Intra-Arterial
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
*Radiography, Interventional
;
Treatment Failure
;
Vasopressins/*administration & dosage
;
Young Adult