Endoscopy, Digestive System ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices ; complications ; drug therapy ; surgery ; therapy ; Fibrosis ; complications ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ; drug therapy ; etiology ; surgery ; therapy ; Humans ; Hypertension, Portal ; drug therapy ; etiology ; surgery ; therapy

Catheterization ; Endoscopy ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices ; complications ; drug therapy ; surgery ; therapy ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ; drug therapy ; etiology ; surgery ; therapy ; Humans ; Octreotide ; therapeutic use ; Somatostatin ; therapeutic use ; Vasopressins ; therapeutic use

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Terlipressin and octreotide had been used to control acute variceal bleeding and to prevent early rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis. We compared the efficacy and safety of terlipressin and octreotide combined with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) for the treatment of acute esophageal variceal bleeding and we evaluated their clinical significance as related to rebleeding. METHODS: The eighty eight cirrhotic patients were randomized to the terlipressin group (n=43; 2 mg i.v. initially and 1 mg i.v. at every 4 hours for 3 days) or the octreotide group (n=45; continuous infusion of 25 microgram/h for 5 days) combined with EVL for the treatment of acute esophageal variceal bleeding. RESULTS: The initial hemostasis rates were 98% (42/43 cases) in the terlipressin group and 96% (43/45 cases) in the octreotide group. The 5-day and 42-day rebleeding rates were 12% (5/43 cases) and 28% (12/43 cases), respectively, in the terlipressin group and 9% (4/45 cases) and 24% (11/45 cases), respectively, in the octreotide group. No significant difference was demonstrated between the terlipressin and octreotide groups. The mortality at 42 days was similar in both group, but a high mortality rate (48%) was shown to be related to 42-day rebleeding. The risk factors related to 42-day rebleeding were Child-Pugh class C (aOR=30.2, 95% CI=7.7-117.9), ascites above grade II (aOR=6.6, 95% CI=2.2-19.2) and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aOR=4.6, 95% CI=1.1-18.9). CONCLUSIONS: Comparing terlipressin and octreotide combined with EVL showed them to be equally safe and effective therapeutic agents in patients with acute esophageal variceal bleeding. The high risk factors related to early rebleeding were poor liver function and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Acute Disease ; Aged ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices/drug therapy/surgery/*therapy ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/drug therapy/surgery/*therapy ; Humans ; Liver Cirrhosis/drug therapy/surgery/*therapy ; Lysine Vasopressin/*analogs & derivatives/therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Octreotide/*therapeutic use ; Vasoconstrictor Agents/*therapeutic use

Endoscopic hemostasis is the first-line treatment for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Although several factors are known to be risk factors for rebleeding, little is known about the use of antithrombotics. We tried to verify whether the use of antithrombotics affects rebleeding rate after a successful endoscopic hemostasis for peptic ulcer disease (PUD). UGIB patients who underwent successful endoscopic hemostasis were included. Rebleeding was diagnosed when the previously treated lesion bled again within 30 days of the initial episode. Of 522 UGIB patients with PUD, rebleeding occurred in 93 patients (17.8%). The rate of rebleeding was higher with aspirin medication (P=0.006) and after a long endoscopic hemostasis (P<0.001). Of all significant variables, procedure time longer than 13.5 min was related to the rate of rebleeding (OR, 2.899; 95% CI, 1.768-4.754; P<0.001) on the logistic regression analysis. The rate of rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis for PUD is higher in the patients after a long endoscopic hemostasis. Endoscopic hemostasis longer than 13.5 min is related to rebleeding after a successful endoscopic hemostasis for PUD.
Antithrombins/*therapeutic use ; Aspirin/adverse effects ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/drug therapy/*surgery ; Hemorrhage/*drug therapy ; Hemostasis, Endoscopic/methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Peptic Ulcer/*surgery ; Recurrence ; Upper Gastrointestinal Tract/pathology

Peptic ulcer (PU) bleeding is the main cause of non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding. Negative outcomes include re-bleeding and death, and many of the deaths are associated with decompensation of coexisting medical conditions precipitated by acute bleeding event. Accurate analysis of risk for clinical features can help physician to decide treatment modality. Endoscopy can detect bleeding stigmata and perform therapeutic hemostasis. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) compared with placebo or H2RA reduces mortality following PU bleeding among patients with high-risk endoscopic findings, and reduces re-bleeding rates and surgical intervention. PPI treatment initiated prior to endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding significantly reduces the proportion of patients with stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) at index endoscopy but does not reduce mortality, re-bleeding or the need for surgery. The strategy of giving oral PPI before and after endoscopy, with endoscopic hemostasis for those with major SRH, is likely to be the most cost-effective. The treatment of H. pyori infection was found to be more effective than anti-secretory therapy in preventing recurrent bleeding from PU. H. pyori eradication alone and eradication followed by misoprostol (with switch to PPI, if misoprostol is not tolerated) are the two most cost-effective strategies to prevent ulcer bleeding among H. pyori-infected NSAID users, although the data cannot exclude PPIs also being cost-effective treatment. This review focuses specifically on the current treatment of patients with acute bleeding from a peptic ulcer.
Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis ; Helicobacter Infections/diagnosis/drug therapy ; Helicobacter pylori ; Hemostasis, Endoscopic ; Humans ; Misoprostol/therapeutic use ; Peptic Ulcer/surgery/*therapy ; Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage/surgery/*therapy ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use

CMV infection may occur anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract. Among the small intestine, ileum is the most common site of CMV disease and infection of jejunum is a rare one in patients with CMV gastroenteritis. Although rare, the reason why the recognition of this diagnosis is important is that it cause the lethal hemorrhage and perforation of gastrointestinal tract when its diagnosis and treatment was delayed. Rapid diagnosis are able to using the immunohistochemical stain in shell vial culture of infected specimen or peripheral neutrophils preparation in viremic patients within 8 to 36 hours. The treatment of choice is antiviral agent or surgical resection. We experienced a case of CMV disease of jejunum in patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who showed severe ulceration in jejunum and massive intestinal hemorrhage, and he survived after successful treatment with segmental resection of jejunum and intravenous ganciclovir.
Adult ; Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use ; Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy ; Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis ; Cytomegalovirus Infections/complications* ; Disease-Free Survival ; Enteritis/virology ; Enteritis/surgery ; Enteritis/complications ; Ganciclovir/therapeutic use ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/therapy ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology* ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis ; Human ; Jejunal Diseases/virology ; Jejunal Diseases/surgery ; Jejunal Diseases/complications* ; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/drug therapy ; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/diagnosis ; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/complications* ; Male ; Opportunistic Infections/drug therapy ; Opportunistic Infections/diagnosis ; Opportunistic Infections/complications* ; Substances: Ganciclovir ; Substances: Antiviral Agents

OBJECTIVE: To compare endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) with propranolol for prophylaxis of first variceal bleeding. METHODS: We chose 168 patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices in our hospital and allocated them to EVL and propranolol groups. Treatment effectiveness and safety in the 2 groups were observed. RESULTS: he parameters of two groups were similar before therapy. Follow-up period was 8-36 months. Variceal bleeding occurred in 24 (28.6%) of the EVL group and in 20 (23.9%) of the propranolol group (P>0.05). Overall mortality and death related to bleeding were similar (21.4% vs 17.9%; 7.1% vs 6.0%, P>0.05). Adverse events related to EVL were 43 (3 of them life-threatening) compared to 16 in the propranolol group (51.19% vs 19.05%, P<0.05). CONCLUSION Propranolol may be the better choice in prophylaxis of variceal bleeding with similar effects and lower adverse events than with EVL.
Aged ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; methods ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices ; complications ; drug therapy ; surgery ; therapy ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage ; etiology ; prevention & control ; Humans ; Ligation ; methods ; Liver Cirrhosis ; complications ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Propranolol ; therapeutic use

There are indirect evidences to suggest that 80% of colorectal cancers (CRC) develop from adenomatous polyps and that, on average, it takes 10 years for a small polyp to transform into invasive CRC. In multiple cohort studies, colonoscopic polypectomy has been shown to significantly reduce the expected incidence of CRC by 76% to 90%. Colonoscopic polypectomy is performed frequently in primary, secondary and tertiary and medical centers in Korea. However, there are no evidence-based, procedural guidelines for the appropriate performance of this procedure, including the technical aspects. For the guideline presented here, Pubmed, Medline, and Cochrane Library literature searches were performed. When little or no data from well-designed prospective trials were available, an emphasis was placed on the results from large series and reports from recognized experts. Thus, these guidelines for colonoscopic polypectomy are based on a critical review of the available data as well as expert consensus. Further controlled clinical studies are needed to clarify aspects of this statement, and revision may be necessary as new data become available. This guideline is intended to be an educational device to provide information that may assist endoscopists in providing care to patients. This guideline is not a rule and should not be construed as a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment. Clinical decisions for any particular case involve a complex analysis of the patient's condition and the available courses of action.
Adenoma/diagnosis/*surgery ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use ; Aspirin/therapeutic use ; Colonic Polyps/pathology/*surgery ; Colonoscopy ; Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis/*surgery ; Databases, Factual ; Epinephrine/therapeutic use ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/prevention & control ; Humans ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Republic of Korea ; Surgical Instruments ; Thrombosis/drug therapy ; Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use

BACKGROUNE/AIMS: Esophageal variceal ligation (EVL) is the most preferable method for controling variceal bleeding. However, EVL is associated with complications such as hemorrhage, chest pain, dysphagia, and odynophagia due to post-EVL ulcers in the esophageal mucosa. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of proton pump inhibitor (PPI), pantoprazole on the healing of post-EVL ulcers. METHODS: Forty seven patients were randomly allocated into PPI group and control group. Patients in PPI group received 40 mg of pantoprazole intravenously for 3 days after EVL, then 40 mg of oral pantoprazole for 11 days consecutively. Control patients received intravenous and oral placebo. Endoscopic examinations were performed twice at 7+/-2 days and 14+/-2 days after EVL respectively. Clinical outcomes include the size of ulcers, symptoms reported by patients; chest pain, dysphagia, and odynophagia. RESULTS: Forty seven patients completed the 7 days protocol (PPI/control; 25/22), and twenty six patients completed the 14 days protocol (PPI/control; 16/10). Post-EVL ulcers in PPI group were significantly smaller than those in control group (7 days; 98.7 mm2/119.4 mm2, 14 days; 32.3 mm2/43.8 mm2, p<0.01). No difference was observed between two the groups with respect to summations of symptom scores (p>0.05). Nineteen patients (PPI/control; 9/10) did not complete the 14 days protocol due to patients' refusal and adverse outcomes, such as hepatic failure and sepsis with bleeding from post-EVL ulcer occurred in two patients of control group. CONCLUSIONS: PPI treatment following EVL may be effective in healing post-EVL ulcer.
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use ; Anti-Ulcer Agents/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices/complications/*surgery ; Esophagoscopy ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/prevention & control ; Humans ; Ligation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use ; Regression Analysis ; Sickness Impact Profile ; Ulcer/*drug therapy/etiology

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate the efficacy and longterm outcome of esophageal variceal ligation (EVL) plus propranolol in comparison with propranolol alone for the primary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding. METHODS: A total of 504 patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study. 330 patients were in propranolol group (Gr1) and 174 patients were in EVL plus propranolol group (Gr2). The endpoints of this study were esophageal variceal bleeding and mortality. Association analyses were performed to evaluate bleeding and mortality between Gr1 and Gr2. RESULTS: EVL was more applied in patients with high risk, such as large-sized varices (F2 or F3) or positive red color signs. Total 38 patients had bleeds, 32 in Gr1 and 6 in Gr2. The cumulative probability of bleeding at 120 months was 13% in Gr1 versus 4% in Gr2 (P=0.04). The predictive factors of variceal bleeding were red color signs (OR 2.962, P=0.007) and the method of propranolol plus EVL (OR 0.160, P=0.000). 20 patients died in Gr1 and 12 in Gr2. Mortality rates are similar in the two groups compared, 6.7% in Gr1 and 6.9% in Gr2. The cumulative probability of mortality at 120 months was not significantly different in the two groups (7% in Gr1, 12% in Gr2, P=0.798). The prognostic factors for mortality were age over 50 (OR 5.496, P=0.002), Child-Pugh class B (OR 3.979, P=0.001), and Child-Pugh class C (OR 10.861, P=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: EVL plus propranolol is more effective than propranolol alone in the prevention of the first variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/*therapeutic use ; Adult ; Aged ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices/*pathology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/*drug therapy/mortality/surgery ; Humans ; Ligation ; Liver Cirrhosis/etiology ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Odds Ratio ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Propranolol/*therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Severity of Illness Index ; Survival Rate