2.Statistical analysis of articles, citations and authors in Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery from 2002 to 2004.
Xiao-bin ZHOU ; Hong-song TENG
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2005;8(6):531-534
OBJECTIVETo study the characteristics of of articles, citations and authors in Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery(CJGS).
METHODSThe data of articles,citations and authors of CJCS from 2002 to 2004 were collected and analyzed in terms of bibliometric parameters.
RESULTSThere were 546 papers in CJCS during the past 3 years and project-funded papers accounted for 14.3%. The average number of articles per issue was 34; the average number of article per page was 0.44; the average publishing cycle of the articles was 7.52 months. The authors came from 28 provinces and Hong Kong SAR; the coauthor rate was 88.88%; the cooperation rate was 4.18. The papers with citation accounted for 92% and 93.78% of the citations were from journals. The Prices indicator was 60.1%.
CONCLUSIONChinese Journal Gastrointestinal Surgery is a high quality academic journal with strong influence, and promotes the development and construction of gastrointestinal surgery in China.
Bibliometrics ; China ; Gastroenterology ; Periodicals as Topic ; statistics & numerical data ; Publishing ; statistics & numerical data
3.The Assessment of Korean Gastroenterology Research Achievements.
You Sun KIM ; Hee Kyung CHUNG ; Joo Sung KIM ; Seungmin BANG ; Moon Seok CHOI ; Jung Mogg KIM ; Choon Shil LEE ; Jae Bock CHUNG
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2009;53(2):131-140
The subcommittee on the Assessment of Korean Gastroenterology Research Achievements of the Korean Society of Gastroenterology (KSG) conducted a survey of SCI papers in the fields of gastroenterology to evaluate the current status of Korean gastroenterology research. A total of 4,260 papers were confirmed as gastroenterology papers published by researchers affiliated with Korean medical institutions during the 1974-2006 periods. Among those 4,260 papers, 2,373 papers were authored by the members of the KSG. The first Korean gastroenterology SCI paper was published in 1981 and the Korean SCI gastroenterology publication output dramatically increased since 1995. Sixty three institutions published SCI papers and 14 institutions published more than 100 SCI papers. Sixteen members of KSG published more than 20 SCI papers as reprint authors. Ninety percent of Korean gastroenterology papers was cited at least once. KSG member reprint author papers were cited an average of 4.1 times within 3 years after publication. Korean gastroenterology research achievements over the last 30 years show a remarkable growth in terms of quantity and quality. The KSG members have played central roles in these progresses, and it is anticipated that they will continue to do so in the future.
Academies and Institutes
;
Achievement
;
Authorship
;
*Bibliometrics
;
Biomedical Research/*statistics & numerical data
;
Gastroenterology/*statistics & numerical data
;
Korea
;
Periodicals as Topic/*statistics & numerical data
4.Research Using Big Data in Gastroenterology: Based on the Outcomes from Big Data Research Group of the Korean Society of Gastroenterology
Jie Hyun KIM ; Hyunsoo CHUNG ; Hyun Soo KIM ; Su Young KIM ; Jae Myung CHA ; Chang Kyun LEE ; Byung Kyu PARK ; Sohee PARK ;
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2020;75(1):4-10
The Big Data Research Committee of the Korean Society of Gastroenterology conducted activities and researches with three goals. First, it provides the basis for proper and cost-effective treatment of digestive diseases in Korea. Second, it carries out population-level global research by establishing a system of big data analysis related to gastroenterology. Third, it provides the members of the Korean Society of Gastroenterology with the opportunity to plan and assess the public interest related to big data. The studies published by the committee members in this paper were carried out under these objectives, and the findings are believed to have achieved the public interest goals that may be helpful in the current medical and health policy. The construction of the big data infrastructure for digestive drugs is also underway, and we expect to see meaningful results pertaining to important digestive drugs. Research using public health medical big data, such as the National Health Insurance Corporation data base, should ultimately provide a basis for reflecting public messages and policies for the public. To this end, it is necessary for Korean researchers to lead efforts to lower the barriers and to approach relevant information and opportunities using big data research.
Committee Membership
;
Gastroenterology
;
Health Policy
;
Korea
;
National Health Programs
;
Public Health
;
Statistics as Topic
5.Room for Quality Improvement in Endoscopist-Directed Sedation: Results from the First Nationwide Survey in Korea.
Chang Kyun LEE ; Seok Ho DONG ; Eun Sun KIM ; Sung Hoon MOON ; Hong Jun PARK ; Dong Hoon YANG ; Young Chul YOO ; Tae Hoon LEE ; Sang Kil LEE ; Jong Jin HYUN
Gut and Liver 2016;10(1):83-94
BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study sought to characterize the current sedation practices of Korean endoscopists in real-world settings. METHODS: All active members of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy were invited to complete an anonymous 35-item questionnaire. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 22.7% (1,332/5,860). Propofol-based sedation was the dominant method used in both elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy (55.6%) and colonoscopy (52.6%). The mean satisfaction score for propofol-based sedation was significantly higher than that for standard sedation in both examinations (all p<0.001). The use of propofol was supervised exclusively by endoscopists (98.6%). Endoscopists practicing in nonacademic settings, gastroenterologists, or endoscopists with <10 years of endoscopic practice were more likely to use propofol than were their counterparts (all p<0.001). In total, 27.3% of all respondents performed sedation practices without having undergone sedation training, and 27.4% did so without any formal sedation protocols. The choice of propofol as the dominant sedation method was the only significant predictor of endoscopist experience with serious sedation-related adverse events (odds ratio, 1.854; 95% confidence interval, 1.414 to 2.432). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopist-directed propofol administration is the predominant sedation method used in Korea. This survey strongly suggests that there is much room for quality improvement regarding sedation training and patient vigilance in endoscopist-directed sedation.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Colonoscopy/methods/psychology
;
Conscious Sedation/*methods/psychology/standards
;
Endoscopy, Digestive System/methods/psychology
;
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/*methods/psychology
;
Female
;
Gastroenterology/methods
;
Humans
;
Hypnotics and Sedatives
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Patient Satisfaction
;
Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards/*statistics & numerical data
;
Propofol
;
Quality Improvement
;
Republic of Korea
;
Surveys and Questionnaires