1.Endoscopic Experience Improves Interobserver Agreement in the Grading of Esophagitis by Los Angeles Classification: Conventional Endoscopy and Optimal Band Image System.
Si Hyung LEE ; Byung Ik JANG ; Kyeong Ok KIM ; Seong Woo JEON ; Joong Goo KWON ; Eun Young KIM ; Jin Tae JUNG ; Kyung Sik PARK ; Kwnag Bum CHO ; Eun Soo KIM ; Chang Geun PARK ; Chang Heon YANG
Gut and Liver 2014;8(2):154-159
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Interobserver variation by experience was documented for the diagnosis of esophagitis using the Los Angeles classification. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether interobserver agreement can be improved by higher levels of endoscopic experience in the diagnosis of erosive esophagitis. METHODS: Endoscopic images of 51 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms were obtained with conventional endoscopy and optimal band imaging (OBI). Endoscopists were divided into an expert group (16 gastroenterologic endoscopic specialists guaranteed by the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy) and a trainee group (individuals with fellowships, first year of specialty training in gastroenterology). All endoscopists had no or minimal experience with OBI. GERD was diagnosed using the Los Angeles classification with or without OBI. RESULTS: The mean weighted paired kappa statistics for interobserver agreement in grading erosive esophagitis by conventional endoscopy in the expert group was better than that in the trainee group (0.51 vs 0.42, p<0.05). The mean weighted paired k statistics in the expert group and in the trainee group based on conventional endoscopy with OBI did not differ (0.42, 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: Interobserver agreement in the expert group using conventional endoscopy was better than that in the trainee group. Endoscopic experience can improve the interobserver agreement in the grading of esophagitis using the Los Angeles classification.
Clinical Competence/*standards
;
Esophagitis/classification/*pathology
;
Esophagoscopy/*standards
;
Gastroenterology/*standards
;
Gastroesophageal Reflux/classification/pathology
;
Humans
;
Observer Variation
;
Retrospective Studies
2.Clinical guidelines on nutrition in end-stage liver disease.
Chinese Journal of Hepatology 2019;27(5):330-342
Malnutrition is common in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and is an independent risk factor for survival, therefore it should be treated as the same important guideline as ascites and hepatic encephalopathy. However, up to now, there is no clinical nutrition guideline for patients with ESLD in China. In order to standardize the nutrition treatment, Chinese Society of Hepatology (CSH) and Chinese Society of Gastroenterology (CSGE), Chinese Medical Association(CMA) co-organized and co-developed this guideline. Recommendations on nutritional screening and assessment as well as principles of intervention and management in patients with ESLD were provided to help clinicians make rational decisions on clinical malnutrition.
Ascites
;
China
;
End Stage Liver Disease/physiopathology*
;
Enteral Nutrition/standards*
;
Gastroenterology/standards*
;
Hepatic Encephalopathy
;
Humans
;
Liver Cirrhosis/complications*
;
Malnutrition/physiopathology*
;
Nutrition Assessment
;
Nutritional Status
;
Practice Guidelines as Topic
3.Insufficient Knowledge of Korean Gastroenterologists Regarding the Vaccination of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Yoon Suk JUNG ; Jung Ho PARK ; Hong Joo KIM ; Yong Kyun CHO ; Chong Il SOHN ; Woo Kyu JEON ; Byung Ik KIM ; Dong Il PARK
Gut and Liver 2014;8(3):242-247
BACKGROUND/AIMS: There is an increased risk for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients to develop infections due to the use of immunomodulators and biologics. Several infections are preventable by immunizations. This study investigated the knowledge and awareness of Korean gastroenterologists regarding the vaccination of patients with IBD. METHODS: A self-reported questionnaire was sent by e-mail to the faculty members of tertiary hospitals. Gastroenterologists were asked ten questions regarding the immunization of patients with IBD. A total of 56 gastroenterologists completed the questionnaire. RESULTS: A majority of gastroenterologists (>60%) had rarely or never recorded an immunization history from their patients with IBD. Moreover, 50% to 70% of the gastroenterologists did not know that live vaccines should be avoided in immunosuppressed patients. The most commonly mentioned resistance to vaccinations was "the lack of concern and knowledge regarding vaccination." Gastroenterologists more frequently asked about the immunization history of influenza, pneumococcal, hepatitis A, and hepatitis B vaccines and recommended these vaccines more often than others. CONCLUSIONS: Korean gastroenterologists' awareness and knowledge regarding the vaccination of patients with IBD were very poor. Intensive educational programs on immunization guidelines directed toward gastroenterologists who care for patients with IBD are required to ensure that these patients receive the necessary vaccinations.
Clinical Competence/*standards
;
Female
;
Gastroenterology/*standards
;
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
;
Humans
;
Immunocompetence/physiology
;
Immunocompromised Host/physiology
;
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/*complications
;
Male
;
Medical History Taking/standards
;
Questionnaires
;
Republic of Korea
;
Vaccination/*standards
4.Room for Quality Improvement in Endoscopist-Directed Sedation: Results from the First Nationwide Survey in Korea.
Chang Kyun LEE ; Seok Ho DONG ; Eun Sun KIM ; Sung Hoon MOON ; Hong Jun PARK ; Dong Hoon YANG ; Young Chul YOO ; Tae Hoon LEE ; Sang Kil LEE ; Jong Jin HYUN
Gut and Liver 2016;10(1):83-94
BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study sought to characterize the current sedation practices of Korean endoscopists in real-world settings. METHODS: All active members of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy were invited to complete an anonymous 35-item questionnaire. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 22.7% (1,332/5,860). Propofol-based sedation was the dominant method used in both elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy (55.6%) and colonoscopy (52.6%). The mean satisfaction score for propofol-based sedation was significantly higher than that for standard sedation in both examinations (all p<0.001). The use of propofol was supervised exclusively by endoscopists (98.6%). Endoscopists practicing in nonacademic settings, gastroenterologists, or endoscopists with <10 years of endoscopic practice were more likely to use propofol than were their counterparts (all p<0.001). In total, 27.3% of all respondents performed sedation practices without having undergone sedation training, and 27.4% did so without any formal sedation protocols. The choice of propofol as the dominant sedation method was the only significant predictor of endoscopist experience with serious sedation-related adverse events (odds ratio, 1.854; 95% confidence interval, 1.414 to 2.432). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopist-directed propofol administration is the predominant sedation method used in Korea. This survey strongly suggests that there is much room for quality improvement regarding sedation training and patient vigilance in endoscopist-directed sedation.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Colonoscopy/methods/psychology
;
Conscious Sedation/*methods/psychology/standards
;
Endoscopy, Digestive System/methods/psychology
;
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/*methods/psychology
;
Female
;
Gastroenterology/methods
;
Humans
;
Hypnotics and Sedatives
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Patient Satisfaction
;
Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards/*statistics & numerical data
;
Propofol
;
Quality Improvement
;
Republic of Korea
;
Surveys and Questionnaires