For the vast majority of morbidly obese patients, surgical treatment remains the only effective way proven to maintain weight loss. Currently adjustable gastric banding (AGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass(RYGB) are the methods which are recognized as safe, reliable, effective for weight loss, and has been widely used. Along with the increase in the volume of bariatric operations, patients whose primary bariatric operation is not ideal and who need revision surgery are also increasing. Weight loss failure and postoperative complications are two of the main indications for revisional operation. A series of data indicate that revisional operation is an effective treatment for unsuccessful weight loss and complications of primary operation. Surgeons should choose reasonable, correct operation refer to the initial bariatric operation and results. For most patients, the benefits overweigh the risks.
Bariatric Surgery ; adverse effects ; Gastrectomy ; Gastric Bypass ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight Loss

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has become the gold standard operation for morbid obesity, because effects of LRYGB are quick and lasting. However, there are many potential risks due to the operative complexity and long learning curve. There are early and late complications after LRYGB. If the complications are not diagnosed and treated in time and correctly, serious results even death, may occur. Mortality after LRYGB is 0.87%. It is important for the continous and healthy development of LRYGB that postoperative complications can be diagnosed and managed in time and effectively.
Gastric Bypass ; adverse effects ; methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Obesity, Morbid ; surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; diagnosis ; therapy

Obesity is a serious disorder that increases morbidity and mortality. Primary intervention with life style modification and medication is not always effective for obese patients. Endoscopic management of obesity may be a less invasive, more cost-effective, and relatively safer option than bariatric surgery. Moreover, therapeutic endoscopy is considered to be the primary modality for managing complications that occur after bariatric surgery. In the near future, role of gastroenterologists will be more important in the management of obesity and its related problems.
Bariatric Surgery/adverse effects ; Biliary Tract Diseases/etiology ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal ; Gastric Balloon ; Gastric Bypass ; Humans ; Obesity/*therapy ; *Physician's Role

OBJECTIVETo investigate the prevention and management of complications after laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGB) operation.

METHODSClinical data of 82 cases (9 cases of simple obesity, 55 of obesity complicated with type 2 diabetes, 18 of non-obesity simple type 2 diabetes) undergoing LRYGB in our hospital between May 2010 to May 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Cause of complication was explored and experience was summarized in order to provide reference to clinical practice.

RESULTS RESULTSThere was no mortality and re-admission within 30 days after procedures. Nine patients developed complications. Punctural injury occurred in 1 patient(1.2%) and laparotomy surgery was performed to stop bleedind. Hemorrhage was observed in 4 patients(4.9%, one patients had concurrent anastomotic ulcer) and was cured by either gastrolavage with solution of epinephrine and normal saline or cautery under gastroscope. Anastomotic leakage occurred in one patient(1.2%) which was cured by placing nose-gastro tube immediately after diagnosis of leakage and total enteral nutrition for one month. Anastomotic stricture occurred in 1 patient(1.2%), general peritonitis occurred after balloon dilation and laparoscopic repair was performed to repair the perforation due to dilation. Gastroplegia occurred in two patients(2.4%) and was cured after fasting, gastrointestinal decompression, usage of gastrointestinal prokinetic medications and enteral nutrition. All complications were cured at last. BMI of all patients dropped in vary extent after a follow up of 19.0-35.0(29.1±5.4) months.

CONCLUSIONSComplication after LRYGB operation may be prevented by active preoperative preparation, surgical precision, and intensive postoperative care. Even complications occur, the corresponding treatments are effective.

Anastomotic Leak ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Gastric Bypass ; adverse effects ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Postoperative Complications ; prevention & control ; therapy ; Retrospective Studies

The quantity of cases of metabolic and obesity-related diseases including obesity and type 2 diabetes in China are increasing each year. The total numbers of both existing patients and new patients each year are rated as the highest in the world. A large amount of evidence-based medical reports have shown that bariatric surgery can effectively reduce excessive body weight in patients with morbid obesity, and alleviate the effects of a series of obesity-related metabolic comorbidities, including type 2 diabetes. Laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is currently one of the most widely practiced bariatric surgeries procedures in the world. Although this procedure has been carried out on patients in China for more than 15 years, the standard surgical operation for OAGB has not been subject to relevant guidelines or consensus. In light of this, Chinese Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery (CSMBS) recently initiated the compilation of the first edition of the "Procedural guideline for laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (2022 Edition)", aiming to provide a unified specifications for this procedure. It will provide a reference for surgical operating standards for clinicians in the field of obesity-related metabolic surgery to reduce or avoid complications caused by irregular surgery, and will ultimately benefit more patients.
Bariatric Surgery ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/surgery* ; Gastric Bypass/adverse effects* ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Obesity, Morbid/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an important obesity surgery. The risk of remnant gastric cancer after RYGB for obesity is gaining growing attention from bariatric surgeons and patients with obesity. This systematic review included articles from major databases internationally and domestically that specifically described the remnant gastric cancer after RYGB intervention, a total of 21 cases was subsequently analyzed. The average median time from post-operative RYGB to diagnosis of gastric cancer was 11 years (1-28 years), the duration of gastric cancer symptoms lasted 7 days to 6 years, abdominal pain is the most common (71.4%), especially in the upper abdomen (33.3%), followed by nausea and vomiting (33.3%), over-weight loss (33.3%), and abdominal bloating (28.6%), etc. Neoplasm location was reported to occur in the antrum or the pre-pyloric region (71.4%), with adenocarcinoma being the most common tumor histology observed (71.4%), tumor stage III-IV as the most diagnosed, 38.1% of tumor were deemed to be unresectable, 52.4% of the patients performed subtotal gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy. In addition, a global article investigating the occurrence of esophageal gastric cancer after RYGB in 64 cases revealed the common preoperative medical history include smoking habits (37.5%), alcohol issues (14.0%), GERD (86.0%), presence with Barret esophagus (10.9%), patients that has other malignant tumor medical history (6.3%), first-degree relatives (6.3%), or other family members with gastric esophagus cancer family history. Although the incidence of gastric cancer after RYGB is rare, the increasing prevalence of gastric cancer development is one of great concern. A rise in clinical cases of patients treated with RYGB presents a target for future studies. Risk of gastric cancer after RYGB should be evaluated and considered in high-risk cases.
Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Gastric Bypass/adverse effects* ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Obesity/surgery* ; Obesity, Morbid/surgery* ; Stomach Neoplasms/surgery*

PURPOSE: Bariatric surgery is relatively new in Korea, and studies comparing different bariatric procedures in Koreans are lacking. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) for treating morbidly obese Korean adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we reviewed the medical records of 261 obese patients who underwent different bariatric procedures. Clinical outcomes were measured in terms of weight loss and resolution of comorbidities, such as diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Safety profiles for the procedures were also evaluated. RESULTS: In terms of weight loss, the three procedures showed similar results at 18 months (weight loss in 52.1% for SG, 61.0% for LAGB, and 69.2% for RYGB). Remission of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia was more frequent in patients who underwent RYGB (65.9%, 63.6%, and 100% of patients, respectively). Safety profiles were similar among groups. Early complications occurred in 26 patients (9.9%) and late complications in 32 (12.3%). In the LAGB group, five bands (6.9%) were removed. Among all patients, one death (1/261=0.38%) occurred in the RYGB group due to aspiration pneumonia. CONCLUSION: The three bariatric procedures were comparable in regards to weight-loss outcomes; nevertheless, RYGB showed a higher rate of comorbidity resolution. Bariatric surgery is effective and relatively safe; however, due to complications, some bands had to be removed in the LAGB group and a relatively high rate of reoperations was observed in the RYGB group.
Adult ; Cohort Studies ; Comorbidity ; Female ; *Gastrectomy/adverse effects ; *Gastric Bypass/adverse effects ; Humans ; Male ; Obesity, Morbid/epidemiology/*surgery ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight Loss

PURPOSE: Comprehensive multidisciplinary weight management programs encompassing various conservative measures have shown only modest weight loss results in obese children and adolescents; therefore, bariatric surgery for this population has become a matter of discussion. This study aimed to present our experience with and outcomes for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in morbidly obese Korean adolescents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospectively established database of all patients undergoing bariatric surgery at Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Korea between January 2011 and January 2013 was retrospectively reviewed. Adolescents aged 14 to 20 years were included in the present analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-two adolescents underwent bariatric surgery during the study period; 14 underwent LSG and 8, LRYGB. Of these, 17 were female and 5 were male. The mean age was 19 years. Their mean body weight and body mass index (BMI) before surgery were 115 kg and 40.1 kg/m2. The only postoperative complication was intraluminal bleeding in 1 patient, which was managed conservatively. The mean BMI decreased to 29.1 kg/m2 after a mean follow-up of 10 months. The percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were 19.6, 39.9, 52.6, and 74.2%, respectively. Only 1 patient showed %EWL less than 30% at 12 months after surgery. All patients with diabetes and sleep apnea were cured of their disease, and other comorbidities also improved or resolved after surgery. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery leads to significant short-term weight loss along with resolution of obesity-related comorbidities in obese children and adolescents.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Comorbidity ; Female ; Gastrectomy/*adverse effects ; Gastric Bypass/*adverse effects ; Humans ; Male ; Obesity, Morbid/complications/epidemiology/*surgery ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology ; Prevalence ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), the incretins, is synthesized and released from the duodenum and proximal jejunum. Continual high-fat diet powerfully stimulated GIP secretion, leading to obesity and harmful lipid deposition in islet cells and peripheral tissues, and giving rise to insulin resistance and major disturbances in the secretion of insulin. We can improve Type 2 diabetes by compromising GIP action. The exclusion of proximal small intestine and reduction of GIP secretion may be the important reasons for Type 2 diabetes after gastric bypass surgery.
Animals ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; complications ; surgery ; Diet, High-Fat ; adverse effects ; Gastric Bypass ; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide ; metabolism ; Humans ; Insulin ; metabolism ; Insulin Secretion ; Obesity ; surgery

The emerging endoscopic technologies are proved to be effective treatments for obesity in selected patients and to offer the potential advantages of reduced invasiveness, reversibility and repeatability. From the view of operation principle, endoscopic technologies can be classified as restrictive procedure, malabsorption procedure and endoscopic revision of gastric bypass. Restrictive procedures include intragastric balloon, aspiration therapy, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) and transoral gastroplasty. Intragastric balloon employs space occupying, volume restriction and satiety mechanisms, which is superior to drugs and lifestyle change, but shorter than sleeve and bypass surgery. Aspiration therapy is similar to standard percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, while there are no available data regarding the obesity and metabolic improvement. Compared with traditional bariatric surgery, ESG does not excise gastric tissue with less complications and without weight regain, but it can not be used as an independent operation still now. Transoral gastroplasty is rarely applied clinically whose efficacy and long-term complications need further studies. Malabsorption surgery includes endoscopic duodenojejunal bypass sleeve (EDJBS) and endoscopic gastroduodenojejunal bypass sleeve(EGDJBS). EDJBS may have the similar mechanism like bypass reducing the blood glucose. Even with obvious effect of weight loss, EDJBS has high morbidity of complications and requirements of the skilled operators. EGDJBS, which imitates bypass anatomy changes and belongs to the mixed operation, should be superior to the above procedures in reducing weight theoretically, but due to the lack of clinical data, its short-term and long-term efficacy still need further clinical observation. As compared to the complexity and risks associated with telescopic surgical revision, endoscopic suturing has been confirmed as less invasive and safer for stomal revisions, while its long-term efficacy of reducing weight and improvement of diabetes are not yet clear. Even if long-term efficacy of reducing weight and morbidity of complication in endoscopic bariatric surgery are still indefinite, and clinical trial researches of large sample and long-term follow-up are absent, with the development of endoscopic skill and the gradual clinical application, endoscopic bariatric surgery will provide a new option for the patients of obesity and metabolic diseases.
Bariatric Surgery ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; trends ; Disease Management ; Endoscopy ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Gastric Balloon ; statistics & numerical data ; Gastric Bypass ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Gastroplasty ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Metabolic Diseases ; surgery ; Obesity ; surgery ; Reoperation ; adverse effects ; methods ; statistics & numerical data ; Surgical Stomas ; pathology ; statistics & numerical data ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight Loss