1.Dual-source virtual non-contrast CT of the head: a preliminary study
Wei HUANG ; Yiming XU ; Jin SHAO ; Gang JIN ; Yingli ZHU ; Gaohua GE ; Daoyan LU ; Yu FENG ; Guiyin JING ; Jiyong ZHENG ; Jiandong ZHANG ; Han LIU
Chinese Journal of Radiology 2011;45(3):229-234
Objective To investigate image quality and clinical value of dual-source dual energy virtual non-contrast (VNC) CT of the head. MethodsSixty-two patients suspected of cerebrovascular diseases underwent conventional non-contrast (CNC) CT and dual energy CTA examination of the head with dual-source CT. Virtual non-contrast images were reconstructed using dual energy software. The CT values of gray matter, white matter, cerebrospinal fluid, hyperdense hemorrhagic lesion and hypodense ischemic lesion were compared between CNC and VNC images. A four-score scale was used to assess image quality subjectively. Image noise, radiation dosage and detection rate were compared between CNC and VNC images. Paired t test, Wilcoxon signed ranks test and Chi-square test (McNemar test and Kappa test) were used. Results The CT value on CNC and VNC images, were (43. 3 ± 1.5) and (33. 2 ± 1.3) HU for gray matter (t = 46.98, P < 0. 01), (32. 9 ± 1.3) and (28.8 ± 1.6) HU for white matter(t = 16. 28, P <0.01), (9.0 ± 1.4) and (5.3 ± 1.9) HU for cerebrospinal fluid (t=12.41, P<0.01),(62.8 ±10.0) and (51.3 ± 11.5) HU for hyperdense lesion (Z = -4.37, P < 0.01), (20.7 ±4.7) and (18.0 ±6. 9) HU for hypodense lesion (t = 3. 84, P < 0. 01), respectively. VNC images[(1.63 ±0.34) HU]had more noise than CNC images[(0.99±0.18) HU](Z= -6.41, P<0.01). VNC [(0. 53 ± 0. 08) mSv]had less effective dose than CNC[(1.37 ± 0. 23) mSy](Z= - 6. 45, P < 0. 01).In subjective assessment, VNC images had more noise (2. 7 ± 0. 5 for VNC and 3.9 ± 0. 3 for CNC,Z = -6. 84, P < 0. 01) and skull base-related artifacts (2. 4 ± 0. 9 for VNC and 3.7 ± 0. 5 for CNC,Z = -6. 15, P <0. 01) than CNC images. The gray/white matter contrast (1.3 ± 0. 5 for VNC and 3.3 ±0. 6 for CNC, Z = - 7. 01, P < 0. 01), hyperdense lesion display (3.0 ± 0. 4 for VNC and 4. 0 ± 0. 0 for CNC,Z = -4. 52, P < 0. 01) and hypodense lesion display (3.2 ± 0. 8 for VNC and 3.9 ± 0. 3 for CNC,Z= -3. 12, P <0. 01) on VNC images were lower than those on CNC images. In per-patient analysis,29 cases of hyperdense lesion (hemorrhage) were found on VNC images without misdiagnosis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were all 100. 0% (29/29,33/33, 29/29, 33/33). VNC images had the same detection rate of hyperdense lesions as CNC images (P >0. 05, Kappa = 1. 000) at per-patient level. Twenty-two patients with hypodense ischemic lesions were found on VNC images with one false positive case and two false negative cases. The sensitivity,specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 91.3% (21/23), 97.4%(38/39), 95.5% (21/22) and 95.0% (38/40) respectively. No statistical difference was found in detecting hypodense lesions between VNC and CNC images (χ2 = 0. 00, P > 0. 05, Kappa = 0. 895). In per-lesion analysis, 53 hemorrhage lesions were found on VNC images with false negative results of four lesions and no false positive result. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 93.0% (53/57), 100. 0% (38/38), 100. 0% (53/53) and 90. 5% (38/42)respectively. There was no significant difference in detection rate of hyperdense lesion between VNC and CNC images (χ2 =2. 25, P >0. 05, Kappa =0. 914). Thirty-eight hypodense lesions were found on VNC images with 2 false positive lesions and 13 false negative lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 73.5% (36/49), 96.4% (53/55), 94. 7% (36/38)and 80. 3% (53/66) respectively. The detection rate of hypodense lesion on VNC images was lower than that on CNC images (χ2 = 6. 67 ,P < 0.01, Kappa = 0. 707). Conclusion Compared with CNC images,head VNC images have reduced image quality and radiation dosage. VNC images can replace CNC images potentially in detecting intracranial hemorrhage and provide information for ischemic cerebrovascular diseases to some extent.
2.Clinical effect and safety of Qufeng-Zhike prescription in the treatment of cough variant asthma with severe wind and acute narrow airway syndrome
Wangfeng SHEN ; Meixiu LIU ; Jian CAO ; Gaohua FENG
International Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2021;43(12):1179-1183
Objective:To evaluate the clinical effect and safety of Qufeng-Zhike prescription in the adjuvant treatment of cough variant asthma (CVA) with severe wind and acute narrow airway syndrome. Methods:A total of 82 patients with CVA with severe Wind and acute narrow airway syndrome, meeting the inclusion criteria in the hospital, were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method between September 2018 and September 2020, with 41 in each group. The control group was treated with budesonide formoterol dry powder inhalation, while the observation group was treated Qufeng-Zhike prescription on basis of control group. Both were treated for 8 weeks. Before and after treatment, scores of TCM symptoms was recorded. The forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were detected by spirometer. The peripheral blood eosinophil (EOS) count was detected by full-automatic blood cell analyzer. The level of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) was detected by expiration analyzer. The quality of life was evaluated by Leicester cough questionnaire (LCQ). The adverse events were recorded, and clinical curative effect was evaluated. Results:The differences in total response rate of TCM syndromes between observation group and control group was statistically significant [97.6% (40/41) vs. 82.9% (34/41); χ2=4.986, P=0.026]. At 1, 2 and 8 weeks after treatment, scores of TCM syndromes in observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group ( t=2.104, 5.329, 3.527, P<0.05 or P<0.01). After treatment, FEV1 (2.78 ± 0.41 L vs. 2.56 ± 0.37 L, t=2.551), FVC (3.55 ± 0.50 L vs. 3.24 ± 0.44 L, t=2.980) and PEF (357.58 ± 70.98 L/min vs. 316.30 ± 75.60 L/min, t=2.549) in observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group ( P<0.05), while peripheral blood EOS count [(0.26 ± 0.07)×10 9/L vs. (0.30 ± 0.09)×10 9/L, t=2.246], FeNO level (22.55 ± 7.83 μg/L vs. 28.87 ± 9.36 μg/L, t=3.316) and LCQ score (5.62 ± 1.71 vs. 7.04 ± 2.28, t=3.190) were significantly lower than those in the control group ( P<0.05). During treatment, there were no obvious adverse events (liver and kidney function damage) in either group. Conclusion:The adjuvant treatment with Qufeng-Zhike prescription can help to alleviate allergic reactions, improve clinical symptoms, lung function and quality of life in patients of CVA with severe wind and acute narrow airway syndrome.