1.Effects of the Administration of Probiotics on Fecal Microbiota Diversity and Composition in Healthy Individuals
Choong Kyun NOH ; Bong Sun KIM ; Gana HONG ; Jae Youn CHEONG ; Kwang Jae LEE
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2018;24(3):452-459
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Probiotics are expected to modify the composition of gut microbiota. We aimed to investigate the changes in the composition and diversity of gut microbiota by the administration of probiotics in healthy individuals. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers with age range of 30–42 years provided baseline fecal samples. Subsequently, they took commercially available probiotic capsules (a mixture for Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Enterococcus) for 4 weeks. Fecal samples were collected at 4 weeks of administration and 2 weeks after the stop of administration. Fecal microbiota was analyzed via 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. RESULTS: The mean Shannon index was not significantly altered by the 4-week administration of probiotics (4.365 vs 4.556, P > 0.05). The proportion of Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria was not significantly changed by the 4-week administration of probiotics. At the genus level, the proportions of Lactobacillus (2.138% vs 2.773%, P = 0.028) and Enterococcus (0.022% vs 2.758%, P = 0.004) significantly increased 4 weeks after the administration of probiotics, but reduced 2 weeks after the stop of administration (2.773% vs 3.292%, P = 0.064 and 2.758% vs 0.001%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The diversity of fecal microbiota is not significantly affected by 4 weeks of probiotics administration. The proportion of fecal microbiota at the genus level is significantly altered by the administration of probiotics. However, this effect does not seem to last long, probably because of homeostasis or dietary influence.
Actinobacteria
;
Bacteroidetes
;
Bifidobacterium
;
Capsules
;
Enterococcus
;
Firmicutes
;
Gastrointestinal Microbiome
;
Healthy Volunteers
;
Homeostasis
;
Lactobacillus
;
Microbiota
;
Probiotics
;
Proteobacteria
;
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
2.Clinical Study of StoneTouch(R) Far-infrared Device on Atopic Dermatitis.
Hyun Kyu KIM ; Mi Kyung PARK ; Kui Young PARK ; Myeung Nam KIM ; Gana OH ; Soo Hong SEO ; Hyo Hyun AHN ; Young Chul KYE ; Beom Joon KIM
Korean Journal of Dermatology 2012;50(10):874-879
BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with severe pruritus, but there are only a few effective treatment modalities. Previous studies have demonstrated that infrared light inhibited the development of atopic dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: This study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of StoneTouch(R) infrared device in reducing pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis. METHODS: A total of 92 patients with atopic dermatitis with mild to moderate AD were enrolled in the randomized single-blind, placebo-controlled study. Randomly assigned StoneTouch(R) or sham device was irradiated three times daily for 14 days trial. Efficacy was evaluated by visual analogue scales and investigator's assessments. RESULTS: Pruritus scores using VAS evaluated by patients revealed greater improvement in the StoneTouch(R) infrared treatment group. Assessment of treated skin lesion by physicians showed significant improvement of skin findings in treated group. Transient erythema and mild irritation on the treated site were reported in a few patients. These symptoms were diminished within 1~2 days of treatment. CONCLUSION: StoneTouch(R) infrared device is safe and effective in reducing pruritus in patients with atopic dermatitis.
Dermatitis, Atopic
;
Erythema
;
Humans
;
Light
;
Pruritus
;
Salicylamides
;
Skin
;
Weights and Measures
3.Clinical Study of StoneTouch(R) Far-infrared Device on Atopic Dermatitis.
Hyun Kyu KIM ; Mi Kyung PARK ; Kui Young PARK ; Myeung Nam KIM ; Gana OH ; Soo Hong SEO ; Hyo Hyun AHN ; Young Chul KYE ; Beom Joon KIM
Korean Journal of Dermatology 2012;50(10):874-879
BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with severe pruritus, but there are only a few effective treatment modalities. Previous studies have demonstrated that infrared light inhibited the development of atopic dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: This study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of StoneTouch(R) infrared device in reducing pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis. METHODS: A total of 92 patients with atopic dermatitis with mild to moderate AD were enrolled in the randomized single-blind, placebo-controlled study. Randomly assigned StoneTouch(R) or sham device was irradiated three times daily for 14 days trial. Efficacy was evaluated by visual analogue scales and investigator's assessments. RESULTS: Pruritus scores using VAS evaluated by patients revealed greater improvement in the StoneTouch(R) infrared treatment group. Assessment of treated skin lesion by physicians showed significant improvement of skin findings in treated group. Transient erythema and mild irritation on the treated site were reported in a few patients. These symptoms were diminished within 1~2 days of treatment. CONCLUSION: StoneTouch(R) infrared device is safe and effective in reducing pruritus in patients with atopic dermatitis.
Dermatitis, Atopic
;
Erythema
;
Humans
;
Light
;
Pruritus
;
Salicylamides
;
Skin
;
Weights and Measures