We report a case of gallbladder stone receiving three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which allowed 3D visualization of the laparoscopic operative field and faithfully displayed the 3D anatomic structures of the abdominal organs and the gallbladder triangle. The operation was successfully completed in 32 min without intraoperative complications. 3D laparoscopic surgery allows more precise operation with reduced complications and helps to shorten the operative time, and is suitable for more complex laparoscopic surgery.
Abdominal Cavity ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic ; Cholelithiasis ; surgery ; Gallstones ; Humans ; Intraoperative Complications

OBJECTIVETo assess the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomies (LAH) for intrahepatic bile duct stone.

METHODSLAH was performed in 14 patients with intrahepatic bile duct stone, while another 20 patients with intrahepatic bile duct stone underwent classical operation. Surgical time, blood loss, postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay were recorded.

RESULTSThe operations were successful in all 14 patients who underwent LAH. Surgical time was 190-420 mm [mean (259 +/- 134) mm]. Blood loss during operation was 220-1 000 ml [mean (454.5 +/- 314.2) ml]. No serious postoperative complications occurred. All these 14 patients were discharged with T dragin 7-14 days later, and the mean postoperative hospital stay was (9.2 +/- 3.4) days. In the classical operation group, the surgical time was 125-257 mm [mean (178 +/- 58) mm] and the blood loss was 210-1200 ml [mean (550.9 +/- 348.1) ml] All the patients were discharged with T dragin 9-25 days after operation, and the mean postoperative hospital stay was (13.4 +/- 4.7) days. Surgical time of LAH was longer than classical operation (P < 0.05). Rate of postoperative complications and postoperative hospital stay were decreased in LAH (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). The difference of blood loss during operation was no significance between LAH and classical operation (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSLAH is feasible and safe for selected patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones. As a minimally invasive procedure, it can reduce surgical time, blood loss, hospital stay, and postoperative complications.

Gallstones ; complications ; surgery ; Hepatectomy ; instrumentation ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome

Congenital pulmonary hypoplasia is a rare developmental abnormality of the lung with an incidence rate of around 1/5000 000. As a fatal condition associated with respiratory insufficiency after birth, this disease is rare in adults. We treated a 29-year-old female patient with congenital pulmonary hypoplasia and concurrent of cystic duct calculus in May, 2011 using single-port transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which resulted in a good therapeutic effect comparable to that by routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Abnormalities, Multiple ; Adult ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic ; methods ; Female ; Gallstones ; complications ; surgery ; Humans ; Lung ; abnormalities ; Lung Diseases ; complications

Adult ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic ; methods ; Cholecystitis ; complications ; surgery ; Female ; Gallstones ; complications ; surgery ; Humans ; Treatment Outcome

Various complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy have been reported. We describe a case of intraabdominal abscess formation which was developed two months after the inadvertently spilling of gallstones laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a patient with acute cholelithiasis. The condition was initially found on computed tomography and the diagnosis was confirmed with ultrasound. Although this is a rare complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the spilling of gallstones should be recognized as a potential source of intra-abdominal abscess formation even in a patient presenting months after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We suggest that routine use of the specimen retrieval bag is highly recommended especially for beginners of laparoscopic cholecystectomy during their initial learning period.
Abdominal Abscess ; Abscess* ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic* ; Cholelithiasis ; Diagnosis ; Gallstones* ; Humans ; Learning ; Postoperative Complications ; Ultrasonography

PURPOSE: The laparoscopic cholecystectomy has increasingly been accepted as the procedure of choice for treatment of symptomatic gall stones and chronic cholecystitis. However, its role and its timing in the management of patients with acute cholecystitis remain controversial. This retrospective study was undertaken to compare on early laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a delay one for patients with acute cholecystitis. METHODS: Between January 1995 and June 1999, 15 patients were operated on within 72 hours of symptom onset. Those patients were classified as the early laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. The 18 patients who underwent a delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after a percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy (PTCS) and conservative management were classified as the delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. RESULTS: No significant differences were seen in the conversion rate (1 case in the delayed group), the operation time (early group 107.3 min., delayed group 118.6 min.), postoperative complications (early group 20.0%, delayed group 16.7%), and the postoperative hospital stay (early group 4.7 days, delayed group 7.1 days). The early group had significantly more frequent operation modifications and decreased total hospital stays than the delayed group: 86.7% and 7.0 days, for the early group and 44.4% and 22.8 days for the delayed group. CONCLUSION: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis did not increase the operation time, the morbidity, or the conversion rate. Although this study was not a randomized study and the sample size was small, an early laparoscopic cholecystectomy seems to be safe and feasible for patients with acute cholecystitis, having the benefit of a decreased total hospital stay.
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic* ; Cholecystitis ; Cholecystitis, Acute* ; Cholecystostomy ; Gallstones ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Sample Size

PURPOSE: Open cholecystectomy is preferred to a laparoscopic approach in elderly patients with gallstones, because acute inflammation is more frequent in this age group than in younger patients. However, the surgical morbidity and mortality of an open cholecystectomy are known to be higher than for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients, and to assess its safety and feasibility. METHODS: 289 laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases were enrolled with regard to their clinical parameters. There were 49 patients older and 240 younger than 70 years of age; Groups A and B, respectively. RESULTS: There were no demographic differences between the two groups. The preoperative presentation of acute cholecystitis was higher in Group A (53.1 versus 37.1%, p< 0.05). The average times interval from the initial symptoms to the operation were 36.3 and 50.2 days in Groups A and B, respectively. The rate of combined choledocholithiasis was higher in Group A (20.4 versus 9.2%, p< 0.05). The average operation time was similar in both groups (83.7+/-29.5 versus 83.0+/-29.3minute). The conversion rate from a laparoscopic to an open cholecystectomy was higher in group A (8.2% versus 2.9%, p=0.08). There were no differences in hospital stays and postoperative complications between the two groups. CONCLUSION: From this study, a laparoscopic cholecystectomy is suggested as a safe and effective treatment in elderly patients. Therefore, a laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be initially and actively performed, rather than an open cholecystectomy in elderly patients.
Aged* ; Cholecystectomy ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic* ; Cholecystitis, Acute ; Choledocholithiasis ; Gallstones ; Humans ; Inflammation ; Length of Stay ; Mortality ; Postoperative Complications

While performing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a surgeon may occasionally drop a patient's gall stones into the intraperitoneal cavity or perforate a patient's gallbladder. However, most of the time, the dropped stones are spontaneously absorbed by the body. In some instances, the dropped gallstones may cause late complications in the patient, such as abscesses, the formation of fistulae, or adhesion in the intra-abdominal or extra-abdomial region. We report two cases of recurrent abdominal wall and perihepatic abscesses caused by dropped gall stones during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy with late diagnosis.
Abdominal Wall ; Abscess ; Cholecystectomy ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic ; Delayed Diagnosis ; Fistula ; Gallbladder ; Gallstones ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; Recurrence

BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy is the standard treatment for gallbladder stones and at present is performed in minimally invasive procedures. There are several advantages to a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, so now it is a popular procedure for use in a cholecystectomy. Also, a minilaparotomy cholecystectomy is an alternative method to a traditional open cholecystectomy and results in a smaller incision than a traditional open cholecystectomy. METHODS: We analyzed outcomes following laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy. 74 patients with gallstones were included. 45 patients were treated by a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 29 patients were treated by a minilaparotomy cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Compared to the minilaparotomy cholecystectomy, the laparoscopic cholecystectomy resulted in a shorter mean hospital stay, a faster mean time to diet, and a longer mean operating time. During the first postoperative 24 hours more analgesics were used in the minilaparotomy cholecystectomy than in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and the laparoscopic cholecystectomy was more expensive than the minilaparotomy cholecystectomy. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients receiving a lapaaroscopic cholecystectomy and 1 patient receiving a minilaparotomy cholecystectomy. Conversion from a laparoscopic cholecystectomy to a traditional open cholecystectomy was necessary in 2 patients; no conversion to a traditional cholecystectomy was necessary in the minilaparotomy cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: This study has proven the advantages of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy to be shorter hospitalization, less pain, and better cosmetic effect. Also, a minilaparotomy cholecystectomy has the advantages of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and can be performed more safely.
Analgesics ; Cholecystectomy* ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic* ; Diet ; Gallbladder ; Gallstones ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Laparotomy* ; Length of Stay ; Postoperative Complications

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the safety and efficacy between endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (EPBD) and endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy ( EST) for common bile duct stones using meta-analysis method.

METHODSRandomizd controlled trials comparing EPBD with EST for common bile duct stones and published from January 1990 to July 2012 were recruited. This meta-analysis was conducted to estimate short-term and long-term complications. Fixed random effect model or random effect model was established to analyze the data.

RESULTSTwelve randomizd controlled trials were included in this analysis. These studies included 1865 patients, 925 of them were treated with EPBD and 940 were treated with EST. The analysis of basic characteristics of these included studies showed that: compared to EST, patients in the EPBD group were younger (OR = -1.16, 95% CI: -1.49 to -0.84, P = 0.00), while in two groups, there were no significant difference (P > 0.05) in gender proportion, average size of stones, number of gallstones, previous cholecystectomy, the number of merged duodenal diverticulum, common bile duct diameter, the total follow-up time. Also, compared to EST, the overall stone clearance in the EPBD group was lower (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.96, P = 0.03), pancreatitis incidence was higher (OR = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.61 to 4.43, P = 0.00), incidence of bleeding (OR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.34, P = 0.00), acute cholecystitis (OR= 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.84, P = 0.02), total long-term complication rate (OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.77, P = 0.01), stone recurrence rate more than a year were lower (OR= 0.48, 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.90, P = 0.02). While in two groups, there were no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the stone removal on 1 '' attempt, the total near-term complications and acute cholangitis.

CONCLUSIONSOn the basis of lower rates of bleeding, EPBD seems to be preferred strategy over EST for endoscopic remove of common bile duct stones in patients who have coagulopathy. Although stone recurrence rate more than a year of EPBD is lower, but the overall stone clearance rate is lower and the risk of pancreatitis is higher than that of EST.

Dilatation ; Gallstones ; surgery ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic ; Treatment Outcome