The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of using gadolinium-chelates for digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with contraindications to iodinated contrast material, and to assess the clinically effective concentration of gadolinium (Gd). Gadopentetate dimeglumine and iopromide were used in density measurements. Using 20 mL disposable syringes, serial dilutions of Gd and iopromide with saline were performed. Computed tomography scanning was done and the attenuation of each was recorded as mean Hounsfield units using region of interest analysis. Clinical trials were done in twelve patients with the following types of angiogram or intervention: hemodialysis access, percutaneous biliary drainage, percutaneous nephrostomy, cerebral angiography and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma. The density of 1 : 1 diluted Gd was nearly equal to that of 1 : 4 dilution of iopromide, and that of pure Gd was similar to or less than that of 1 : 1 dilution of iopromide. Serum creatinine level was not elevated in any of the patients. Gd is a safe alternative agent in patients with contraindications to iodinated contrast materials. Pure Gd without dilution is the most clinically useful concentration.
Angiography, Digital Subtraction/*methods ; *Contrast Media/adverse effects ; Feasibility Studies ; Gadolinium DTPA/adverse effects/*diagnostic use ; Human ; Safety

OBJECTIVE: We wanted to prospectively assess the adverse events and hemodynamic effects associated with an intravenous adenosine infusion in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease and who were undergoing cardiac MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty-eight patients (64 +/- 9 years) received adenosine (140 microg/kg/min) during cardiac MRI. Before and during the administration, the heart rate, systemic blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were monitored using a MRI-compatible system. We documented any signs and symptoms of potential adverse events. RESULTS: In total, 47 out of 168 patients (28%) experienced adverse effects, which were mostly mild or moderate. In 13 patients (8%), the adenosine infusion was discontinued due to intolerable dyspnea or chest pain. No high grade atrioventricular block, bronchospasm or other life-threatening adverse events occurred. The hemodynamic measurements showed a significant increase in the heart rate during adenosine infusion (69.3 +/- 11.7 versus 82.4 +/- 13.0 beats/min, respectively; p < 0.001). A significant but clinically irrelevant increase in oxygen saturation occurred during adenosine infusion (96 +/- 1.9% versus 97 +/- 1.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). The blood pressure did not significantly change during adenosine infusion (systolic: 142.8 +/- 24.0 versus 140.9 +/- 25.7 mmHg; diastolic: 80.2 +/- 12.5 mmHg versus 78.9 +/- 15.6, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the safety of adenosine infusion during cardiac MRI. A considerable proportion of all patients will experience minor adverse effects and some patients will not tolerate adenosine infusion. However, all adverse events can be successfully managed by a radiologist. The increased heart rate during adenosine infusion highlights the need to individually adjust the settings according to the patient, e.g., the number of slices of myocardial perfusion imaging.
Adenosine/administration & dosage/*adverse effects ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Blood Pressure/drug effects ; Contrast Media/diagnostic use ; Coronary Disease/*diagnosis ; Female ; Gadolinium DTPA/diagnostic use ; Heart Rate/drug effects ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Infusions, Intravenous ; *Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Oxygen/blood ; Prospective Studies ; Vasodilator Agents/administration & dosage/*adverse effects

This study describes the first case of biliary peritonitis after radiofrequency ablation diagnosed by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA), a hepatocyte-specific MR imaging contrast agent. The image acquired 300 minutes after the administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA was useful to make a definite diagnosis and to identify the pathway of bile leakage. It is important to decide on the acquisition timing with consideration of the predicted location of bile duct injury.
Aged, 80 and over ; Bile Duct Diseases/*diagnosis/etiology ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis/surgery ; Catheter Ablation/*adverse effects ; Contrast Media/diagnostic use ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gadolinium DTPA/*diagnostic use ; Hepatectomy/adverse effects/methods ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis/*surgery ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging/*methods ; Male ; Peritonitis/*diagnosis/etiology