OBJECTIVE<p style="text-align: justify;" data-mce-style="text-align: justify;">The objective of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of a Filipino translation of the Catquest 9-SF questionnaire for measuring the patient reported visual outcomes of Filipino cataract patients in a tertiary hospital.p>METHODS<p style="text-align: justify;" data-mce-style="text-align: justify;">The English version of the Catquest-9SF questionnaire was translated into Tagalog or Filipino, back translated into English and finally translated again into Filipino using the WHO forward backward-forward translation technique. The final Filipino version of the questionnaire was administered to 90 patients who were awaiting cataract surgery and fit the inclusion criteria. The response patterns as well as the overall construct of the Filipino questionnaire were evaluated using the Rasch model in terms of specific components for reliability and validity.p>RESULTS<p style="text-align: justify;" data-mce-style="text-align: justify;">The Filipino version of the Catquest-9SF showed high reliability for person and item components based on Person Separation Index (PSI). All questions showed good fit statistics based on Show Mean Square (MNSQ), as well as unidimensionality using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Differential Item Functioning (DIF) was not seen across all age groups, while only one question showed DIF among different sex groups.p>CONCLUSION<p style="text-align: justify;" data-mce-style="text-align: justify;">The results of the Rasch analysis show good overall functioning of the Filipino version of the Catquest-9SF. It is a valid and reliable tool that can be used to measure the visual disability outcomes of Filipino cataract patients.p>
Human ; Cataract ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Quality Of Life

Background: Maldistribution and dearth of primary care practitioners is a continuing health human resource problem of many countries particularly in developing countries like the Philippines. The call to strengthen primary care for better health outcomes is a battle-cry that has never been resolved due to lack of physicians, trained and untrained, serving the rural areas. Family physicians are primarily the workforce in primary care settings but few medical graduates pursue this kind of career track. This study aimed to describe the career choices of medical students and factors that influenced them including their perspectives of family medicine as career choice. Methods: On-line survey using google form was used to reach a total of 1800 medical students from 41 medical schools across the country in November 2016. Purposive sampling was done to allocate at least 40 students per school coordinated through the APMC Student Network representatives. They were sent with a link of the pre-validated questionnaire on career choices after medical school and reasons influencing their career choices based from prior studies. Results: Of the 1,800 students, 1010 (81%) completed the questionnaire. Majority opted residency training (92%) after graduation and few pursue rural health practice (14%). Family medicine ranked 10th as first choice for training with IM and surgery consistently the top choices regardless if it is the first, second or third choice. Family medical needs influenced these choices. Family medicine was considered by majority as the primary care providers (94.1%) but lack of emphasis on it in their curriculum was experienced by most. Conclusion Most of the medical students want to pursue residency training in internal medicine and surgery while few in family medicine. Their choice of training is influenced by medical needs of the family. Family medicine as primary care provider was recognized but most experienced of lack emphasis in their medical curriculum.
Career Choice ; Primary Health Care