No abstract available.
Fistula*

No abstract available.
Ductus Arteriosus, Patent*

No abstract available.
Adenoma, Pleomorphic ; Mouth Mucosa

No abstract available.

No abstract available.

No abstract available.
Carcinoma, Verrucous ; Lip

BACKGROUND: Bilateral interruption of the upper thoracic sympathetic chain at T2 level represents a selective cure for essential hyperhidrosis. Following the surgical sympathectomy, significant changes in pulmonary function has been observed. Our hypothesis was that thoracic sympathectomy may increase airway resistance during mechanical ventilation and which may be attenuated by the anticholinergics. METHODS: 21 patients with essential hyperhidrosis in ASA physical status class 1 under going thoracoscopic sympathectomy, they were randomizely divided into two groups: glycopyrrolate premedication group (n=13) and non-premedication, control group (n=9). Glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg was administered 30 minutes before the induction of anesthesia. Blood pressure, heart rate, peak airway pressure, plateau pressure were measured at before and immediate after sympathectomy. Respiratory compliance and resistance were calculated. RESULTS: After thoracoscopic sympathectomy, there was significant increase in mean peak airway pressure (15 +/- 3 vs 18 +/- 3 cmH2O, P<0.05) and decrease in respiratory compliance (52 +/- 12 vs 45 +/- 10 ml/cmH2O, P<0.05) compared to baseline. However there was no significant difference between glycopyrolate premedication group and non-premedication group. Conclusion: Thoracoscopic upper dorsal sympathectomy in patients with essential hyperhidrosis causes increase peak airway pressure and decrease the compliance of respiratory system during mechanical ventilation.
Airway Resistance ; Anesthesia ; Blood Pressure ; Cholinergic Antagonists ; Compliance ; Glycopyrrolate ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Hyperhidrosis* ; Premedication ; Respiration, Artificial ; Respiratory System ; Sympathectomy*

The purpose of this study was to observe the additive effect of glycopyrrolate and neostigmine on the heart rate in healthy young volunteer. The authors administered glycopyrrolate and neostigmine intravenously, and compared its effect on the heart rate in both drugs. The results were as follows: 1) A small dose of glycopyrrolate(0.1mg) showed a slight decrease in the heart rate. 2) Neostigmine(0.5mg) showed a significant decrease in the heart rate. 3)glycopyrrolate(0.1mg) 10minutes after glycopyrrolate(0.1mg), showed a marked increase in the heart rate. 4) Neostigmine(0.5mg), 10 min. after glycopyrrolate(0.1mg), showed a significant decrease in the heart rate. 5) glycopyrrolate(0.1mg), 10 min. after neostigmine(0.5mg), showed a decrease in the heart rate. 6) The above results suggest that the site of action of glycopyrrolate is at variance with that of neostigmine.

No abstract available.

BACKGROUND: The speed of injection of local anesthetic solutions into the subarachnoid space may influence the spread of these agents in the cerebrospinal fluid by the amount of turbulence generated, especially with large volume. To determine the proper injection speed of anesthetics in hypobaric spinal anesthesia on jack-knife position, the anesthetic level and duration were measured with the fast or slow injection speed. METHODS: Twenty patients for perianal surgery in jack-knife position under hypobaric spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Tetracaine (0.1%) in distilled water 5 ml was administered to all the patients. Group I patients received the drug with the speed of injection as 5 ml/20 sec (15 ml/min) and the others (Group II) as 5 ml/4 min (1.25 ml/min). The mean arterial pressures and heart rates at the preanesthetic period, and 5, 10, 15 and 20 min after the end of injection were measured. The anesthetic levels at 5, 10, 15 and 20 min after the injection and anesthesia duration were measured. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in mean arterial pressures, heart rates and anesthetic duration between two groups. The anesthetic level 20 min after the injection was higher in Group I than Group II, and not different at the other time sequences. CONCLUSION: At the injection speed within 1.25-15 ml/min in hypobaric spinal anesthesia on jack-knife position at 15o head-down, we acquired appropriate anesthetic level and duration for perianal surgery without any undesirable effects.
Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, Spinal* ; Anesthetics ; Arterial Pressure ; Cerebrospinal Fluid ; Head-Down Tilt* ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Subarachnoid Space ; Tetracaine* ; Water