Objective:To explore the effect of Chin-down-plus-larynx-tightening maneuver on improving choking cough and swallowing function in patients after esophageal cancer surgery.Methods:A total of 121 patients with esophageal cancer surgery had been randomly divided into control group and observation group from November 2018 to September 2019. Starting from feeding after surgery, the head and neck were in normal habits when swallowing in the control group, and the observation group used Chin-down-plus-larynx-tightening maneuver to perform swallowing training. The feeding process of two groups was observed and recorded for one week. One week after eating, the water swallowing test and M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory for Gastrointestinal cancer (MDASI-GI) were used to evaluate the difference of swallowing function and gastrointestinal symptoms between the two groups.Results:During one week period of feeding, the incidence of choking cough in observation group was 3.39%, (2/59), which was significantly lower than that in the control group (14.52%, 9/62)( χ2 value was 4.53, P=0.033). After one week of feeding, the swallowing function showed significant difference ( Z value was 6.07, P=0.014), the gastrointestinal symptoms and the degree of life interference caused by gastrointestinal symptoms of observation group scored 2.57 ± 0.81, 1.76 ± 0.84, lower than those of the control group (4.25 ± 1.54, 2.18 ± 1.24), and the difference was statistically significant( t values were -7.56, -2.17, P<0.05). Conclusions:The Chin-down-plus-larynx-tightening maneuver can promote recovery of postoperative swallowing function in patients with esophageal cancer, reduce the incidence of choking cough, and help reduce the symptoms of digestive tract, and then raise the level of patient′s clinical prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is a more effective approach and has the potential to detect lung cancer more accurately. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to estimate the accuracy of population-based screening studies primarily assessing baseline LDCT screening for lung cancer. METHODS: MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica Database, and Web of Science were searched for articles published up to April 10, 2022. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the data of true positives, false-positives, false negatives, and true negatives in the screening test were extracted. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 was used to evaluate the quality of the literature. A bivariate random effects model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated by using hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristics analysis. Heterogeneity between studies was measured using the Higgins I2 statistic, and publication bias was evaluated using a Deeks' funnel plot and linear regression test. RESULTS: A total of 49 studies with 157,762 individuals were identified for the final qualitative synthesis; most of them were from Europe and America (38 studies), ten were from Asia, and one was from Oceania. The recruitment period was 1992 to 2018, and most of the subjects were 40 to 75 years old. The analysis showed that the AUC of lung cancer screening by LDCT was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99), and the overall sensitivity and specificity were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94-0.98) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.91), respectively. The funnel plot and test results showed that there was no significant publication bias among the included studies. CONCLUSIONS Baseline LDCT has high sensitivity and specificity as a screening technique for lung cancer. However, long-term follow-up of the whole study population (including those with a negative baseline screening result) should be performed to enhance the accuracy of LDCT screening.
Humans ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging* ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Mass Screening ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of lung cancer screening in urban areas of Henan province by low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) from 2013 to 2017. Methods: A cluster sampling method was used to select the residents of 40-74 years old in Henan province to investigate the risk factors and conduct lung cancer risk assessment. Subjects with high risk of lung cancer received LDCT for screening. Results: A total of 179 002 residents completed the lung cancer risk assessment, and 35 672 subjects were identified as high risk of lung cancer, with a high risk rate of 19.93%. A total of 13 383 subjects with high risk received LDCT, and the screening rate was 37.52%. There were 786 cases diagnosed as positive nodules, and the detection rate was 5.87%. Among them, 755 cases of solid/partial solid nodule were ≥5 mm, 23 cases of non-solid nodules were ≥8 mm, 8 cases were intratracheal nodules, and 115 cases were diagnosed as suspicious lung cancer. The detection rate in males was 6.74%, which was higher than 5.02% in females. The detection rate was positively related with age (P<0.05). Conclusions The application of LDCT is a useful screening method which can elevate the early detection rate of positive nodules and other related diseases in lungs. In the future, males and older populations should be paid more attention to improve screening efficacy.