The purpose of this study is to investigate whether regular visits to community pharmacies to take medications contributes to the prevention of frailty in the elderly and whether it also contributes to the improvement of leftover medications. The patients showed a significant increase in the number of steps taken after interventions, and the frailty index using J-CHS criteria also showed a significant improvement after interventions. In addition, two patients were found to have leftover medications, but improvement was observed after interventions. In the post-intervention patient satisfaction survey, all seven patients responded positively to the following questions: “Effectiveness of medication management,” “Improvement in medication adherence,” “Improvement in physical condition,” “Increase in the number of outings,” “Increase in the amount of exercise,” and “Appropriateness of the number of visits.” On the other hand, two patients responded negatively to the following questions: “Improvement of sleep,” and “Improvement of diet.” As a result, it can be inferred that this initiative is beneficial for the prevention of frailty in elderly patients.

The purpose of this study was to clarify the factor structure of the diversifying interpersonal work of pharmacists and its influential factors. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted for pharmacists registered with an internet research company. We collected data on respondents’ basic characteristics (gender and age), years of experience as a pharmacist, whether the respondents were certified as pharmacists, home-care experience, participation in study sessions and workshops, and experiences related to medication support. Factor analysis revealed three main factors from 26 items regarding pharmacists’ interpersonal work: Factor 1, “basic abilities of patient medication record management and medication counseling,” Factor 2, “clinical knowledge and assessment ability,” and Factor 3, “cooperation and support system.” Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant association between age and Factor 1 (β=−0.131, P<0.001). Home-care experience was associated with Factor 2 (β=0.076, P=0.013) and Factor 3 (β=0.115, P<0.001). Participation in study sessions and workshops were significantly associated with all the factors (Factor 1: β=0.103, P=0.001, Factor 2: β=0.247, P<0.001, Factor 3: β=0.238, P<0.001). This study clarified the factor structure of interpersonal work performed by community pharmacists. It is suggested that providing educational programs based on pharmacists’ ages and strengthening regional cooperation such as home medical care are necessary to standardize the quality of pharmacists’ interpersonal work.

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of pharmacists in clinical settings to assess the status and extent of challenges experienced by pharmacists in providing drug information to pregnant and breastfeeding women. The survey was completed anonymously via the internet using a structured questionnaire. The survey items included basic respondent characteristics, their experiences, attitude toward providing information to pregnant and breastfeeding women, and efforts toward obtaining relevant knowledge. Out of the 1,000 participating pharmacists, 96.8% received inquiries about pregnancy and breastfeeding. However, 92.5% of them recognized that the consultations they provided to pregnant and breastfeeding patients were not sufficient. The reasons for the sentiment were as follows: a lack of basic knowledge regarding pregnancy and breastfeeding and the effects of medications on pregnancy and breastfeeding (37.9% and 37.7%, respectively), a feeling that it is difficult to select appropriate information to share with patients (32.1%), lack of detailed information in the drug package insert (26.0%), lack of opportunities to learn about drug treatment during pregnancy and breastfeeding (20.9%), and the notion that pregnancy and breastfeeding are delicate and difficult topics to discuss (19.8%). While most pharmacists provided consultations regarding pregnancy and breastfeeding, only 7.5% felt that they provided sufficient consultations on this topic. Some pharmacists were concerned about their limited knowledge of pregnancy and breastfeeding. They also had difficulty addressing pregnancy and breastfeeding-related subjects, and communicating with pregnant and breastfeeding women. Pharmacists should advance their education by including elements regarding informed choice and make use of appropriate sources of information.

Objective: The study aimed to identify potential components of the collaboration between hospital and community pharmacists from the perspective of pharmacists in municipal hospitals. Methods: Following a preliminary study, an online survey was conducted among pharmacy directors and those on an equivalent managerial level in municipal hospital pharmacies. The survey used a 5-point Likert scale with 32 items about the components of collaboration between hospital and community pharmacists. We performed an exploratory analysis and structural equation modeling of the data. Results: The analysis proposed a five-factor model (“Organizational climate,” “Information sharing system,” “Community support system,” “Interest in healthcare policy,” and “Understanding of healthcare policy”), which consisted of 17 items. Subsequent confirmation with structural equation modeling created a model with good fit (in terms of partial evaluation and overall goodness of fit) with a chi-square of 86.218, P-value of 0.564, goodness of fit index of 0.907, adjusted goodness of fit index of 0.857, and other good model fit indices (comparative fit index of 1.000 and root mean square error of approximation of 0.000). Discussion: This study identified two core universal concepts and three concepts adhering to the current medical context, that seem to guide the behavior of municipal hospital pharmacists─who are major players in community healthcare─in their collaboration with community pharmacists.