Objective: To elucidate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics for distinguishing solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) from desmoid tumors (DTs). Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of 66 consecutive patients with histopathologically proven SFT (n = 34; 13 males and 21 females; mean age, 52.0 ± 17.1 years) or DT (n = 32; 11 males and 21 females; mean age, 39.0 ± 21.3 years) was conducted. The two groups were quantitatively compared in terms of the size, signal intensity ratio (SIR), and apparent diffusion coefficient value. For qualitative analysis, the tumor location, boundary, shape, internal uniformity, predominant signal intensity, T1-weighted images (T1WI) characteristics (hyperintense area), T2-weighted images (T2WI) characteristics (hypointense area, marked hyperintense area, flow void, band sign, and yin-yang sign), and contrast-enhanced T1WI characteristics (unenhanced area and degree of enhancement) were compared between the two groups. Multiple stepwise logistic regression analyses were conducted to distinguish between the SFT and DT. Results: T1 (P = 0.010) and T2 (P = 0.026) SIRs were higher in SFTs than in DTs. Hyperintense areas on T1WI (P < 0.001), marked hyperintense areas on T2WI (P = 0.025), and flow void (P = 0.025) were more frequently noted in SFTs. On T1WI, the solid component predominantly revealed hyperintensity in SFTs and isointensity in DTs (P < 0.001). Indistinct tumor boundary (P < 0.001), hypointense area on T2WI (P < 0.001), and band sign (P < 0.001) were more frequently observed in DTs. Multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that the hyperintense area on T1WI (odds ratio favoring SFT, 12.80, P = 0.002) and band sign (odds ratio favoring DT, 0.03; P < 0.001) were independent predictors. Conclusion MRI characteristics can help distinguish SFT from DT. The presence of a hyperintense area relative to the skeletal muscle on T1WI in SFTs and the band sign on T2WI in DTs are important MRI features.

Objective: To elucidate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics for distinguishing solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) from desmoid tumors (DTs). Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of 66 consecutive patients with histopathologically proven SFT (n = 34; 13 males and 21 females; mean age, 52.0 ± 17.1 years) or DT (n = 32; 11 males and 21 females; mean age, 39.0 ± 21.3 years) was conducted. The two groups were quantitatively compared in terms of the size, signal intensity ratio (SIR), and apparent diffusion coefficient value. For qualitative analysis, the tumor location, boundary, shape, internal uniformity, predominant signal intensity, T1-weighted images (T1WI) characteristics (hyperintense area), T2-weighted images (T2WI) characteristics (hypointense area, marked hyperintense area, flow void, band sign, and yin-yang sign), and contrast-enhanced T1WI characteristics (unenhanced area and degree of enhancement) were compared between the two groups. Multiple stepwise logistic regression analyses were conducted to distinguish between the SFT and DT. Results: T1 (P = 0.010) and T2 (P = 0.026) SIRs were higher in SFTs than in DTs. Hyperintense areas on T1WI (P < 0.001), marked hyperintense areas on T2WI (P = 0.025), and flow void (P = 0.025) were more frequently noted in SFTs. On T1WI, the solid component predominantly revealed hyperintensity in SFTs and isointensity in DTs (P < 0.001). Indistinct tumor boundary (P < 0.001), hypointense area on T2WI (P < 0.001), and band sign (P < 0.001) were more frequently observed in DTs. Multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that the hyperintense area on T1WI (odds ratio favoring SFT, 12.80, P = 0.002) and band sign (odds ratio favoring DT, 0.03; P < 0.001) were independent predictors. Conclusion MRI characteristics can help distinguish SFT from DT. The presence of a hyperintense area relative to the skeletal muscle on T1WI in SFTs and the band sign on T2WI in DTs are important MRI features.

Objective: To elucidate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics for distinguishing solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) from desmoid tumors (DTs). Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of 66 consecutive patients with histopathologically proven SFT (n = 34; 13 males and 21 females; mean age, 52.0 ± 17.1 years) or DT (n = 32; 11 males and 21 females; mean age, 39.0 ± 21.3 years) was conducted. The two groups were quantitatively compared in terms of the size, signal intensity ratio (SIR), and apparent diffusion coefficient value. For qualitative analysis, the tumor location, boundary, shape, internal uniformity, predominant signal intensity, T1-weighted images (T1WI) characteristics (hyperintense area), T2-weighted images (T2WI) characteristics (hypointense area, marked hyperintense area, flow void, band sign, and yin-yang sign), and contrast-enhanced T1WI characteristics (unenhanced area and degree of enhancement) were compared between the two groups. Multiple stepwise logistic regression analyses were conducted to distinguish between the SFT and DT. Results: T1 (P = 0.010) and T2 (P = 0.026) SIRs were higher in SFTs than in DTs. Hyperintense areas on T1WI (P < 0.001), marked hyperintense areas on T2WI (P = 0.025), and flow void (P = 0.025) were more frequently noted in SFTs. On T1WI, the solid component predominantly revealed hyperintensity in SFTs and isointensity in DTs (P < 0.001). Indistinct tumor boundary (P < 0.001), hypointense area on T2WI (P < 0.001), and band sign (P < 0.001) were more frequently observed in DTs. Multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that the hyperintense area on T1WI (odds ratio favoring SFT, 12.80, P = 0.002) and band sign (odds ratio favoring DT, 0.03; P < 0.001) were independent predictors. Conclusion MRI characteristics can help distinguish SFT from DT. The presence of a hyperintense area relative to the skeletal muscle on T1WI in SFTs and the band sign on T2WI in DTs are important MRI features.

Objective: To elucidate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics for distinguishing solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) from desmoid tumors (DTs). Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of 66 consecutive patients with histopathologically proven SFT (n = 34; 13 males and 21 females; mean age, 52.0 ± 17.1 years) or DT (n = 32; 11 males and 21 females; mean age, 39.0 ± 21.3 years) was conducted. The two groups were quantitatively compared in terms of the size, signal intensity ratio (SIR), and apparent diffusion coefficient value. For qualitative analysis, the tumor location, boundary, shape, internal uniformity, predominant signal intensity, T1-weighted images (T1WI) characteristics (hyperintense area), T2-weighted images (T2WI) characteristics (hypointense area, marked hyperintense area, flow void, band sign, and yin-yang sign), and contrast-enhanced T1WI characteristics (unenhanced area and degree of enhancement) were compared between the two groups. Multiple stepwise logistic regression analyses were conducted to distinguish between the SFT and DT. Results: T1 (P = 0.010) and T2 (P = 0.026) SIRs were higher in SFTs than in DTs. Hyperintense areas on T1WI (P < 0.001), marked hyperintense areas on T2WI (P = 0.025), and flow void (P = 0.025) were more frequently noted in SFTs. On T1WI, the solid component predominantly revealed hyperintensity in SFTs and isointensity in DTs (P < 0.001). Indistinct tumor boundary (P < 0.001), hypointense area on T2WI (P < 0.001), and band sign (P < 0.001) were more frequently observed in DTs. Multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that the hyperintense area on T1WI (odds ratio favoring SFT, 12.80, P = 0.002) and band sign (odds ratio favoring DT, 0.03; P < 0.001) were independent predictors. Conclusion MRI characteristics can help distinguish SFT from DT. The presence of a hyperintense area relative to the skeletal muscle on T1WI in SFTs and the band sign on T2WI in DTs are important MRI features.

Objective: To elucidate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics for distinguishing solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) from desmoid tumors (DTs). Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of 66 consecutive patients with histopathologically proven SFT (n = 34; 13 males and 21 females; mean age, 52.0 ± 17.1 years) or DT (n = 32; 11 males and 21 females; mean age, 39.0 ± 21.3 years) was conducted. The two groups were quantitatively compared in terms of the size, signal intensity ratio (SIR), and apparent diffusion coefficient value. For qualitative analysis, the tumor location, boundary, shape, internal uniformity, predominant signal intensity, T1-weighted images (T1WI) characteristics (hyperintense area), T2-weighted images (T2WI) characteristics (hypointense area, marked hyperintense area, flow void, band sign, and yin-yang sign), and contrast-enhanced T1WI characteristics (unenhanced area and degree of enhancement) were compared between the two groups. Multiple stepwise logistic regression analyses were conducted to distinguish between the SFT and DT. Results: T1 (P = 0.010) and T2 (P = 0.026) SIRs were higher in SFTs than in DTs. Hyperintense areas on T1WI (P < 0.001), marked hyperintense areas on T2WI (P = 0.025), and flow void (P = 0.025) were more frequently noted in SFTs. On T1WI, the solid component predominantly revealed hyperintensity in SFTs and isointensity in DTs (P < 0.001). Indistinct tumor boundary (P < 0.001), hypointense area on T2WI (P < 0.001), and band sign (P < 0.001) were more frequently observed in DTs. Multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that the hyperintense area on T1WI (odds ratio favoring SFT, 12.80, P = 0.002) and band sign (odds ratio favoring DT, 0.03; P < 0.001) were independent predictors. Conclusion MRI characteristics can help distinguish SFT from DT. The presence of a hyperintense area relative to the skeletal muscle on T1WI in SFTs and the band sign on T2WI in DTs are important MRI features.

A statistical study on effects of laser-puncture was carried out. In addition, an attempt was made to compare between the effect of acupuncture and this method. The treatments were under-taken for various chronic and acute cases with pain. In the laser-puncture treatment, two types of laser (i, e. low energy 10mW laser and 70mW sharp laser) were used. Laser-beam was given to 20-30 points which were located in painful areas, innervating nerve areas and remote areas for 40 sec for each.
In the open study, 10mW laser-puncture was effective (including ‘rather effective’) in 64% of the cases, and 70mW laser-puncture 73%. In the blind test, ‘the day’ evaluation showed that the laser-punctures were more effective than placebo treatment: 10mW laser-puncture was effective in 80% of the cases, and placebo in 67%. 70mW laser-puncture was effective in 87% of them, and placebo in 80%. In situ acupuncture was effective in 97%, and no effect was seen in 7%.
Only ‘the day’ evaluation in the open study showed that 70mW laser-puncture was more effective than 10mW one. In the blind best, 10mW and 70mW laser-puncture were more effective than placebo, and in situ acupuncture was more effective than the laser-punctures, but there were no significant differences among the three treatmets.