1.Transscleral LED illumination pen.
Christian LINGENFELDER ; Frank KOCH ; Philipp KOELBL ; Pia KLANTE ; Martin HESSLING
Biomedical Engineering Letters 2017;7(4):311-315
Existing light sources for intraocular illumination are often bulky and expensive and pose a risk for the patient, because light guides are inserted in the eye through incisions and if the tip of these light guides get too close to the retina, the retina can be damaged photochemically within minutes or even seconds. Therefore a new, safe and simple device for intraocular illumination is developed and evaluated for its thermal and photochemical risks to the patient. It consists of a white LED which is integrated into a pen like holder. This device is pressed against the sclera by the physician who seeks for illumination during surgery or for diagnostic purposes. The LED light is transmitted through the sclera without the need for an incision. Considering the relevant standards, the device poses no harm to the patient, and in tests with the authors' own eyes a sufficient intraocular illumination is reached. The proposed device is quite simple but easy to handle and very gentle for the patient.
Humans
;
Lighting*
;
Retina
;
Sclera
2.U6 is unsuitable for normalization of serum miRNA levels in patients with sepsis or liver fibrosis.
Fabian BENZ ; Christoph RODERBURG ; David VARGAS CARDENAS ; Mihael VUCUR ; Jeremie GAUTHERON ; Alexander KOCH ; Henning ZIMMERMANN ; Jorn JANSSEN ; Lukas NIEUWENHUIJSEN ; Mark LUEDDE ; Norbert FREY ; Frank TACKE ; Christian TRAUTWEIN ; Tom LUEDDE
Experimental & Molecular Medicine 2013;45(9):e42-
MicroRNA (miRNA) levels in serum have recently emerged as potential novel biomarkers for various diseases. miRNAs are routinely measured by standard quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR); however, the high sensitivity of qPCR demands appropriate normalization to correct for nonbiological variation. Presently, RNU6B (U6) is used for data normalization of circulating miRNAs in many studies. However, it was suggested that serum levels of U6 themselves might differ between individuals. Therefore, no consensus has been reached on the best normalization strategy in 'circulating miRNA'. We analyzed U6 levels as well as levels of spiked-in SV40-RNA in sera of 44 healthy volunteers, 203 intensive care unit patients and 64 patients with liver fibrosis. Levels of U6 demonstrated a high variability in sera of healthy donors, patients with critical illness and liver fibrosis. This high variability could also be confirmed in sera of mice after the cecal ligation and puncture procedure. Most importantly, levels of circulating U6 were significantly upregulated in sera of patients with critical illness and sepsis compared with controls and correlated with established markers of inflammation. In patients with liver fibrosis, U6 levels were significantly downregulated. In contrast, levels of spiked-in SV40 displayed a significantly higher stability both in human cohorts (healthy, critical illness, liver fibrosis) and in mice. Thus, we conclude that U6 levels in the serum are dysregulated in a disease-specific manner. Therefore, U6 should not be used for data normalization of circulating miRNAs in inflammatory diseases and previous studies using this approach should be interpreted with caution. Further studies are warranted to identify specific regulatory processes of U6 levels in sepsis and liver fibrosis.
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Animals
;
Antigens, Polyomavirus Transforming/blood
;
Case-Control Studies
;
Down-Regulation
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Liver Cirrhosis/*blood/diagnosis
;
Male
;
Mice
;
Mice, Inbred C57BL
;
Middle Aged
;
RNA, Small Nuclear/*blood
;
Reference Values
;
Sepsis/*blood/diagnosis
3.Whither systems medicine?
Rolf APWEILER ; Tim BEISSBARTH ; Michael R BERTHOLD ; Nils BLüTHGEN ; Yvonne BURMEISTER ; Olaf DAMMANN ; Andreas DEUTSCH ; Friedrich FEUERHAKE ; Andre FRANKE ; Jan HASENAUER ; Steve HOFFMANN ; Thomas HöFER ; Peter LM JANSEN ; Lars KADERALI ; Ursula KLINGMüLLER ; Ina KOCH ; Oliver KOHLBACHER ; Lars KUEPFER ; Frank LAMMERT ; Dieter MAIER ; Nico PFEIFER ; Nicole RADDE ; Markus REHM ; Ingo ROEDER ; Julio SAEZ-RODRIGUEZ ; Ulrich SAX ; Bernd SCHMECK ; Andreas SCHUPPERT ; Bernd SEILHEIMER ; Fabian J THEIS ; Julio VERA ; Olaf WOLKENHAUER
Experimental & Molecular Medicine 2018;50(3):e453-
New technologies to generate, store and retrieve medical and research data are inducing a rapid change in clinical and translational research and health care. Systems medicine is the interdisciplinary approach wherein physicians and clinical investigators team up with experts from biology, biostatistics, informatics, mathematics and computational modeling to develop methods to use new and stored data to the benefit of the patient. We here provide a critical assessment of the opportunities and challenges arising out of systems approaches in medicine and from this provide a definition of what systems medicine entails. Based on our analysis of current developments in medicine and healthcare and associated research needs, we emphasize the role of systems medicine as a multilevel and multidisciplinary methodological framework for informed data acquisition and interdisciplinary data analysis to extract previously inaccessible knowledge for the benefit of patients.