Background: There are currently no data on the prevalence and incidence of chronic pain in the Philippines. Objective: This study was undertaken to determine the incidence and prevalence of chronic pain in the general adult population of the Philippines. It also aimed to establish the demographic profile of chronic pain sufferers, identify the causes and intensity of chronic pain, and understand the impact of chronic pain on daily living and quality of life. This study also explored current treatment practices for patients with chronic pain, their levels of satisfaction with treatment, and barriers to obtaining appropriate treatment. Methodology: The study was conducted in the Philippines via a quantitative sample survey that involved face-to-face interviews using a two-phase structured questionnaire. Results: The survey showed an overall prevalence of moderate-to-severe chronic pain (chronic pain M+S) of 10.4% of the general adult population, with an annual incidence rate of 3.4%. Chronic pain M+S was more commonly reported by women and the elderly. The most common locations of pain were the knees, back and lower back. Daily routine was affected in about half of the sufferers, but they had rational attitudes to pain and positive views of medical treatment. High consultation fees discouraged nearly two-thirds of sufferers from seeking medical advice for their pain. Despite the availability of effective pain treatments, a large proportion of patients taking prescription painkillers reported that the medication was less than effective, indicating a large gap between achievable pain relief targets and patients’ expectations of pain medications. Conclusion: The Philippines has a relatively high prevalence of chronic pain M+S. There is a need for improved pain management to ensure that patients with chronic pain receive appropriate and effective treatment.

INTRODUCTION: GUARD (vildaGliptin clinical Use in reAl woRlD) was  a  multinational,  prospective,  observational  study that assessed the effectiveness,safety  and  tolerability of vildagliptin and vildagliptin+metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) under real-world conditions across four  geographical  regions  (Asia,  the  Middle  East,  Central  America and Africa). The current paper discusses the results of patients with T2DM enrolled in the Philippines.
METHODS: Patients  with  T2DM  who  were  prescribed vildagliptin or vildagliptin+metformin combination therapy were enrolled and followed as per routine clinical practice for 24 ± six weeks. Primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from  baseline  to  study  end  (week  24±6).  Key  secondary endpoints included proportion of patients reaching target HbA1c ?7.0%, incidence of hypoglycemic events, adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs).
RESULTS: A total of 1,117 patients were included in the final analysis, 280 on vildagliptin (of these, eight patients received additional oral antidiabetes medications) and 837 on vildagliptin+metformin. At baseline, the mean (±SD) age of the enrolled population was 54.1±11.5 years, BMI 26.3±4.7 kg/m2, HbA1c 8.0±1.2% and T2DM duration 2.3±4.0 years.At  study  end,  significant  mean  (±SE)  reductions  in  HbA1c of -1.2±0.1% (p<0.0001) and -1.5±0.1% (p<0.0001) from a baseline of 7.6±1.1% and 8.1±1.2% were observed for the vildagliptin and vildagliptin+metformin group, respectively.A similar proportion of patients achieved HbA1c ?7.0% in the vildagliptin (66.1%) and vildagliptin+metformin group(62.7%). Changes in body weight and BMI from baseline to week 24±6 were statistically significant (p<0.0001) in both the vildagliptin (-1.5±0.3 kg; -0.6±0.1 kg/m2) and the vildagliptin+metformin group (-1.4±0.2 kg; -0.5±0.1 kg/m2).The incidence of hypoglycemia was low--six patients reported hypoglycemia in the vildaglipti metformin group and  none  in  the  vildagliptin  group.  Incidence  of  adverse events was also low in both the groups (vildagliptin, 8.6% and vildagliptin+metformin, 5.3%).
CONCLUSION: Vildagliptin  and  vildagliptin+metformin significantly  reduced  HbA1c  with  good  weight  control and low incidence of hypoglycemia in patients with T2DM under real-world conditions in Philippines

Human ; Male ; Female ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Metformin ; Vildagliptin ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Adamantane ; Pyrrolidines ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; Nitriles ; Hypoglycemia ; Body Weight ; Asia ; Africa ; Central America

Coronary artery disease is highly prevalent in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is a risk factor for contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI), a complication of cardiovascular procedures that require contrast administration (e.g., coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]). CA-AKI has a major impact on morbidity, mortality, and healthcare resource utilization. The incidence of CA-AKI is particularly high in patients with pre-existing CKD, advanced age and comorbidities that increase the likelihood of CKD. The focus of the present review is to provide a brief overview on the assessment of the risk for and prevention of CA-AKI in patients undergoing angiography and PCI, including recognition of the important patient- and procedure-related factors that may contribute to CA-AKI. Preventive and treatment strategies, the mainstay of which is volume repletion by normal saline, are briefly discussed. The main focus of the review is placed on technical details of contrast minimization techniques, including ultra-low contrast angiography and zerocontrast PCI. Operator competence in such techniques is important to ensure that procedural challenges in patients with CKD, like vessel calcification, multivessel disease and complex anatomical subsets, are effectively addressed by PCI while minimizing the risk of CA-AKI.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop and validate a simple questionnaire for chronic neuropathic pain that can be administered as a screening tool by general practitioners and internists in order to help them identify patients with probable neuropathic pain.
METHODS: Following a development phase and a pilot study, the revised version of the screening tool which included eleven descriptors associated with neuropathic pain both in English and Filipino languages was validated on 120 consecutive patients with any type of pain except psychogenic pain, recruited in the out-patient clinics of six hospitals. The questionnaire was validated by assessing the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of each item and the overall questionnaire. The internal consistency of the questionnaire items was assessed using the Kuder-Richardson formula 20.
RESULTS: Overall, the internal consistency of the SigN-PQ using the Kuder-Richardson formula 20 was 0.7837; the sensitivity was 91.89% with specificity of 80.22%, PV (+) was 65.38% and PV(-) was 96.0%. For the English version, the descriptors with the highest scores were burning (Sensitivity: 100%, Specificity: 93%) and electricity-like (Sensitivity: 100%, Specificity: 93%). For the Filipino version, mainit (burning) has the highest sensitivity of 88% with specificity of 82.6%, followed by gumagapang (tingling) with sensitivity of 86.96% and specificity of 85.42%. The sensation of saksak (stabbing) and hiwa (lancinating) have the lowest sensitivity, 60% and 54% respectively, although their specificity scores are high. Since this study is a validation of a screening tool for neuropathic pain, the investigators decided to choose descriptors with higher sensitivity. Thus, in the final version of the SignN-PQ, the descriptors saksak and hiwa were removed.
CONCLUSION: The SigN-PQ Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire has a high overall sensitivity of 91.89% and specificity of 80.22%. The pain descriptors in the questionnaire are consistent with the descriptors cited in the literature. It is a valid screening instrument for neuropathic pain that can be easily incorporated in the daily practice of general practitioners and internists.

Human ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Young Adult ; Adolescent ; Neuralgia ; Pain ; Diagnosis ; General Practitioners ; Outpatients ; Research Personnel ; Sensitivity And Specificity ; Surveys And Questionnaires