1.Summary of the best evidence and practical suggestions on strategies for maintaining physical activity ability of the elderly in the community
Shulan YANG ; Biyan JIANG ; Xiaoqing JIN ; Wanqi YU ; Frances WONG ; Arkers WONG ; Xuejiao ZHU ; Caixia LIU
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing 2023;29(7):847-853
Objective:To focus on the physical activity strategy to maintain the activity ability of the elderly in the community, comprehensively retrieve and integrate the best evidence, form practical suggestions with the goal of the transformation and practice of evidence, so as to provide scientific, reliable and up-to-date basis for the implementation of relevant evidence.Methods:According to the 6S pyramid model, the British Medical Journal (BMJ) Best Practice, UpToDate, DynaMed, World Health Organization, Chinese Medical Association, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, New Zealand Guidelines Group, PubMed, SinoMed and other databases were retrieved layer by layer from top to bottom. This study obtained all articles of evidence-based knowledge base resources, clinical practice guidelines, expert consensus, systematic review and other types related to physical activity strategies to maintain the activity ability of the elderly in the community from January 1, 2017 to March 1, 2022. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the article, 2 to 4 researchers conducted independent methodological quality evaluation on different types of article according to the tool requirements, extracted and summarized the best evidence, and formed practical suggestions.Results:A total of 14 articles were included, including 2 evidence-based decision-making, 6 guidelines, 1 expert consensus, 3 systematic reviews, and 2 overviews of systematic review. Seven dimensions such as "overall advice, health benefits, diversified sports training, aerobic training, balance training, muscle strengthening/resistance training, flexibility training" and 22 best pieces of evidence were extracted and summarized, and practical suggestions were formed.Conclusions:Medical and nursing staff should adopt evidence-based methodological practical suggestions to provide management guidance and consultation for the maintenance of physical activity ability of the elderly in the community, so as to help the elderly to maintain physical activity ability and gain health benefits.
2.Flipping the advanced cardiac life support classroom with team-based learning: comparison of cognitive testing performance for medical students at the University of California, Irvine, United State.
Megan BOYSEN-OSBORN ; Craig L ANDERSON ; Roman NAVARRO ; Justin YANUCK ; Suzanne STROM ; Christopher E MCCOY ; Julie YOUM ; Mary Frances YPMA-WONG ; Mark I LANGDORF
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions 2016;13(1):11-
PURPOSE: It aimed to find if written test results improved for advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) taught in flipped classroom/team-based Learning (FC/TBL) vs. lecture-based (LB) control in University of California-Irvine School of Medicine, USA. METHODS: Medical students took 2010 ACLS with FC/TBL (2015), compared to 3 classes in LB (2012-14) format. There were 27.5 hours of instruction for FC/TBL model (TBL 10.5, podcasts 9, small-group simulation 8 hours), and 20 (12 lecture, simulation 8 hours) in LB. TBL covered 13 cardiac cases; LB had none. Seven simulation cases and didactic content were the same by lecture (2012-14) or podcast (2015) as was testing: 50 multiple-choice questions (MCQ), 20 rhythm matchings, and 7 fill-in clinical cases. RESULTS: 354 students took the course (259 [73.1%] in LB in 2012-14, and 95 [26.9%] in FC/TBL in 2015). Two of 3 tests (MCQ and fill-in) improved for FC/TBL. Overall, median scores increased from 93.5% (IQR 90.6, 95.4) to 95.1% (92.8, 96.7, P=0.0001). For the fill-in test: 94.1% for LB (89.6, 97.2) to 96.6% for FC/TBL (92.4, 99.20 P=0.0001). For MC: 88% for LB (84, 92) to 90% for FC/TBL (86, 94, P=0.0002). For the rhythm test: median 100% for both formats. More students failed 1 of 3 tests with LB vs. FC/TBL (24.7% vs. 14.7%), and 2 or 3 components (8.1% vs. 3.2%, P=0.006). Conversely, 82.1% passed all 3 with FC/TBL vs. 67.2% with LB (difference 14.9%, 95% CI 4.8-24.0%). CONCLUSION: A FC/TBL format for ACLS marginally improved written test results.
Advanced Cardiac Life Support*
;
California*
;
Choice Behavior
;
Humans
;
Learning*
;
Students, Medical*
;
United States