Esophagus/surgery* ; Foreign Bodies/surgery* ; Gastroscopes ; Humans ; Ultrasonography

Foreign Bodies ; surgery ; Humans ; Oropharynx ; Punctures ; methods ; Ultrasonography

OBJECTIVE: We described the technique of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous removal of the foreign bodies (FB) with hydro-dissection in the radiologic department and presented video files of several cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four patients referred to the radiology department for US evaluation and US-guided percutaneous removal of the FBs in the upper and lower extremities between November, 2006 and November, 2013 were included in this study. The procedures started with US evaluation for the exact location and shape of the FB. A 5 mm-sized skin incision was made at the site of the nearest point from the FB where no passing arteries or tendons were present. We adopted a hydrodissection technique to separate the FB from adjacent tissue using a 2% lidocaine solution. Injected anesthetics detached the FBs from surrounding tissue and thereby facilitated removal. After the tip of the mosquito forceps reached the FB, the wooden FBs were removed. RESULTS: The mean time required for the entire procedure was approximately 20 minutes. There were no significant complications during the US-guided removal or long-term complications after the procedure. All 4 FBs were successfully removed from the soft tissue under US guidance. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous removal of the FBs with hydro-dissection in the radiology department is a less invasive and safe method over surgical removal in the operating room. Additionally, the use of a guide wire and serial dilator may help minimize soft tissue injury and facilitate the introduction of forceps.
Aged ; Child ; Female ; Foreign Bodies/*surgery/ultrasonography ; Humans ; Lower Extremity/*surgery/ultrasonography ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Soft Tissue Injuries/*surgery/ultrasonography ; Surgical Instruments

We report two cases of common bile duct stone formed around a fish bone which migrated from the intestinal tract, along with their characteristic imaging findings. Two patients who had no history of previous operation were admitted because of cholangitis. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) was performed and the cholangiogram showed filling defects with an unusually elongated shape in the common bile duct. After improvement of the cholangitic symptoms, the stones were removed through the PTBD tract under fluoroscopic guidance. A nidus consisting of a 1.5 cm sized fish bone was found in each stone removed.
Aged ; Animals ; Bone and Bones/*radiography/*ultrasonography ; Cholangiography ; Cholangitis/etiology ; Choledocholithiasis/*etiology/surgery ; Female ; Fishes ; Foreign Bodies/*complications/surgery ; Humans ; Male

OBJECTIVETo evaluate transcervical removal of foreign bodies (TCRF) and to estimate the effectiveness of its monitoring methods.

METHODSOne hundred and thirteen women were identified as having residual intrauterine devices (IUD), residual pregnancy products, unabsorbed strings and broken hooks, which were not removed during routine curettage or IUD removal. All patients were monitored using B ultrasonography while TCRF was performed. Four cases were monitored by laparoscopy simultaneously. One case was monitored by laparoscopic ultrasonography.

RESULTSForeign bodies of one hundred and nine patients were taken out by TCRF. Uterine bleeding, amenorrhoea, discharge, abdominal pain, micturition and hematuria disappeared postoperatively. Fetal bones embedded into intramural uterin in four cases were not removed completely. Of these four, one became pregnant 4 months later after TCRF and term delivered. One case encountered uterine perforation that was sutured by laparoscopy.

CONCLUSIONSTCRF is safe and efficient. Sufficient cervical canal distension, selection of equipment and methods to be used is important for successful TCRF. As a non-invasive and effective monitoring method, B ultrasonography is the first choice to monitor for TCRF. For patients with high risk factors for uterine perforation, laparoscopic monitoring should be done simultaneously. Laparoscopic ultrasonography monitoring has both the advantages of B ultrasonography and laparoscopy monitoring, but is invasive and expensive.

Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Foreign Bodies ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Humans ; Hysteroscopy ; methods ; Intrauterine Devices ; Laparoscopy ; Middle Aged ; Pregnancy ; Ultrasonography

Missed or neglected foreign bodies are not infrequent in surgical practice. This case report highlights the fact that thorough clinical examination and detailed evaluation of trauma patients are very necessary so that any associated injuries or foreign bodies will not be missed and any unforeseen clinical or medico-legal complications can be prevented. We present a case of a 35-year- old male patient who had traumatic transfemoral amputation of the right lower limb with a clean laceration (size 2 cm multiply 1 cm) over the medial aspect of the left thigh. Radiographs suggested a single radioopaque foreign body which proved misleading, as during surgical removal multiple radiolucent and radiopaque foreign bodies were discovered. Postoperative ultrasound was performed and showed no retained foreign bodies. A secondary closure of the right thigh amputation was done and patient was discharged. At the last follow-up, 9 months after injury, the patient had no complaints, and both the amputation stump and the wound over the left thigh were healthy. Thus in the cases of retained foreign bodies, in addition to thorough clinical examination and radiography, ultrasonograpy should be supplemented. And if required, use of CT scan as well as MRI should be also considered.
Accidents, Traffic ; Adult ; Amputation ; Diagnostic Errors ; Foreign Bodies ; diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Leg Injuries ; complications ; Male ; Radiography ; Thigh ; surgery ; Ultrasonography

INTRODUCTIONThe aim of this study was to investigate the role of ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) in imaging anterior segment foreign bodies and compare it with conventional B-scan ultrasound and computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODSThe charts of 18 eyes with anterior segment foreign bodies were reviewed. The rates of detection of foreign bodies using ultrasound, CT scan and UBM were compared.

RESULTSThe foreign body detection rates were 36.5% by ultrasound, 88.9% by CT scan, and 94.4% by UBM. The diagnosis of presence of a foreign body using UBM was made based on high reflective echoes causing shadowing or reverberations. In 7 eyes, UBM detected injury to the zonules, guiding the operative procedure. In the 8 eyes for which all tests were performed, rates of detection of foreign bodies were 25% (2/8) with ultrasound, 87.5% (7/8) with CT, and 100% (8/8) with UBM.

CONCLUSIONUBM is a valuable adjunct for the accurate localisation of small foreign bodies, including cilia. It offers a higher detection rate than that provided by ultrasound and CT scan.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Anterior Eye Segment ; ultrastructure ; Diagnostic Errors ; prevention & control ; Eye Foreign Bodies ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Microscopy, Acoustic ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography ; methods ; Wounds, Penetrating ; complications