OBJECTIVE: To investigate the timing of reaching maximum improvement of the lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients with advanced prostate cancer treated with maximal androgen blockade(MAB), and to provide guidelines for the treatment program. METHODS: We collected the data of 45 advanced prostate cancer patients complicated with lower urinary tract symptoms who were treated by MAB. The international prostate symptom score (IPSS) and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) were selected as indicators reflecting the degree of lower urinary tract symptoms and were observed before the MAB, 3, 6, and 9 months after the patients received MAB. We also observed the changes of prostate volume and analyzed the role of MAB in improving LUTS in patients with prostate cancer. RESULTS: The IPSS and Qmax had significant difference between the 3rd month after the patients received MAB and before the MAB (P<0.05). No significant difference was found between the 3rd month and the 6th month after the patients received MAB (P>0.05). The prostate volume had significant difference in the 3rd month and the 6th month (P<0.05), but no significant difference in the 6th month and the 9th month (P>0.05). CONCLUSION MAB for patients with advanced prostate cancer can improve their lower urinary tract symptoms, whose main effect is presented in the 3rd months after the androgen deprivation therapy.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Androgen Antagonists ; therapeutic use ; Anilides ; therapeutic use ; Flutamide ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Nitriles ; therapeutic use ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; complications ; drug therapy ; Tosyl Compounds ; therapeutic use ; Urination Disorders ; drug therapy ; etiology

OBJECTIVETo understand long-term survival rate after combined androgen blockade (CAB) in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

METHODSA selected population of 59 patients with advanced prostate cancer were treated with CAB. 28.81% (17/59) of patients had clinical locally advanced disease (stage T3-4N0M0), and 45.76% (27/59) of patients had metastatic disease (stage TxNxM+). Overall, patients were followed for a median of 62 (range 6-136) months.

RESULTSOf the 59 patients with advanced prostate cancer, 3-year, 5-year and 7-year overall survival rates were 79.36%, 61.46% and 49.15%, respectively. The 5-year survival rate were 80.77% and 32.65% for clinical locally advanced disease and metastatic disease. Specifically, men with poorly differentiated prostate cancer had a 5-year survival of only 30% when compared with men with well-differentiated prostate disease who had a 5-year survival of 86.21%.

CONCLUSIONBased on these findings, men with poorly differentiated cancer, stage T3c-4NxMx or TxNxM+ and PSA level above 30 microg/L had a high probability of dying from their advanced prostate cancer.

Aged ; Androgen Antagonists ; therapeutic use ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Flutamide ; therapeutic use ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; mortality ; surgery ; Survival Rate

Even in the era of novel targeted agents, switching to a second-line nonsteroidal antiandrogen (NSAA) is still widely used in treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), especially in undeveloped countries. However, whether prior treatment with a second-line NSAA would impact the efficacy of abiraterone acetate (Abi) remains uncertain. In the current study, 87 mCRPC patients treated with Abi were analyzed. Among them, 21 were treated with a second-line NSAA (from bicalutamide to flutamide) before receiving abiraterone, while the remaining 66 received Abi directly. Therapeutic efficacy of Abi was compared between those with and without prior second-line NSAA using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and Cox regression models. The therapeutic efficacy of Abi was similar between those with or without the prior switching treatment of flutamide, in terms of either prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS, 5.5 vs 5.6 months, P = 0.967), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS, 12.8 vs 13.4 months, P = 0.508), overall survival (OS, not reached vs 30.6 months, P = 0.606), or PSA-response rate (71.4% [15/21] vs 60.6% [40/66], P = 0.370). This is the first time that the impact of prior switching of treatment to a second-line NSAA on the efficacy of Abi in mCRPC patients has been addressed. Our data support that, use of prior sequential bicalutamide and flutamide does not seem to preclude response to abiraterone, although larger cohort studies and, ideally, a randomized controlled trial are needed. These findings will facilitate doctors' decision-making in the treatment of mCRPC patients, especially for those with previous experience of switching NSAA second-line treatments in the clinic.
Abiraterone Acetate/therapeutic use* ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use* ; Anilides/therapeutic use* ; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use* ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Flutamide/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Nitriles/therapeutic use* ; Nonsteroidal Anti-Androgens/therapeutic use* ; Prostate-Specific Antigen/analysis* ; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy* ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Analysis ; Tosyl Compounds/therapeutic use* ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the clinical efficacy of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) combined with endocrine therapy in the treatment of patients with prostate cancer.

METHODSTwenty patients with prostate cancer were treated with extracorporeal HIFU device( model FEP-BY01 ) and androgen ablation, of whom 15 received orchiectomy and 5 LHRH-a. Fourteen patients of the total number were given flutamide in addition to castration.

RESULTSThe mean follow-up was 13.5 months (ranging 6 to approximately 30). Before and after the treatment, the prostate volume, prostate specific antigen (PSA), international prostate symptom score (IPSS) and maximal flow rate (Qmax) of the patients were (36.4 +/- 16.2) ml and (20.6 +/- 11.8) ml (P < 0.05), (32.2 +/- 10.4) ng/ml and (2.4 +/- 0.8) ng/ml (P < 0.01), 20. 5 +/- 6.5 and 13.6 +/- 7.5 (P < 0.05), (10.6 +/- 6.3) ml/s and (14.2 +/- 4.6) ml/s (P < 0.05), respectively. Mild hematuria and pain were noted in 5 and 8 patients respectively, and 1 patient underwent internal urethrotomy with a cold knife because of urethral stricture. er, with minimal complications.

CONCLUSIONHIFU combined with endocrine therapy is effective in the treatment of prostate canc-

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal ; therapeutic use ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Flutamide ; therapeutic use ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone ; antagonists & inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orchiectomy ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; therapy ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasound, High-Intensity Focused, Transrectal

AIMTo evaluate the long-term effectiveness, side effects and compliance rates of two types of drugs (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone [LHRH] agonist and antiandrogen) that were used individually to treat patients with localized prostate cancer (T1-2) at our institution.

METHODSNinety-seven patients who were diagnosed in the period from April 1997 to January 2000 as having clinically localized prostate cancer (T1-2) received either LHRH agonist (leuprolide acetate 7.5 mg/month) monotherapy (group 1, n = 62) or antiandrogen monotherapy (group 2, n = 35; 18 received bicalutamide 50 mg q.d., 13 received nilutamide 150 mg t.i.d. and 4 received flutamide 250 mg t.i.d.). The mean age in both groups was 76 years.

RESULTSThe mean follow-up time was (50.8 +/- 8.5) months in group 1 and (43.1 +/- 2.2) months in group 2. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels rose in only 1 of the 62 patients (1.6%) in group 1, and in 20 of the 35 patients (57.1%) in group 2. In group 2, 10 of the 20 patients (50%) with increasing PSA levels were treated with LHRH salvage therapy, and eight (80%) responded. Hot flashes (54.8%) and lethargy (41.9%) were the most common side effects in group 1. In contrast, nipple-tenderness (40%) and light-dark adaptation (17.1%) were more often seen in group 2. Only 1 of the 62 patients (1.6%) in group 1 switched to another medication because of adverse side effects; whereas 8 of the 35 patients (22.9%) in group 2 did so.

CONCLUSIONUnlike antiandrogen monotherapy, LHRH agonist monotherapy provided long-term durable control of localized prostate cancer (T1-2). It can also be an effective treatment option for patients whose disease failed to respond to antiandrogen monotherapy. The limitations of our study are the lack of health outcomes analysis and a small sample size.

Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Androgen Antagonists ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Anilides ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Flutamide ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone ; agonists ; Humans ; Imidazolidines ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Leuprolide ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Nitriles ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Prostate-Specific Antigen ; blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Tosyl Compounds ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

AIMTo study the effect of combined androgen block therapy on hemoglobin and hematocrit values in patients with prostate cancer.

METHODSOne hundred and thirty-six patients with adenocarcinoma of prostate were treated with combined androgen block (orchiectomy and flutamide 250 mg, tid). Complete blood counts were determined before and after 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of therapy.

RESULTSThe hemoglobin and hematocrit levels declined significantly in all patients and at all the time points after treatment (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONProstate cancer patients treated with combined androgen block would develop obvious anemia. Recombinant human erythropoietin can be used to treat patients with severe anemia.

Adenocarcinoma ; complications ; drug therapy ; therapy ; Adult ; Androgen Antagonists ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Anemia ; chemically induced ; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal ; therapeutic use ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Flutamide ; therapeutic use ; Hematocrit ; Hemoglobins ; metabolism ; Humans ; Male ; Orchiectomy ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; complications ; drug therapy ; therapy ; Prostatic Secretory Proteins ; analysis

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic effect of radical prostatectomy combined with preoperative neoadjuvant hormonal ablation therapy for prostate cancer (PCa). In this study, a total of 31 patients with local PCa underwent radical prostatectomy; of these, 12 patients underwent preoperative hormonal deprivation with a combination of goserelin and flutamide for a period of 5.6 months. Data regarding clinical characteristics were compared between the neoadjuvant therapy and radical prostatectomy groups. A total of 31 patients received pelvic lymph node clearance, and the rate of positive lymph nodes was 12.9% (4/31). Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 8.9 +/- 1.2 microg L(-1) after the neoadjuvant therapy and 0.4 +/- 0.3 microg L(-1) one month after the radical prostatectomy. There were significant differences in the positive surgical margins, seminal vesicle invasion and lymph node metastasis between the neoadjuvant therapy group (n = 12) and the radical prostatectomy group (n = 19, P < 0.01). The resulsts indicates that preoperative hormonal deprivation induced by goserelin and flutamide can decrease clinical and pathological staging, but assessment of its influence on long-term prognosis requires further study.
Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal ; therapeutic use ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Flutamide ; therapeutic use ; Goserelin ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; methods ; Prostate-Specific Antigen ; blood ; Prostatectomy ; methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; blood ; drug therapy ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome