1.Efficacy of non-penetrating trabecular surgery for open angle glaucoma: a meta-analysis.
Jin-wei CHENG ; Xiao-ye MA ; Rui-li WEI
Chinese Medical Journal 2004;117(7):1006-1010
BACKGROUNDNon-penetrating trabecular surgery is a new filtrating surgery without opening in ternal trabecular structures. This study was to estimate the overall efficacy of non-penetrating trabecular surgery for open angle glaucoma.
METHODSThe published articles selected for this study were obtained by a computerised Medline and China Biological Medicine Disk search of the literature and a manual search of the bibliographies of relevant articles. Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were reviewed systematically, and the reported data were aggregated using the statistical techniques of meta-analysis.
RESULTSA total of 37 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled complete success rates of non-penetrating trabecular surgery with different techniques were: deep sclerectomy single, 69.7% (95% CI: 58.5% - 81.0%); deep sclerectomy with collagen implant, 59.4% (95% CI: 47.0% - 71.8%); deep sclerectomy with reticulated hyaluronic acid implant, 71.1% (95% CI: 56.8% - 85.3%); and viscocanalostomy, 72.0% (95% CI: 57.6% - 86.4%). The overall weighted complete success rate of non-penetrating trabecular surgery was 67.8% (95% CI: 61.4% - 74.3%).
CONCLUSIONSNon-penetrating trabecular surgery is the best available therapy method for medically uncontrolled open angle glaucoma with a complete success rate of over 60%. But the different techniques cannot belie the complete success rate of non-penetrating trabecular surgery.
Filtering Surgery ; methods ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle ; surgery ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure ; Sclerostomy ; Trabeculectomy
2.A retrospective and consecutive study of viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy for primary congenital glaucoma.
Qin CHEN ; Yan YU ; Hong SUN ; Yuan ZONG ; Zhi-lan YUAN
Chinese Medical Journal 2013;126(8):1418-1424
BACKGROUNDSurgical interventions are the main treatment for primary congenital glaucoma (PCG). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between viscocanalostomy and mitomycin C (MMC)-trabeculectomy in patients with PCG.
METHODSA total number of 43 patients with PCG who underwent either viscocanalostomy (group 1) or MMC- trabeculectomy (group 2) between June 2003 and June 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients' intraocular pressures (IOPs) were examined before surgery and on day 1, week 1, month 1, month 6, and month 12 post-operative. Mean horizontal corneal diameters, success rates, intra- and post-operative complications were compared between the two groups.
RESULTSPre-operative IOPs were (31.96 ± 3.90) mmHg in group 1 and (32.56 ± 4.00) mmHg in group 2. At the last visit, IOPs were (16.78 ± 2.20) mmHg and (15.77 ± 2.60) mmHg, respectively (P < 0.001); the complete success rates of group 1 and group 2 were 45.9% and 67.4%, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.158). There were no major complications occurred in the two groups.
CONCLUSIONSBoth viscocanalostomy and trabeculectomy can lower IOP in PCG patients effectively. Although there was no major complications occurred in both groups, viscocanlostomy may decrease the probability of postoperative haemorrhage, hypotony, cataract, or choroid effusion.
Female ; Filtering Surgery ; adverse effects ; methods ; Glaucoma ; congenital ; surgery ; Humans ; Infant ; Intraocular Pressure ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Trabeculectomy ; adverse effects ; methods
3.Combined surgery for cataract and glaucoma: phacoemulsification, foldable intraocular lens implantation and viscocanalostomy.
Ke YAO ; Xing-chao SHEN-TU ; Wen XU ; Pei-qing CHEN
Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences 2004;33(1):73-76
OBJECTIVETo assess the outcome of phacoemulsification-intraocular lens (IOL) implantation combined with viscocanalostomy (P-C group), compared with that of phacoemulsification-IOL implantation combined with trabeculectomy (P-T group).
METHODSCombined phacoemulsification with corneal incision, foldable intraocular lens implantation and viscocanalostomy was performed in 21 eyes of 19 cataract patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. All patients were followed up for 3 - 6 months.
RESULTIntraocular pressure (IOP) was significantly lower in both P-C group and P-T group (P=0.000). There was no statistically significant difference between two groups. Visual outcome was similar in both groups. Complications of P-C group included Descemet's membrane puncture in 2 eyes, Schlemm's tube puncture in 2 eyes and IOP spikes in 3 eyes (at 24 hours postoperatively). The P-C group experienced significantly less inflammation than the P-T group.
CONCLUSIONPhacoemulsification-IOL implantation combined with viscocanalostomy is a safe and effective surgery, with lower complicatin rate and easier ambulatory care.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Filtering Surgery ; methods ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle ; surgery ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Phacoemulsification ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; Visual Acuity
4.Prognostic Factors for the Success of Laser Iridotomy for Acute Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma.
Jong Wook LEE ; Jung Ho LEE ; Kyoo Won LEE
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2009;23(4):286-290
PURPOSE: To identify the prognostic factors for successful laser iridotomy for acute angle-closure glaucoma (AACG). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 77 eyes of 77 patients with AACG with initial intraocular pressure (IOP) above 40 mmHg. All of the patients received maximum tolerable medical therapy (MTMT) followed by laser iridotomy. In order to comparatively analyze the factors affecting successful laser iridotomy, an increase in IOP on follow-up was defined as increase in IOP greater than 21 mmHg requiring medical or surgical treatment. RESULTS: Successful laser iridotomy was achieved in 59.7% (46/77 eyes). Thirty-one eyes (40.3%) exhibited increased IOP on follow-up, and of these, 30 eyes developed an increase in IOP within six months after the first attack. The success rate was higher (92.9%) in 42 patients who had greater than 30% IOP reduction by MTMT at the first attack compared to the 35 patients whose IOP reduction was less than 30%, of which 24 eyes (72.7%) showed more than 30% IOP reduction after intravenous hyperosmotic agent treatment (p=0.012). The success rate was higher in patients treated within seven days after the development of symptoms than in those treated after seven days (Odds ratio, 4.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.38 to 14.75). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that we can expect successful IOP control after laser iridotomy in eyes with AACG if the patient can be treated within seven days after the development of symptoms and if the IOP reduction was more than 30% by MTMT.
Acute Disease
;
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Female
;
Filtering Surgery/*methods
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Glaucoma, Angle-Closure/physiopathology/*surgery
;
Humans
;
Intraocular Pressure/physiology
;
Iris/*surgery
;
Laser Therapy/*methods
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Prognosis
;
Retrospective Studies
5.Surgical Outcomes of Different Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation Methods between Scleral Graft and Scleral Flap.
Ho Young LEE ; Jong Seok PARK ; Yoon Jung CHOY ; Hyun Joo LEE
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2011;25(5):317-322
PURPOSE: To compare the surgical outcomes of the two different methods used for Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) implantation between the donor scleral graft method and the partial-thickness scleral flap method. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 28 eyes of 26 patients diagnosed as neovascular glaucoma followed by AGV implantation. Based on the surgical method, the included eyes were divided into two groups. In the graft group (n = 18), the drainage tube was inserted into the anterior chamber, and then covered with preserved donor sclera. In the flap group (n = 10), the drainage tube was inserted under the partial-thickness scleral flap, and then covered with the flap. We compared the postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), surgical success rates, and postoperative complications between the two groups. RESULTS: Postoperative IOP was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.967, 0.495 at 12 months, 24 months, respectively, by the Mann-Whitney U-test). The mean success periods were 53.1 +/- 10.1 months in the graft group versus 50.9 +/- 9.4 months in the flap group (p = 0.882 by log rank test), and cumulative success rates were 77.8% and 80.0% at one year, respectively. However, tube migration occurred more frequently in the flap group than in the graft group (p = 0.037 by Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSIONS: In AGV surgery for neovascular glaucoma, the scleral graft method may be associated with relatively less complication about tube migration than the scleral flap method. The surgical results, however, were not statistically different.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Filtering Surgery/*methods
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
*Glaucoma Drainage Implants
;
Glaucoma, Neovascular/physiopathology/*surgery
;
Humans
;
Intraocular Pressure
;
Middle Aged
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Sclera/*transplantation
;
*Surgical Flaps
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Young Adult
6.Surgical Outcomes of Different Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation Methods between Scleral Graft and Scleral Flap.
Ho Young LEE ; Jong Seok PARK ; Yoon Jung CHOY ; Hyun Joo LEE
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2011;25(5):317-322
PURPOSE: To compare the surgical outcomes of the two different methods used for Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) implantation between the donor scleral graft method and the partial-thickness scleral flap method. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 28 eyes of 26 patients diagnosed as neovascular glaucoma followed by AGV implantation. Based on the surgical method, the included eyes were divided into two groups. In the graft group (n = 18), the drainage tube was inserted into the anterior chamber, and then covered with preserved donor sclera. In the flap group (n = 10), the drainage tube was inserted under the partial-thickness scleral flap, and then covered with the flap. We compared the postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), surgical success rates, and postoperative complications between the two groups. RESULTS: Postoperative IOP was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.967, 0.495 at 12 months, 24 months, respectively, by the Mann-Whitney U-test). The mean success periods were 53.1 +/- 10.1 months in the graft group versus 50.9 +/- 9.4 months in the flap group (p = 0.882 by log rank test), and cumulative success rates were 77.8% and 80.0% at one year, respectively. However, tube migration occurred more frequently in the flap group than in the graft group (p = 0.037 by Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSIONS: In AGV surgery for neovascular glaucoma, the scleral graft method may be associated with relatively less complication about tube migration than the scleral flap method. The surgical results, however, were not statistically different.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Filtering Surgery/*methods
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
*Glaucoma Drainage Implants
;
Glaucoma, Neovascular/physiopathology/*surgery
;
Humans
;
Intraocular Pressure
;
Middle Aged
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Sclera/*transplantation
;
*Surgical Flaps
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Young Adult