1.Reference values for pulp oxygen saturation as a diagnostic tool in endodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Paula LAMBERT ; Sergio Augusto Quevedo MIGUENS JR ; Caroline SOLDA ; Juliana Tomaz SGANZERLA ; Leandro Azambuja REICHERT ; Carlos ESTRELA ; Fernando Branco BARLETTA
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2020;45(4):e48-
Objectives:
This systematic review aimed to identify mean oxygen saturation values (SpO2 ) using pulse oximetry in permanent maxillary anterior teeth.
Materials and Methods:
The MEDLINE, Scientific Electronic Library Online, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and Literatura Latino Americana em Ciências da Saúde electronic databases were searched. Combinations and variations of “oximetry” AND “dental pulp test” were used as search terms. Studies reporting means and standard deviations of SpO2 values were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, and all analyses were performed using R software. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
Results:
Of the 251 studies identified, 19 met the eligibility criteria and were included (total sample, 4,541 teeth). In the meta-analysis, the mean SpO2 values were 84.94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.85%–85.04%) for the central incisors, 89.29% (95% CI, 89.22%– 89.35%) for the lateral incisors, and 89.20% (95% CI, 89.05%–89.34%) for the canines. The studies were predominantly low-quality due to the high risk of bias associated with the index test, unclear risk regarding patient selection, and concerns about outcome assessment.
Conclusions
Although most studies were low-quality, the oxygen saturation levels in normal pulp could be established (minimum saturation, 77.52%). Despite the risk of bias of the included studies, the reference values reported herein are clinically relevant for assessments of changes in pulp status.
2.Cytocompatibility and cell proliferation evaluation of calcium phosphate-based root canal sealers
Letícia Boldrin MESTIERI ; Ivana Maria ZACCARA ; Lucas Siqueira PINHEIRO ; Fernando Branco BARLETTA ; Patrícia Maria Polli KOPPER ; Fabiana Soares GRECCA
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2020;45(1):2-
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the cell viability and migration of Endosequence Bioceramic Root Canal Sealer (BC Sealer) compared to MTA Fillapex and AH Plus.MATERIALS AND METHODS: BC Sealer, MTA Fillapex, and AH Plus were placed in contact with culture medium to obtain sealers extracts in dilution 1:1, 1:2 and 1:4. 3T3 cells were plated and exposed to the extracts. Cell viability and migration were assessed by 3-(4,5-dimethyl-thiazoyl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) and Scratch assay, respectively. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's test (p < 0.05).RESULTS: The MTT assay revealed greater cytotoxicity for AH Plus and MTA Fillapex at 1:1 dilution when compared to control (p < 0.05). At 1:2 and 1:4 dilutions, all sealers were similar to control (p > 0.05) and MTA Fillapex was more cytotoxic than BC Sealer (p < 0.05). Scratch assay demonstrated the continuous closure of the wound according to time. At 30 hours, the control group presented closure of the wound (p < 0.05). At 36 hours, only BC Sealer presented the closure when compared to AH Plus and MTA Fillapex (p < 0.05). At 42 hours, AH Plus and MTA Fillapex showed a wound healing (p > 0.05).CONCLUSIONS: All tested sealers demonstrated cell viability highlighting BC Sealer, which showed increased cell migration capacity suggesting that this sealer may achieve better tissue repair when compared to other tested sealers.
3T3 Cells
;
Animals
;
Calcium
;
Cell Movement
;
Cell Proliferation
;
Cell Survival
;
Dental Pulp Cavity
;
Endodontics
;
Fibroblasts
;
Mice
;
Pemetrexed
;
Wound Healing
;
Wounds and Injuries
3.Cytocompatibility and cell proliferation evaluation of calcium phosphate-based root canal sealers
LetÃcia Boldrin MESTIERI ; Ivana Maria ZACCARA ; Lucas Siqueira PINHEIRO ; Fernando Branco BARLETTA ; PatrÃcia Maria Polli KOPPER ; Fabiana Soares GRECCA
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2020;45(1):e2-
OBJECTIVES:
This study aimed to evaluate the cell viability and migration of Endosequence Bioceramic Root Canal Sealer (BC Sealer) compared to MTA Fillapex and AH Plus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
BC Sealer, MTA Fillapex, and AH Plus were placed in contact with culture medium to obtain sealers extracts in dilution 1:1, 1:2 and 1:4. 3T3 cells were plated and exposed to the extracts. Cell viability and migration were assessed by 3-(4,5-dimethyl-thiazoyl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) and Scratch assay, respectively. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's test (p < 0.05).
RESULTS:
The MTT assay revealed greater cytotoxicity for AH Plus and MTA Fillapex at 1:1 dilution when compared to control (p < 0.05). At 1:2 and 1:4 dilutions, all sealers were similar to control (p > 0.05) and MTA Fillapex was more cytotoxic than BC Sealer (p < 0.05). Scratch assay demonstrated the continuous closure of the wound according to time. At 30 hours, the control group presented closure of the wound (p < 0.05). At 36 hours, only BC Sealer presented the closure when compared to AH Plus and MTA Fillapex (p < 0.05). At 42 hours, AH Plus and MTA Fillapex showed a wound healing (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
All tested sealers demonstrated cell viability highlighting BC Sealer, which showed increased cell migration capacity suggesting that this sealer may achieve better tissue repair when compared to other tested sealers.
4.Reference values for pulp oxygen saturation as a diagnostic tool in endodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Paula LAMBERT ; Sergio Augusto Quevedo MIGUENS JR ; Caroline SOLDA ; Juliana Tomaz SGANZERLA ; Leandro Azambuja REICHERT ; Carlos ESTRELA ; Fernando Branco BARLETTA
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2020;45(4):e48-
Objectives:
This systematic review aimed to identify mean oxygen saturation values (SpO2 ) using pulse oximetry in permanent maxillary anterior teeth.
Materials and Methods:
The MEDLINE, Scientific Electronic Library Online, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and Literatura Latino Americana em Ciências da Saúde electronic databases were searched. Combinations and variations of “oximetry” AND “dental pulp test” were used as search terms. Studies reporting means and standard deviations of SpO2 values were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, and all analyses were performed using R software. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
Results:
Of the 251 studies identified, 19 met the eligibility criteria and were included (total sample, 4,541 teeth). In the meta-analysis, the mean SpO2 values were 84.94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.85%–85.04%) for the central incisors, 89.29% (95% CI, 89.22%– 89.35%) for the lateral incisors, and 89.20% (95% CI, 89.05%–89.34%) for the canines. The studies were predominantly low-quality due to the high risk of bias associated with the index test, unclear risk regarding patient selection, and concerns about outcome assessment.
Conclusions
Although most studies were low-quality, the oxygen saturation levels in normal pulp could be established (minimum saturation, 77.52%). Despite the risk of bias of the included studies, the reference values reported herein are clinically relevant for assessments of changes in pulp status.