Hespintor is an unknown function protein that was got from hepatoblastoma cell lines HepG2 by suppression subtractive hybridization technique (SSH), sequence analysis showed that the protein is a new member of secretory type of Kazal type serine protease inhibitor (Serpin) family, and has high homology with esophageal cancer related gene 2 (ECRG2). The coding sequence of Hespintor's Kazal domain was subcloned into prokaryotic expression vector pET-40b(+), then transformed into Rosetta (DE3). A recombinant protein about 42 kDa in the form of inclusion body was optimization expressed by inducing with 0.25 mmol/L IPTG, 30 degrees C for 5 h. and its specificity was confirmed via Western blotting. The recombinant protein was purified by metal chelate affinity chromatography (MCAC) and anion-exchange chromatography. The preliminary experimental result showed that the recombinant protein can inhibit trysin hydrolysis activity specifically. The result clearly demonstrated that Hespintor, as a novel member of Serpin, would be valuable in developing anti-tumor agents.
Escherichia coli ; genetics ; metabolism ; Genetic Vectors ; genetics ; Hep G2 Cells ; Humans ; Proteinase Inhibitory Proteins, Secretory ; Recombinant Proteins ; biosynthesis ; genetics ; Serine Peptidase Inhibitors, Kazal Type ; Serine Proteinase Inhibitors ; biosynthesis ; classification ; genetics

OBJECTIVETo establish a new method on stratification analysis when the stratification limits of confounding factors was not clear or contradictory.

METHODData on a study of diabetes mellitus in Guangdong province collected in the year of 1997 and 1998 was analyzed using cluster-stratification analysis.

RESULTSThe efficiency of stratification analysis was improved and the confounding bias was effectively controlled with information bias avoided when the clusters-stratification analysis was applied.

CONCLUSIONThe problem was logically solved using cluster analysis as an assistant stratification means.

Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Bias ; China ; epidemiology ; Cluster Analysis ; Confounding Factors (Epidemiology) ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Diabetes Mellitus ; epidemiology ; Epidemiologic Methods ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Factors

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to explore the relationship between surgical methods, hemorrhage position, hemorrhage volume, surgical timing and treatment outcome of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH). METHODS: A total of 1310 patients, who had been admitted to six hospitals from January 2004 to January 2008, were divided into six groups according to different surgical methods: craniotomy through bone flap (group A), craniotomy through a small bone window (group B), stereotactic drilling drainage (group C1 and group C2), neuron-endoscopy operation (group D) and external ventricular drainage (group E) in consideration of hemorrhage position, hemorrhage volume and clinical practice. A retrospective analysis was made of surgical timing and curative effect of the surgical methods. RESULTS: The effectiveness rate of the methods was 74.12％ for 1310 patients after one-month follow-up. In this series, the disability rate was 44.82％ 3–6 months after the operation. Among the 1310 patients, 241 (18.40％) patients died after the operation. If hematoma volume was >80 mL and the operation was performed within 3 hours, the mortality rate of group A was significantly lower than that of groups B, C, D, and E (P<0.05). If hematoma volume was 50–80 mL and the operation was performed within 6–12 hours, the mortality rate of groups B and D was lower than that of groups A, C and E (P<0.05). If hematoma volume was 20–50 mL and the operation was performed within 6–24 hours, the mortality rate of group C was lower than that of groups A, B and D (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Craniotomy through a bone flap is suitable for patients with a large hematoma and hernia of the brain. Stereotactic drilling drainage is suggested for patients with hematoma volume less than 80 mL. The curative effect of HICH individualized treatment would be improved via the suitable selection of operation time and surgical method according to the position and volume of hemorrhage.

BACKGROUNDWith the rapid development of computer technology, digital medicine has become a new direction in surgery. The application of digital medicine in hepatic surgery is still at the early stage and less reported in the literature. The aim of this study was to apply digital medical technology in the context of hepatic surgery.

METHODSData from 64-slice helical computed tomography of 17 patients, including 13 with hepatocellular carcinoma and 4 with hepatic hemangioma, were imported into independently developed medical image software program, segmentation and three-dimensional reconstruction were performed. The three-dimensional models were then processed with the FreeForm Modeling System. We used virtual surgical instruments to perform surgery on the models. Simulated surgeries included six hepatic segmentectomies, four left hemihepatectomies, three right hemihepatectomies for hepatocellular carcinoma, one hepatic segmentectomy, two stripping surgeries, and one irregular segmentectomy combined with stripping surgery for hemangioma. For resections involving more than three hepatic segments, total and residual functional hepatic volumes were measured before and after simulation surgery, and the resection ratio was calculated.

RESULTSThe anatomy of the models was distinct and was used to localize lesions. We used virtual surgical instruments to perform simulated surgeries and used the models to optimize actual surgeries. We were able to minimize resection volume as well as surgical risk.

CONCLUSIONSDigital medical technology is helpful in the diagnosis of hepatic disease and in optimizing surgical plans. Three-dimensional models can decrease surgical risk and help prevent postoperative hepatic failure.

Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Liver ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; methods

OBJECTIVETo analyze the effect of different hepatic vascular exclusions for massive hemorrhage in hepatectomy.

METHODSThe clinical data of 2238 cases with hepatectomy treated from January 1995 to August 2009 was analyzed retrospectively in the cause of massive hemorrhage (blood loss ≥ 1000 ml), blood loss during liver resection and massive hemorrhage incidence with different methods of hepatic vascular exclusion.

RESULTSAmong 2238 cases received hepatectomy, 215 cases (9.6%) had massive hemorrhage because of portal vein tumor thrombus extraction (26.0%), extensive adhesions around the tumor (24.7%), section of liver hemorrhage (23.7%), hepatic vascular injury (15.8%), and tumor rupture (9.8%). Among 2182 cases received hepatectomy without portal vein tumor thrombus extraction, 159 cases (7.3%) had massive hemorrhage, 1257 cases (57.6%) which blood loss were less than 400 ml. Hepatectomy with different hepatic vascular exclusion methods had different blood loss and massive hemorrhage incidence.

CONCLUSIONPringle combined with clamping infrahepatic vena cava method and the liver double-hanging maneuver through the retrohepatic avascular tunnel on the right of the inferior vena cava method can reduce blood loss and massive hemorrhage incidence in hepatectomy more effectively, especially for huge liver tumor resection.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; prevention & control ; Female ; Hepatectomy ; methods ; Humans ; Liver ; blood supply ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo investigate the risk factors affecting the mortality of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP).

METHODSThe clinical data of 141 patients with SAP treated from January 2001 to October 2005 were analyzed retrospectively. All the patients were divided into 2 groups, the death group and the survival group. Fifteen potential factors influencing the prognosis of SAP were analyzed with Logistic regression analysis.

RESULTSThirty-four cases (24.1%) among the 141 patients died. There were significant differences between the two groups in age, body mass index, length of stay, APACHE II score, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) (P < 0.05). Multiple-factor Logistic regression analysis indicated that the MODS (OR = 67. 358, P < 0.01), APACHE II score (OR =9.716, P < 0.01) and ACS (OR = 5.775, P < 0.05) were the independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of SAP during its early stage, whereas pancreatic infection (OR = 9.652, P < 0.01), MODS (OR = 5.212, P < 0.05) and celiac hemorrhage (OR = 4.707, P < 0.05) were the independent risk factors during the advanced stage of SAP.

CONCLUSIONSMODS,especially respiratory dysfunction and renal dysfunction,is the main cause of early mortality for SAP, whereas infection, multiple organ dysfunction and celiac hemorrhage may impact the later mortality. Therefore early prevention and correct management on the risk factors play critical roles in reducing the mortality of SAP.

APACHE ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Body Mass Index ; Female ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Organ Failure ; complications ; Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing ; complications ; mortality ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Survival Analysis ; Survival Rate

BACKGROUND: The tumor necrosis factor recepter associated factor (TRAF) 6 is an important intracellular adapter protein that plays a pivotal role in activating multiple inflammatory and immune related processes induced by cytokines. TRAF6 represents a strong candidate susceptibility factor for sepsis. We investigated whether polymorphisms at the TRAF6 gene are associated with the susceptibility to and severity of sepsis. METHODS: A hospital-based case-control study was conducted with 255 patients with sepsis and 260 controls who were recruited from Zhengzhou, China. Haplotype tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (htSNPs) were selected from the HapMap database and genotyped using the SNPstream genotyping platform. The associations with the susceptibility and disease severity of sepsis were estimated by logistic regression, and adjusted for age, sex, smoking, drinking, chronic diseases status, APACHEII score and critical illness status. RESULTS: A total of 13 TRAF6 SNPs were tagged by 7 htSNPs. Five htSNPs (rs5030490, rs5030411, rs5030416, rs5030445 and rs3740961) were genotyped in the case control study. Genotype frequencies of the htSNPs were conformed to the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in both patients and controls. No significant association was found between the 5 htSNPs and the susceptibility to and severity of sepsis. Compared with the main haplotype -11120A/-10688T/-9423A/805G/12967G, no certain haplotype was associated with the significantly susceptibility to or severity of sepsis. CONCLUSION: TRAF6 gene polymorphisms might not play a major role in mediating the susceptibility to and severity of sepsis in the Chinese population. A larger population-based case-control study is warranted.

Objective:To investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of Donafenib as postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients with high risk of recurrence after radical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Methods:The propensity score matching (PSM) and retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 157 HCC patients with high risk of recurrence after radical resection who were admitted to 6 medical centers, including The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University et al, from June 2021 to February 2023 were collected. There were 128 males and 29 females, aged (59±10)years. Of 157 patients, 101 cases undergoing Donafenib as postoperative adjuvant therapy were divided into the the Donafenib group, and 56 cases under-going no systemic postoperative adjuvant therapy were divided into the control group. Observation indicators: (1) PSM and comparison of general data of patients between the two groups after matching; (2) postoperative treatment; (3) follow-up and survival of patients; (4) analysis of risk factors affecting recurrence-free survival of patients. PSM was done based on the principle of optimal perfect matching, with the clamp value of 0.5, and the Donafenib group and the control group were matched at a ratio of 1.25∶1. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and comparison between groups was conducted using the t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range). Count data were described as absolute numbers and/or percentages, and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi-square test. Comparison of ordinal data between groups was conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis H test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates and draw survival curves, and the Log-Rank test was used for survival analysis. The COX proportional hazard model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses. Results:(1) PSM and comparison of general data of patients between the two groups after matching. Of 157 patients, 126 cases were successfully matched, including 70 cases in the Donafenib group and 56 cases in the control group, respectively. The elimination of tumor number confounding bias ensured comparability between the two groups after PSM. (2) Postoperative treatment. After PSM, of 70 patients in the Donafenib group, there were 23 cases receiving Donafenib monotherapy, 26 cases combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), 14 cases combined with immunotherapy, and 7 cases combined with TACE+immunotherapy. Of 56 patients in the control group, there were 37 cases receiving postoperative follow-up alone and 19 cases combined with TACE. (3) Follow-up and survival of patients. All 157 patients were followed up, and the follow-up time of the 101 patients in Donafenib group and the 56 patients in control group were 10.1(range, 6.3-14.6)months and 22.2(range, 15.1-25.5)months, respectively. During the follow-up period, 70 patients in the Donafenib group experienced treatment-related adverse reactions, inclu-ding 8 cases of grade 3 adverse reactions, 23 cases of grade 2 and 39 cases of grade 1 adverse reactions, respectively. After PSM, the postoperative 12-, 18-month recurrence-free survival rates were 83.7%, 83.7% in the 70 patients of Donafenib group and 67.8%, 58.9% in the 56 patients of control group, respectively, showing a significant difference in the postoperative recurrence-free survival time between the two groups ( hazard ratio=0.395, 95% confidence interval as 0.176-0.888, P<0.05). (4) Analysis of risk factors affecting recurrence free survival of patients. Results of multivariate ana-lysis showed that microvascular invasion, vascular thrombus, clinical stage as ⅢA were independent risk factors affecting recurrence-free survival in patients with high risk of recurrence after radical resection of HCC ( hazard ratio=2.181, 2.612, 2.612, 95% confidence interval as 1.028-4.629, 1.128-6.047, 1.128-6.047, P<0.05), Donafenib as postoperative adjuvant therapy was an independent protective factor affecting recurrence-free survival in patients with high risk of recurrence after radical resection of HCC ( hazard ratio=0.457, 95% confidence interval as 0.227-0.920, P<0.05). Results of further analysis showed that after PSM, there were significant differences in the postoperative recurrence-free survival time in patients with different clinical factors, including male, age ≥60 years, tumor diameter >5 cm, positive microvascular invasion, positive hepatitis B virus infection, alpha fetoprotein <200 μg/L, between the Donafenib group and the control group ( hazard ratio=0.283, 0.202, 0.174, 0.345, 0.273, 0.180, 95% confidence interval as 0.114-0.707, 0.044-0.937, 0.038-0.794, 0.128-0.929, 0.091-0.819, 0.052-0.620, P<0.05). Conclusion:Donafenib as postoperative adjuvant therapy can effectively reduce the short-term recurrence rate in patients with high risk of recurrence after radical resection of HCC, with good safety and tolerance.

Objective: To assess the feasibility of HEAD-US scale in the clinical application of hemophilic arthropathy (HA) and propose an optimized ultrasound scoring system. Methods: From July 2015 to August 2017, 1 035 joints ultrasonographic examinations were performed in 91 patients. Melchiorre, HEAD-US (Hemophilic Early Arthropathy Detection with UltraSound) and HEAD-US-C (HEAD-US in China) scale scores were used respectively to analyze the results. The correlations between three ultrasound scales and Hemophilia Joint Health Scores (HJHS) were evaluated. The sensitivity differences of the above Ultrasonic scoring systems in evaluation of HA were compared. Results: All the 91 patients were male, with median age of 16 (4-55) years old, including 86 cases of hemophilia A and 5 cases hemophilia B. The median (P₂₅, P₇₅) of Melchiorre, HEAD-US and HEAD-US-C scores of 1 035 joints were 2(0,6), 1(0,5) and 2(0,6), respectively, and the correlation coefficients compared with HJHS was 0.747, 0.762 and 0.765 respectively, with statistical significance (P<0.001). The positive rates of Melchiorre, HEAD-US-C and HEAD-US scale score were 63.0% (95%CI 59.7%-65.9%), 59.5% (95%CI 56.5%-62.4%) and 56.6% (95%CI 53.6%-59.6%) respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). Even for 336 cases of asymptomatic joints, the positive rates of Melchiorre, HEAD-US-C and HEAD-US scale score were 25.0% (95%CI 20.6%-29.6%), 17.0% (95%CI 12.6%-21.1%) and 11.9% (95%CI 8.4%-15.7%) respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). There were significant changes (P<0.05) in the ultrasonographic score of HA before and after onset of hemorrhage in 107 joints of 40 patients. The difference in variation amplitude of HEAD-US-C scores and HEAD-US scores before and after joint bleeding was statistically significant (P<0.001). Conclusion: Compared with Melchiorre, there were similar good correlations between HEAD-US, HEAD-US-C and HJHS. HEAD-US ultrasound scoring system is quick, convenient and simple to use. The optimized HEAD-US-C scale score is more sensitive than HEAD-US, especially for patients with HA who have subclinical state, which make up for insufficiency of sensitivity in HEAD-US scoring system.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; China ; Hemarthrosis ; Hemophilia A ; Hemophilia B ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Ultrasonography ; Young Adult

Objective: To explore the evaluation of joint injury by HEAD-US-C (Hemophilic Early Arthropathy Detection with UltraSound in China, HEAD-US-C) in patients with moderate or severe hemophilia A treated with prophylaxis vs on-demand. Methods: The patients from June 2015 to July 2017 with moderate or severe hemophilia A were examined by ultrasound imaging of the elbows, knees and ankles; Meanwhile the HEAD-US-C ultrasound assessment scale and hemophilia joint health score scale 2.1 (HJHS2.1) were used to score the joint status. The correlation between the HEAD-US-C and HJHS score was performed in prophylaxis group and on-demand group patients, respectively. Results: A total of 925 cases of joint ultrasonography were conducted in 70 patients with moderate or severe hemophilia A. Among patients with moderate hemophilia, the median (IQR) of HEAD-US-C score and HJHS score in on-demand group were significantly higher than those in the prophylaxis group[1 (0, 6) vs 0.5 (0, 3) , z=0.177, P=0.046],[2 (0, 4) vs 2 (0, 3) z=0.375, P=0.007], even though there was no significant difference of the median (IQR) number of annualized target joints bleeding episodes between on-demand and prophylaxis groups[1 (0, 7) vs 1 (0, 5) , z=1.271, P=0.137]. Unlike in moderate cases, on-demand treatment group had more annualized target joints bleeding episodes than prophylaxis group among patients with severe hemophilia[3 (0, 8) vs 2 (0, 8) , z=0.780 P=0.037]. The prophylaxis group compared favorably with on-demand therapy group in terms of HEAD-US-C score[1 (0, 6) vs 4 (0, 7) , z=2.189, P=0.008], and HJHS score[2 (0, 5) , 4 (1, 6) , z=3646, P<0.001]for the severe hemophilia patients. The positive correlation between HEAD-US-C score and HJHS score was identified (P<0.05) , whether on-demand treatment or prophylaxis groups. The correlation coefficient between HEAD-US-C score and HJHS score in on-demand treatment and prophylaxis groups were 0.739 (95% CI 0.708-0.708) , 0.865 (95% CI 0.848-0.848) respectively, and 95% CI didn't overlap (P<0.05) , indicating that the correlation coefficient in prophylaxis group had stronger correlation than that in on-demand group. Conclusions: Clinical effects of prophylaxis were significantly better than those of on-demand treatment in patients with moderate or se-vere haemophilia A. HEAD-US-C scoring system could effectively evaluate joints damage in hemophilia A patients treated with on-demand or prophylaxis, companied by significantly positive correlation with HJHS clinical evaluation system, and provided objective index for clinical effect assessment.
China ; Hemophilia A ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Joint Diseases ; Ultrasonography