1.Short-to-medium-term clinical efficacy of total hip arthroplasty with Pinnacle ES constrained liner in the treatment of femoral neck fractures associated with lower limb neuromuscular disorders.
Can-Feng WANG ; Xiao-Qing WANG ; Lei HAN ; Yun-Gen HU ; Tuo WANG
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2025;38(11):1151-1155
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the short-to-medium-term clinical efficacy of total hip arthroplasty(THA) with Pinnacle ES constrained liner in the treatment of femoral neck fractures(FNF) associated with lower limb neuromuscular disorders.
METHODS:
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 16 patients who underwent primary THA using Pinnacle ES constrained liner for FNF with lower limb neuromuscular disorders and had complete follow-up data, treated between January 2020 and January 2023. There were 7 males and 9 females, with a mean age of (68.42±3.58) years old ranging from 61 to 75 years old. Among them, 10 cases had left-sided fractures and 6 had right-sided fractures;based on the Garden classification, 11 cases were type Ⅲ and 5 cases were type Ⅳ. The affected limbs were complicated with sequelae of poliomyelitis (2 cases), Parkinson's disease (2 cases), and sequelae of cerebral infarction (12 cases). All operations were performed via a posterolateral approach. Prosthesis position was evaluated using imaging data. Hip function was assessed by the Harris hip score(HHS) and Merle D'Aubigne hip score. During the follow-up period, the occurrence of complications such as prosthetic dislocation, loosening, and infection was recorded.
RESULTS:
One patient died of advanced tumor 2 years after surgery, and the remaining 15 patients were followed up for 24 to 64 months with a mean of (34.8±5.5) months. The operation time ranged from 50 to 90 minutes with a mean of (75.56±8.15) minutes, and the blood loss ranged from 150 to 200 ml with a mean of (170.32±12.56) ml. All patients achieved primary wound healing after surgery. Intraoperatively, femoral calcar splitting occurred in 2 cases, which were treated with titanium cable binding;no neurovascular injuries were observed in any case. The mean HHS increased from (18.95±2.25) preoperatively to (88.02±2.42) at the last follow-up, and the mean Merle D'Aubigne Score increased from (3.05±0.06) preoperatively to (16.65±0.93) at the last follow-up. Postoperative follow-up X-rays showed good prosthetic position, and no complications such as dislocation, prosthetic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, or deep infection occurred during the follow-up period.
CONCLUSION
Total hip arthroplasty with Pinnacle ES constrained liner is effective in the treatment of femoral neck fractures associated with lower limb neuromuscular disorders. It can significantly improve hip function, reduce the postoperative prosthetic dislocation rate, provide good initial stability, and achieve satisfactory short-to-medium-term clinical efficacy.
Humans
;
Male
;
Female
;
Middle Aged
;
Aged
;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods*
;
Femoral Neck Fractures/complications*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Neuromuscular Diseases/surgery*
;
Lower Extremity
;
Treatment Outcome
2.Sparing piriformis and internus repairing externus vs. other conventional approaches for hip hemiarthroplasty: A report of early outcomes from a single UK trauma unit.
Michael APOSTOLIDES ; William THOMAS ; Darren LEONG ; Bogdan ROBU ; Nimesh PATEL
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2025;28(5):324-329
PURPOSE:
Over 30,000 hip hemiarthroplasties for neck of femur fractures are performed annually in the United Kingdom (UK). The national recommendation is via the lateral approach, to reduce the risk of dislocation, with the potential expense of reduced function and mobility post-operatively. Muscle-sparing approaches, such as SPAIRE (sparing piriformis and internus repairing externus), have been invented to address the issue of dislocation.
METHODS:
We performed a retrospective data collection at a single center with a high annual volume of hip hemiarthroplasties over 12 months. All patients who had hip hemiarthroplasty as their primary treatment were included. Patients who passed away and were non-ambulant before their surgery were excluded from the study. Our primary outcome was the dislocation rate and secondary outcomes were the time to mobilization after surgery and the duration of surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using XLSTAT software.
RESULTS:
We identified 194 cases, and these were divided into 3 groups based on the surgical approach: SPAIRE (n = 43), lateral (n = 97), and posterior (n = 54). Groups had similar demographics and a minimum 3-month follow-up after surgery. There were no dislocations in the SPAIRE group, whereas the dislocation rate for the other 2 groups was 2.5% in the lateral and 9.1% in the posterior groups at 6 months post-surgery. There was an earlier return to mobility in the SPAIRE (1.4 day) compared to the 2 other groups ( 2 days and 2.6 days). Average surgical times were very similar among all 3 groups (74 min vs. 79 min vs. 71 min).
CONCLUSION
The SPAIRE approach seems to be safe and provides a low risk of dislocation and good post-operative function for patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasties.
Humans
;
Hemiarthroplasty/methods*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Female
;
Male
;
Aged
;
United Kingdom
;
Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery*
;
Middle Aged
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods*
;
Trauma Centers
;
Hip Dislocation/prevention & control*
;
Postoperative Complications/prevention & control*
3.Risk factors of perioperative deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture.
Yonggang WANG ; Kai FU ; Wei ZHENG ; Qianying CAI ; Shengbao CHEN ; Changqing ZHANG ; Xianyou ZHENG
Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery 2024;38(11):1336-1339
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the incidence of perioperative deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of lower extremities and its risk factors in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture.
METHODS:
The clinical data of 4 109 elderly patients with femoral neck fracture admitted between August 2012 and November 2020 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, there were 1 137 males and 2 972 females; their ages ranged from 65 to 101 years, with an average of 77.0 years. The time from fracture to admission ranged from 1 to 360 hours, with an average of 35.2 hours. There were 1 858 cases of hemiarthroplasty, 1 617 cases of total hip arthroplasty, and 634 cases of internal fixation surgery. The preoperative age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (aCCI) was 4 (3, 5). Perioperative DVT occurred in 857 cases (20.9%). Univariate analysis was performed on age, gender, body mass index, fracture side, time from fracture to admission, operation type, anesthesia type, blood transfusion, blood pressure after admission, and preoperative aCCI in patients with and without perioperative DVT, and logistic regression analysis was used to screen the risk factors of perioperative DVT in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture.
RESULTS:
Univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in age, gender, time from fracture to admission, operation type, and preoperative aCCI between the two groups ( P<0.05). Further logistic regression analysis showed that age>75 years, female patients, time from fracture to admission>24 hours, and preoperative aCCI>5 were risk factors for perioperative DVT ( P<0.05).
CONCLUSION
Elderly patients with femoral neck fracture have a higher incidence of perioperative DVT. The advanced aged and female patients, patients with longer fracture time and more comorbidities need to pay special attention to the prevention of perioperative DVT to minimize the occurrence of DVT during femoral neck fractures.
Humans
;
Femoral Neck Fractures/complications*
;
Female
;
Male
;
Aged
;
Venous Thrombosis/epidemiology*
;
Risk Factors
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Lower Extremity/blood supply*
;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects*
;
Incidence
;
Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods*
;
Postoperative Complications/etiology*
;
Perioperative Period
;
Logistic Models
;
Hemiarthroplasty/adverse effects*
4.Research progress of caput femoris posterior tilt and its impact on prognosis in nondisplaced femoral neck fractures.
Rong-Yao YU ; Qing-Jiang PANG ; Xian-Jun CHEN ; Xiao YU ; Lin SHI ; Cheng-Hao WANG ; Sheng YU ; Chen-Tong PAN
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2023;36(10):969-974
There are still many unresolved problems in the treatment and prognosis of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures, such as nonunion and avascular necrosis of the caput femoris .In order to reduce the risk of various complications after non-displaced femoral neck fractures, the caput femoris posterior tilt of femoral neck fractures and its impact on prognosis have attracted more and more attention. A large number of scholars' studies have found that when the posterior tilt exceeds 20°, the risk of internal fixation failure increases significantly. Based on this concept, we can choose to use primary artificial joint replacement instead of three-screw internal fixation according to the different posterior tilt angles of patients to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications. At the same time, our analysis found that comminution of the posterior segment of the femoral neck would lead to an increase in the posterior inclination angles. The purpose of this review was to investigate the relationship between caput femoris posterior tilt of femoral neck fractures and surgical outcome, and to introduce a new method for measuring caput femoris posterior tilt of the femoral neck.
Humans
;
Prognosis
;
Postoperative Complications/epidemiology*
;
Femoral Neck Fractures/complications*
;
Femur Neck
;
Reoperation
;
Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods*
;
Retrospective Studies
5.Ultrasound-guided continuous fascia iliaca compartment block for perioperative pain management in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.
Chun-Xiu LI ; Wen-Chao GE ; Kang-Ning YANG ; Hua-Yong ZHENG ; Xiao-Wei WANG ; Ye-Lai WANG ; Jie GAO ; Wen-Zhi GUO
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2023;36(11):1046-1051
OBJECTIVE:
To study the effect of ultrasound-guided fascia iliaca compartment block on perioperative analgesia and postoperative complications in geriatric patients with hip fractures.
METHODS:
A total of 127 elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery from January 2021 to September 2021 were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided continuous fascia iliaca compartment block(group F) either intravenous analgesia control group(group C). There were 62 cases in group F, including 19 males and 43 females with an average age of (82.4±7.2) years old ranging from 66 to 95 years old, involving 25 femoral neck fractures and 37 femoral intertrochanteric fractures. There were 65 cases in control group, including 18 males and 47 females, with an average age of (81.4±8.7) years old ranging from 65 to 94 years old, involving 29 femoral neck fractures and 36 femoral intertrochanteric fractures. The visual analogue scale(VAS), minimental state examination (MMSE), observer's assessment of alertness/sedation(OAA/S) scale, modified Bromage score, postoperative complications and general conditions during hospitalization in two groups were observed.
RESULTS:
The resting and exercise VAS at 30 min after block, anesthesia placement and 6, 24 and 48 h after surgery were lower than those in group C(P<0.05). In group F, MMSE scores at 12 h before surgery, and 1, 3 d after surgery and OAA/S scores at 3 d after surgery were higher than those in group C(P<0.05). The incidence of adverse effects and the number requiring additional analgesia were lower than those in group C(P<0.05). Group F had better perioperative analgesia satisfaction and hospital stay than group C(P<0.05). But there was no significant difference regarding Bromage score and 30-day mortality between two group(P>0.05).
CONCLUSION
Ultrasound-guided continuous fascia iliacus space block was safe and effective for elderly patients with hip fracture, and could significantly reduce perioperative pain, improve postoperative cognitive function, and reduce postoperative complications, thereby shortening hospital stay and improving the quality of life during hospitalization.
Male
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Pain Management
;
Nerve Block
;
Quality of Life
;
Hip Fractures/surgery*
;
Pain/surgery*
;
Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery*
;
Femoral Fractures/surgery*
;
Ultrasonography, Interventional
;
Postoperative Complications/surgery*
;
Fascia
;
Pain, Postoperative
6.Risk factors and prognosis of preoperative herat failure after hip fracture.
Yan-Hui GUO ; Ye-Lai WANG ; Tian-Sheng SUN ; Zhi LIU ; Jian-Zheng ZHANG ; Xiao-Wei WANG
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2023;36(12):1114-1119
OBJECTIVE:
To explore incidence, risk factors and the relationship between preoperative heart failure and prognosis in elderly patients with hip fracture.
METHODS:
A retrospective analysis was performed on 1 569 elderly patients with hip fracture treated from January 2012 to December 2019, including 522 males and 1 047 females, aged 81.00 (75.00, 90.00) years old;896 intertrochanteric fractures and 673 femoral neck fractures. Patients were divided into heart failure and non-heart failure groups according to whether they developed heart failure before surgery, and heart failure was set as the dependent variable, with independent variables including age, gender, fracture type, comorbidities and hematological indicators, etc. Univariate analysis was performed at first, and independent variables with statistical differences were included in multivariate Logistic regression analysis. Independent risk factors for preoperative heart failure were obtained. The length of hospital stay, perioperative complications, mortality at 30 days and 1 year after surgery were compared between heart failure and non-heart failure groups.
RESULTS:
There were 91 patients in heart failure group, including 40 males and 51 females, aged 82.00 (79.00, 87.00) years old;55 patients with intertrochanteric fracture and 36 patients with femoral neck fracture. There were 1 478 patients in non-heart failure groups, including 482 males and 996 females, aged 81.00(75.00, 86.00) years old;841 patients with intertrochanteric fracture and 637 patients with femoral neck fracture. There were significant differences in age, sex, coronary heart disease, arrhythmia and dementia between two groups(P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic analysis of statistically significant factors showed that males(OR=1.609, P=0.032), age(OR=1.032, P=0.031), arrhythmia(OR=2.045, P=0.006), dementia (OR=2.106, P=0.014) were independent risk factor for preoperative heart failure. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 9.9% and 26.4% in heart failure group and 3.6% and 13.8% in non-heart failure group, respectively;and had statistical significance between two groups (P<0.05). There were significant differences in pulmonary infection, cerebrovascular complications and cardiovascular complications between two groups (P<0.05). The duration of hospitalization in heart failure group was (16.21±10.64) d compared with that in non-heart failure group (13.26±8.00) d, and the difference was statistically significant (t=2.513, P=0.012).
CONCLUSION
Male, old age, arrhythmia and dementia are independent risk factors for heart failure after hip fracture in elderly patients. Patients with preoperative heart failure have a higher incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection, cerebrovascular and cardiovascular complications, higher mortality at 30 d and 1 year after surgery, and longer hospital stay.
Aged
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Hip Fractures/surgery*
;
Femoral Neck Fractures
;
Heart Failure/etiology*
;
Prognosis
;
Heart Diseases
;
Risk Factors
;
Postoperative Complications/etiology*
;
Dementia
;
Arrhythmias, Cardiac
7.Surgical treatment for ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fracture.
Bang DOU ; Wen-Qian MA ; Tao QIN ; Wei ZHU ; Ya-Hui DAI ; Xiao-Bin XU
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2023;36(3):203-208
OBJECTIVE:
To retrospectively analyze efficacy of single structure internal fixation and double structure internal fixation in the treatment of ipsilateral femoral shaft and neck fracture, and analyze their indications.
METHODS:
From June 2015 to December 2020, 21 patients with ipsilateral femoral shaft and femoral neck fracture were treated, including 14 males and 7 females, aged 23 to 69 years old with an average of(38.1±12.9) years old. According to different femoral shaft fracture sites, some patients were fixed with cephalomedullary implant for both femoral neck and the femoral shaft(single structure, InterTan or PFNA Ⅱ), some patients were fixed with cannulated screws for the femoral neck and a retrograde locking nail for the femoral shaft (dual structure), and postoperative function and complications were recorded during follow-up. In 10 cases of single-structure fixation, the femoral necks were all basicervical fractures, and the femoral shaft fractures were located in the proximal isthmus;11 cases were double-structure fixation, 9 cases in 11 were basal type of femoral neck, 2 cases in 11 were neck type, and the femoral shaft fractures were located in the isthmus and the distal isthmus.
RESULTS:
All patients were followed up for 12 to 27 months. No femoral head necrosis, deformity, delay or nonunion occurred in the patients with single-structure fixation, and no delayed union or nonunion occurred in femoral shaft fractures;At the final follow-up, Harris score of patients with single-structure fixation was 91.8±4.1, with 8 cases were excellent and 2 cases were good. The fractures of patients with dual-structure fixation achieved good union without femoral head necrosis, except 1 case of femoral shaft fracture had delayed union;At the final follow-up, Harris score of patients with dual-structure fixation was 92.4±5.9, 7 cases were excellent, 3 cases were good, and 1 case was fair.
CONCLUSION
Good reduction and fixation is the key to the treatment of such fractures. Both the single-structure fixation and the dual-structure fixation are good methods, and it should be selected according to the locations of femoral shaft and femoral neck fractures. Single-structure fixation is a good choice for femoral shaft fractures located at the proximal isthmus and basal femoral neck fractures. For isthmus and distal femoral shaft fractures combined with ipsilateral femoral neck fractures, dual-structure fixation is recommended.
Male
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Young Adult
;
Adult
;
Middle Aged
;
Aged
;
Femur Neck
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Femoral Neck Fractures/complications*
;
Femoral Fractures/complications*
;
Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods*
;
Femoral Fractures, Distal
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/methods*
8.Disastrous triad of femoral head:femoral neck fracture meeting fracture-dislocation of femoral head.
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2023;36(3):216-221
Femoral head and ipsilateral femoral neck fractures are serious and complicated injuries, which usually yield unsatisfactory results using conventional hip-preserving surgery. The key point of the management and prognosis mainly lies in femoral neck fractures. An apparent and consecutive relationship exists between femoral neck fractures and femoral head fracture-hip dislocation in such injuries. It is believed that disastrous triad of femoral head (DTFH) could summarize these specific injuries, and reflect the injury mechanism and prognostic characteristics. Based on our clinical observation and literature review, DTFH could be divided into three subgroups:TypeⅠ, common DTFH, in which femoral neck fractures occur following femoral head fractures-hip dislocation due to the same trauma; TypeⅡ, iatrogenic DTFH, in which femoral neck fractures come out in the caring process of femoral head fractures-hip dislocation; Type Ⅲ, stressed DTFH, in which femoral neck fractures occur after the management of femoral head fractures-hip dislocation. In the scenario, the line of femoral neck fractures locates distally to the femoral head fractures. Herein, we will discuss clinical characteristics of these types of DTFH.
Humans
;
Femoral Fractures/complications*
;
Femoral Neck Fractures/complications*
;
Femur Head/injuries*
;
Fracture Dislocation
;
Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods*
;
Hip Dislocation/surgery*
;
Prognosis
9.Femoral head necrosis rate and risk factors after internal fixation of femoral neck fracture:a Meta-analysis.
Huan WANG ; Chun-Xia HAN ; Zi-Sheng AI
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2022;35(4):390-399
OBJECTIVE:
To study the incidence and risk factors of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) after internal fixation in adult patients with femoral neck fracture (FNF) after 2000, and identify high-risk population of ONFH.
METHODS:
PubMed, Medline, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP Database were searched to collect all the literatures on ONFH and related risk factors after internal fixation of FNF from January 1th 2000 to July 1th 2020. Study extraction was performed according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Endnote X9 and Excel 2019 were used for literatures extraction, management and data entry, and R Studio 3.6.5 software was used for Meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and publication bias detection were used to explore the sources of heterogeneity and the reliability of the evaluation results.
RESULTS:
A total of 16 studies with 5521 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that the incidence of ONFH after internal fixation for adult FNF was 14.5% [95% CI(0.126-0.165)]. Fracture displacement[OR=0.27, 95%CI(0.21-0.35)] and reduction quality [OR=0.15, 95%CI(0.09-0.27)] were related risk factors for ONFH. The results of subgroup rate analysis showed that the non-displaced fracture necrosis rate was 6.2%[95%CI(0.051-0.077)] and the displaced fracture necrosis rate was 20.4% [95%CI(0.166-0.249)];the good reduction fracture necrosis rate was 8.3%[95%CI(0.072-0.095)] and the poor reduction fracture necrosis rate was 35.5%[95%CI(0.233-0.500)]. The included literatures have good consistency and no publication bias.
CONCLUSION
After 2000, the total incidence of ONFH after internal fixation of adult FNF has decreased, while the necrosis rates of patients with displaced fracture and poor reduction are still at a high level. The interval between injury and surgery was not analyzed in this study because of the inconstant division in the original literature.
Adult
;
Femoral Neck Fractures/complications*
;
Femur Head
;
Femur Head Necrosis/surgery*
;
Humans
;
Reproducibility of Results
;
Risk Factors
10.Does total hip arthroplasty provide better outcomes than hemiarthroplasty for the femoral neck fracture? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wei PENG ; Na BI ; Jun ZHENG ; Na XI
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2020;23(6):356-362
PURPOSE:
By comparing the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty with hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture to investigate the one-year mortality, dislocation, infection, reoperation rate, and thromboembolic event.
METHODS:
The PubMed, EMBASE databases, and Cochrane library were systematically searched from the inception dates to April 1, 2020 for relevant randomized controlled trials in English language using the keywords: "total hip arthroplasty", "hemiarthroplasty" and "femoral neck fracture" to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Two reviewers independently selected articles, extracted data, assessed the quality evidence and risk bias of included trials using the Cochrane Collaboration' stools, and discussed any disagreements. The third reviewer was consulted for any doubts or uncertainty. We derived risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Mortality was defined as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were other complications, dislocation, infection, reoperation rate, and thromboembolic event.
RESULTS:
This meta-analysis included 10 studies with 1419 patients, which indicated that there were no significant differences between hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty in reoperation, infection rate, and thromboembolic event. However, there was a lower mortality and dislocation rate association with total hip arthroplasty at the one-year follow-up.
CONCLUSION
Based on our results, we found that total hip arthroplasty was better than hemiarthroplasty for a hip fracture at one-year follow-up.
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods*
;
Female
;
Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery*
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Hemiarthroplasty/methods*
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Postoperative Complications/epidemiology*
;
Reoperation/statistics & numerical data*
;
Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology*
;
Thromboembolism/epidemiology*
;
Time Factors
;
Treatment Outcome

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail