BACKGROUND:Direct anterior approach has been reported to be associated with a risk of reaming the anterior column of the acetabulum,but there is little evidence supporting this opinion.OBJECTIVE:To reveal differences in the bone stock of the anterior and posterior columns between the direct anterior approach and the posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty by CT measurement.METHODS:Sixty cases of primary total hip arthroplasty through direct anterior approach (n=30) or posterolateral approach (n=30) at Fuzhou Second Hospital of Xiamen University from October 2015 to December 2017 were enrolled.The cross-sectional area of the anterior and posterior column of the acetabulum,the height of the anterior and posterior column,acetabular diameter,and anteversion were measured by CT.All researchers had 5-10 years of clinical experience,and the surgeons were associate chief physicians or above.The trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Fuzhou Second Hospital of Xiamen University on June 1,2017.All patients signed the written informed consents.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1) The postoperative cross-sectional area of the anterior and posterior column of the acetabulum,and the height of the anterior and posterior column in the two groups were less than those at baseline (P ＜ 0.05),the acetabular diameter was larger than that at baseline (P ＜ 0.01),and the anteversion showed no significant difference (P ＞ 0.05).The area of the anterior column in the direct anterior approach group was higher than that in the posterolateral approach group (P ＜ 0.05),and other parameters were insignificantly different between two groups (P ＞ 0.05).(2) in summary,compared with posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty,direct anterior approach leads to increased area of the anterior column,and made no effect on other parameters.Thereafter,direct anterior approach is not a risk factor for eccentric reaming the anterior column of acetabulum,and the conclusion needs to be confirmed by multicenter,prospective randomized controlled trials.

Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the treatment of anteromedial knee osteoarthritis or spontaneous osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle.Methods:Between June 2017 and June 2018, 62 consecutive patients were treated at Department of Joint Surgery, Fuzhou Second Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University for anteromedial knee osteoarthritis or spontaneous osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle using a fixed-bearing UKA system. They were 27 men and 35 women, aged from 58 to 85 years (average, 69.8 years). There were 58 cases of anteromedial knee osteoarthritis and 4 cases of spontaneous osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle. The courses of disease ranged from 2 to 10 years (average, 5.1 years). Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty was performed for all the patients on the fixation platform SLED. Recorded were the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) of the patients 2 days after operation, Oxford knee score (OKS) and American Knee Society score (KSS) at the final follow-up and post-operative complications.Results:The 62 patients were followed up for 9 to 21 months (average, 15.6 months). Tibial plateau fracture occurred in one case who eventually obtained bony union after open reduction and internal fixation. Another case had a wound healing problem which responded to drainage and debridement with prosthesis preservation. Another case presented prepatellar pain which was improved after physical therapy. In the 62 patients, the HKA 2 days after operation (172.27°±1.61°) was significantly improved compared to the preoperative value (177.79°±1.32°), the OKS at the final follow-up (19.8±2.7) significantly lower than the preoperative value (50.2±3.1), and the KSS at the final follow-up (89.7±2.6) significantly higher than the preoperative value (49.6±5.2) (all P<0.05). Follow-ups revealed no cases of joint infection or prosthetic loosening. Conclusion:Fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty can lead to fine short-term outcomes for anteromedial knee osteoarthritis or spontaneous osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most difficult complication following total joint arthroplasty. Most of the etiological strains, accounting for over 98% of PJI, are bacterial species, with Staphylococcusaureus and Coagulase-negative staphylococci present in between 50% and 60% of all PJIs. Fungi, though rare, can also cause PJI in 1%-2% of cases and can be challenging to manage. The management of this uncommon but complex condition is challenging due to the absence of a consistent algorithm. Diagnosis of fungal PJI is difficult as isolation of the organisms by traditional culture may take a long time, and some of the culture-negative PJI can be caused by fungal organisms. In recent years, the introduction of next-generation sequencing has provided opportunity for isolation of the infective organisms in culture-negative PJI cases. The suggested treatment is based on consensus and includes operative and non-operative measures. Two-stage revision surgery is the most reliable surgical option for chronic PJI caused by fungi. Pharmacological therapy with antifungal agents is required for a long period of time with antibiotics and included to cover superinfections with bacterial species. The aim of this review article is to report the most up-to-date information on the diagnosis and treatment of fungal PJI with the intention of providing clear guidance to clinicians, researchers and surgeons.
Arthritis, Infectious/etiology* ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects* ; Fungi ; Humans ; Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy* ; Retrospective Studies