1.Diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: a Systematic Review.
Jung Ho PARK ; Jeong Sik BYEON ; Woon Geon SHIN ; Young Hun YOON ; Jae Hee CHEON ; Kwang Jae LEE ; Hyojin PARK
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2010;55(5):308-315
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a very common functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by abdominal discomfort, bloating, and disturbed defecation. Patients with IBS have a tendency to visit physicians more frequently than those without IBS, thus annual economic consequences of IBS in the Western countries are substantial. Therefore, guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of IBS patients have been designed to give a favored effect on the Department of Gastroenterology's overall performance. A variety of criteria have been developed to identify a combination of symptoms to diagnose IBS, including Manning and Rome I, II, and III criteria. Overall, Manning's criteria had a pooled sensitivity and specificity, 78% and 72%, respectively. In addition, the Rome I criteria had a sensitivity and specificity, 71% and 85%, respectively. However, none described the accuracy of Rome II and III yet. Alarm features such as rectal bleeding and nocturnal pain offer little discriminative value in separating patients with IBS from those with organic diseases. Even though anemia and weight loss have poor sensitivity for organic diseases, they offer very good specificity. Since specific biomarker of IBS is not yet available, diagnostic tests are frequently performed to exclude organic diseases. However, the accuracy of diagnostic tests is disappointing. CBC, chemistry, thyroid function test, stool exam, ultrasonography, hydrogen breath test, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein have all very limited accuracy in discriminating IBS from organic diseases. This systemic review is targeted to establish the strategy of IBS treatment, which is very necessary for the current clinical practice.
Blood Cell Count
;
Blood Sedimentation
;
Breath Tests
;
C-Reactive Protein/analysis
;
Feces/enzymology/parasitology
;
Humans
;
Irritable Bowel Syndrome/*diagnosis
;
Severity of Illness Index
;
Thyroid Function Tests
2.Diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: a Systematic Review.
Jung Ho PARK ; Jeong Sik BYEON ; Woon Geon SHIN ; Young Hun YOON ; Jae Hee CHEON ; Kwang Jae LEE ; Hyojin PARK
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2010;55(5):308-315
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a very common functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by abdominal discomfort, bloating, and disturbed defecation. Patients with IBS have a tendency to visit physicians more frequently than those without IBS, thus annual economic consequences of IBS in the Western countries are substantial. Therefore, guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of IBS patients have been designed to give a favored effect on the Department of Gastroenterology's overall performance. A variety of criteria have been developed to identify a combination of symptoms to diagnose IBS, including Manning and Rome I, II, and III criteria. Overall, Manning's criteria had a pooled sensitivity and specificity, 78% and 72%, respectively. In addition, the Rome I criteria had a sensitivity and specificity, 71% and 85%, respectively. However, none described the accuracy of Rome II and III yet. Alarm features such as rectal bleeding and nocturnal pain offer little discriminative value in separating patients with IBS from those with organic diseases. Even though anemia and weight loss have poor sensitivity for organic diseases, they offer very good specificity. Since specific biomarker of IBS is not yet available, diagnostic tests are frequently performed to exclude organic diseases. However, the accuracy of diagnostic tests is disappointing. CBC, chemistry, thyroid function test, stool exam, ultrasonography, hydrogen breath test, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein have all very limited accuracy in discriminating IBS from organic diseases. This systemic review is targeted to establish the strategy of IBS treatment, which is very necessary for the current clinical practice.
Blood Cell Count
;
Blood Sedimentation
;
Breath Tests
;
C-Reactive Protein/analysis
;
Feces/enzymology/parasitology
;
Humans
;
Irritable Bowel Syndrome/*diagnosis
;
Severity of Illness Index
;
Thyroid Function Tests
3.Molecular Identification of Taenia Tapeworms by Cox1 Gene in Koh Kong, Cambodia.
Hyeong Kyu JEON ; Tai Soon YONG ; Woon Mok SOHN ; Jong Yil CHAI ; Sung Jong HONG ; Eun Taek HAN ; Hoo Gn JEONG ; Tep CHHAKDA ; Muth SINUON ; Duong SOCHEAT ; Keeseon S EOM
The Korean Journal of Parasitology 2011;49(2):195-197
We collected fecal samples from 21 individuals infected with Taenia tapeworms in Koh Kong Province, Cambodia, and performed nucleotide sequencing of the cox1 gene and multiplex PCR on the eggs for DNA differential diagnosis of human Taenia tapeworms. Genomic DNA was extracted from the eggs of a minimum number of 10 isolated from fecal samples. Using oligonucleotide primers Ta7126F, Ts7313F, Tso7466F, and Rev7915, the multiplex PCR assay proved useful for differentially diagnosing Taenia solium, Taenia saginata, and Taenia asiatica based on 706, 629, and 474 bp bands, respectively. All of the Taenia specimens from Kho Kong, Cambodia, were identified as either T. saginata (n=19) or T. solium (n=2) by cox1 sequencing and multiplex PCR.
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Animals
;
Cambodia
;
Child
;
Cyclooxygenase 1/*genetics
;
DNA Primers/genetics
;
DNA, Helminth/chemistry/genetics
;
Feces/parasitology
;
Female
;
Helminth Proteins/*genetics
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Polymerase Chain Reaction
;
Sequence Analysis, DNA
;
Taenia saginata/*enzymology/*genetics/isolation & purification
;
Taenia solium/*enzymology/*genetics/isolation & purification
;
Taeniasis/*parasitology
;
Young Adult