1.High-resolution Anorectal Manometry and Anal Endosonographic Findings in the Evaluation of Fecal Incontinence.
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2012;18(4):450-451
No abstract available.
Fecal Incontinence
;
Manometry
2.Role of Permacol Injection in the Treatment of Patients With Fecal Incontinence.
Annals of Coloproctology 2016;32(2):49-50
No abstract available.
Fecal Incontinence*
;
Humans
3.Constipation Is Also an Important Cause of Fecal Incontinence in Old People: Author's Reply.
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2012;18(3):346-347
No abstract available.
Constipation
;
Fecal Incontinence
4.Constipation Is Also an Important Cause of Fecal Incontinence in Old People.
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2012;18(3):345-345
No abstract available.
Constipation
;
Fecal Incontinence
6.Biofeedback Therapy in Constipation and Fecal Incontinence.
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2010;16(2):110-112
No abstract available.
Biofeedback, Psychology
;
Constipation
;
Fecal Incontinence
7.Perineal Reconstructive Surgery of a Cloaca-Like Perineal Defect: A Case Report.
Hae Il JUNG ; Sang Ho BAE ; Moo Jun BAEK ; Chang Ho KIM ; Hyung Sik AHN
Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology 2009;25(6):437-440
The perineal defect in female genitalia results from multiple etiologies, including obstetric injury, sexual assaults, and perineal trauma. Untreated defects may lead to significant physical, functional, and esthetic complaints. Numerous reconstruction methods are used for a perineal defect, but various complications, such as fecal impaction, fecal incontinence, and wound disruption, are introduced. We report a case of a 40-yr-old woman with a cloaca-like perineal defect, who was treated with reconstructive surgery of the perineal defect and recovered with a good anatomical and functional outcome.
Fecal Impaction
;
Fecal Incontinence
;
Female
;
Genitalia, Female
;
Humans
8.Diagnosis and Treatment of Fecal Incontinence.
Soo Kyung PARK ; Seung Jae MYUNG
Korean Journal of Medicine 2012;83(5):580-584
Fecal incontinence is a common condition, which leads to impaired quality of life and huge financial cost at an individual and societal level. Recent studies have identified novel and potentially modifiable risk factors. Newer diagnostic modalities are giving more detailed information about underlying disorders, helping to implement targeted treatment. Many therapeutic options exist, and newer treatments are changing outcomes. This article will review recent developments in mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of fecal incontinence.
Fecal Incontinence
;
Quality of Life
;
Risk Factors
9.Management of Neurogenic Fecal Incontinence and Constipation in Myelodysplastic Children by Malone Antegrade Colonic Enema Procedure: Early Experiences.
Hyeon JEONG ; Sung Eun JUNG ; Eun Sik LEE ; Kwang Myung KIM ; Sang Eun LEE ; Hwang CHOI
Korean Journal of Urology 2000;41(2):265-269
No abstract available.
Child*
;
Colon*
;
Constipation*
;
Enema*
;
Fecal Incontinence*
;
Humans
10.Diagnostic Value of Pudendal Nerve Conduction Study and Relationship with Anal Manometry in Fecal Incontinence.
Jung Min LEE ; Soo Jeong HAN ; Eun Geol SIM ; Soon Sup CHUNG ; Tae Sik YOON
Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2009;33(5):595-599
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) and the relationship with manometric profiles in patients with fecal incontinence. METHOD: A total of 29 patients with fecal incontinence who visited colorectal clinic were recruited. The PNTMLs of 29 patients were compared with those of normal controls (2.03+/-0.39) using one-sample t test. Patients were classified into three groups according to pudendal nerve latency; Group I (normal latency, n=8), group II (unilaterally delayed latency, n=9), group III (bilaterally delayed latency, n=12) and compared with manometric parameters (mean maximal resting pressure, mean maximal squeezing pressure, 1st sense volume, urge sense volume, maximal tolerance volume). RESULTS: The PNTML is 3.83+/-2.19 in right side, 4.57+/-2.19 in left side which are significantly delayed in patients with fecal incontinence compare to that of normal controls, 2.03+/-0.39. (p=0.031 in Rt., p=0.000 in Lt.) Among group I~III, there were no statistically significant differences in the values of mean maximal resting pressure, mean maximal squeezing pressure, 1st sense volume, urge sense volume and maximal tolerance volume. There was no correlation between the PNTML and any of manometric parameters. CONCLUSION: The PNTML is valuable in diagnosing patients with fecal incontinence. It is suggested that combined assessments are necessary to identify the cause of fecal incontinence.
Fecal Incontinence
;
Humans
;
Manometry
;
Pudendal Nerve