1.Comparison of postoperative paresthesia after sagittal split osteotomy among different fixation methods: a one year follow-up study
Reza TABRIZI ; Kousha BAKRANI ; Farshid BASTAMI
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2019;45(4):215-219
OBJECTIVES:
Postoperative paresthesia is a common complication after sagittal split osteotomy (SSO). This study aimed to compare paresthesia among different fixation methods one year postoperative.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
This prospective cohort study assessed subjects in four groups: class II with miniplate fixation (Group 1), class II with three-screw fixation (Group 2), class III with miniplate fixation (Group 3), and class III with three-screw fixation (Group 4). Paresthesia was evaluated one year postoperative based on a 0-10 visual analogue scale. Pearson correlation was used to evaluate associations of age and mandibular movement with paresthesia. ANOVA was used to compare paresthesia among groups.
RESULTS:
A total of 80 subjects were enrolled, with 20 subjects in each of the four groups. The Pearson correlation test demonstrated a significant correlation between mandibular movement and paresthesia (P=0.001). Comparison of paresthesia among the groups showed significant differences among groups 1 and 2, 2 and 3, and 3 and 4 (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION
The three-screw fixation method led to more paresthesia one year postoperative compared with miniplate fixation. In addition, the magnitude of mandibular movement had a positive correlation with paresthesia.
2.Comparison of postoperative paresthesia after sagittal split osteotomy among different fixation methods: a one year follow-up study
Reza TABRIZI ; Kousha BAKRANI ; Farshid BASTAMI
Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2019;45(4):215-219
OBJECTIVES: Postoperative paresthesia is a common complication after sagittal split osteotomy (SSO). This study aimed to compare paresthesia among different fixation methods one year postoperative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study assessed subjects in four groups: class II with miniplate fixation (Group 1), class II with three-screw fixation (Group 2), class III with miniplate fixation (Group 3), and class III with three-screw fixation (Group 4). Paresthesia was evaluated one year postoperative based on a 0-10 visual analogue scale. Pearson correlation was used to evaluate associations of age and mandibular movement with paresthesia. ANOVA was used to compare paresthesia among groups. RESULTS: A total of 80 subjects were enrolled, with 20 subjects in each of the four groups. The Pearson correlation test demonstrated a significant correlation between mandibular movement and paresthesia (P=0.001). Comparison of paresthesia among the groups showed significant differences among groups 1 and 2, 2 and 3, and 3 and 4 (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The three-screw fixation method led to more paresthesia one year postoperative compared with miniplate fixation. In addition, the magnitude of mandibular movement had a positive correlation with paresthesia.
Cohort Studies
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Mandible
;
Mandibular Nerve
;
Methods
;
Osteotomy
;
Paresthesia
;
Prospective Studies