1.Comparison of marginal bone loss and patient satisfaction in single and double-implant assisted mandibular overdenture by immediate loading.
Sara TAVAKOLIZADEH ; Fariborz VAFAEE ; Masume KHOSHHAL ; Zahra EBRAHIMZADEH
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2015;7(3):191-198
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the coronal bone level and patient satisfaction in 1-implant and 2-implant assisted mandibular overdentures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients who had maladaptive mandibular dentures were treated in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. The first group received 1 implant (Simple line II, Implantium, South Korea) in their mandibular midline and the second group received 2 implants in their B and D regions (according to Misch's category). If the primary stability of each implant was at least 60 ISQ, ball attachment was placed and denture relined with soft liner. After 6 weeks, retentive cap incorporated with hard acrylic resin. In the 6 and 12 months recalls, periapical digital radiograph were made and visual analogue scale questionnaires were used to record patient satisfaction. The Friedman test was done for comparing the presurgical and postsurgical parameters in each group and the U-Mann Whitney test (P<.05) was done for comparison of post-treatment results between the two groups. RESULTS: All implants achieved sufficient primary stability to be immediately loaded. Patient satisfaction was high, and there were no significant differences between two groups (P>.05). In addition, mean marginal bone loss was 0.6 +/- 0.67 mm in the first group and 0.6 +/- 0.51 mm in the second group, after 12 month. Mean marginal bone loss showed no significant differences between two groups. CONCLUSION: This preliminary one-year result indicated that mandibular overdentures anchored to a single implant can be a safe and cost-effective method as a starting step for implant-overdenture treatment.
Denture, Overlay*
;
Dentures
;
Humans
;
Patient Satisfaction*
;
Surveys and Questionnaires
2.Bond strength of resin cement to CO2 and Er:YAG laser-treated zirconia ceramic.
Shahin KASRAEI ; Loghman REZAEI-SOUFI ; Bijan HEIDARI ; Fariborz VAFAEE
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2014;39(4):296-302
OBJECTIVES: It is difficult to achieve adhesion between resin cement and zirconia ceramics using routine surface preparation methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of CO2 and Er:YAG laser treatment on the bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in-vitro study 45 zirconia disks (6 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) were assigned to 3 groups (n = 15). In control group (CNT) no laser treatment was used. In groups COL and EYL, CO2 and Er:YAG lasers were used for pretreatment of zirconia surface, respectively. Composite resin disks were cemented on zirconia disk using dual-curing resin cement. Shear bond strength tests were performed at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min after 24 hr distilled water storage. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's HSD tests. RESULTS: The means and standard deviations of shear bond strength values in the EYL, COL and CNT groups were 8.65 +/- 1.75, 12.12 +/- 3.02, and 5.97 +/- 1.14 MPa, respectively. Data showed that application of CO2 and Er:YAG lasers resulted in a significant higher shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramics (p < 0.0001). The highest bond strength was recorded in the COL group (p < 0.0001). In the CNT group all the failures were adhesive. However, in the laser groups, 80% of the failures were of the adhesive type. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment of zirconia ceramic via CO2 and Er:YAG laser improves the bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic, with higher bond strength values in the CO2 laser treated samples.
Adhesives
;
Ceramics*
;
Lasers, Gas
;
Resin Cements*
;
Water