1.Patient dissatisfaction following rhinoplasty:a 10‑year experience in Iran
Farhad GHORBANI ; Hanie AHMADI ; Ghazal DAVAR
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2023;45(1):7-
Background:
The nose is one of the most prominent parts of the face and plays a significant role in peoples’ selfsatisfaction as well as quality of life. Rhinoplasty is considered as one of the most numerous and delicate cosmetic surgeries all around the world that can be performed for functional issues, esthetic issues, or both. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the dissatisfaction of patients who had undergone rhinoplasty surgery and inform the surgeons to improve the surgical techniques to prevent probable future complaints.Method This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to report various aspects of dissatisfaction of patients following rhinoplasty. All available files in the Fars Forensic Medicine Department between 2011 and 2020 were reviewed, and the required information was extracted.
Results:
Out of 117 patients, 68.4% were females and 31.6% were males. Most of the patients were in the age range of 30–34 years. In terms of educational attainment, the highest frequency is associated with academically educated patients and the lowest with a diploma. The majority of cases filed for litigation less than 6 months after their rhinoplasty. The first rank among the factors of dissatisfaction with surgeries belonged to “respiratory problems” (36.8%) followed by “dissatisfaction with the general shape of the nose” (34.2%).
Conclusion
Our study shows that middle-aged female patients may be more difficult to satisfy. In general, at younger ages, patients complain about esthetics, and with aging, most patients feel dissatisfied with nasal function.
2.The effects of orthognathic surgery on auditory function
Farhad GHORBANI ; Hossein DANESTEH ; Afshin KHORAMNIA ; Saeid TAVANAFAR
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2021;43(1):11-
Background:
Orthognathic surgery is widely used in treating functional and skeletal problems. Any surgical procedure could cause side effects.
Objectives:
This study aimed to evaluate the potential changes in orthognathic surgery on the hearing function of patients.
Materials and methods:
Thirty-one orthognathic surgery candidates were recruited in this study. Patients underwent either single or double jaw surgery. Pure tone audiometry (PTA), tympanometry, and Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Test (ETFT) were performed postoperatively at 24 h, 6 weeks, and 6 months after surgery. Patients were tabulated based on the type of maxilla and mandibular surgical movements (vertical and horizontal).
Results:
PTA evaluation, based on horizontal or vertical movements, did not show significant differences, although vertical movements resulted in less change in hearing threshold. In other words, no significant changes occurred in patients’ hearing threshold after surgery. No significant difference was also observed between horizontal and vertical movements in the results of tympanometry. Negative changes were found in the results of ETFT in vertical movements, which returned to pre-surgery values in the final test.
Conclusions
The risk of minor changes in hearing function is probable during the first week after orthognathic surgery, but these negative changes will either totally fade or remain negligible. Patients gave informed consent preoperatively, and reassurance postoperatively is prudent.