Objective To analyze the experience of scientific research management in a Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) hospitals.Methods We systematically summarized the experience of existing practices and established a TCM scientific research delicacy management model including project process management,funds management,personnel evaluation,institutional construction and output transfer.Results The scientific research management model was suitable for the hospital development,in accordance with daily medical and teaching practice.Conclusions Scientific research ability had gradually become an important indicator of TCM hospital evaluation.This management model could provide reference for related issues.

Objective To explore the problems in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) scientific research project management and provide possible countermeasures.Methods Through cluster sampling,all the scientific research administrators and staff in a hospital were selected.A questionnaire about TCM hospital scientific research management was designed and used in our study.Results The majority of participants were basically satisfied with current scientific research management in TCM.Problems were analyzed including complex project application,singular evaluating standard,inflexible fund management,and backward professional concept.Conclusions The management of scientific research projects in TCM should combine professional characteristics,innovatively and comprehensively improve management concept,system,team and method.

Objective:To explore the countermeasures to strengthen hospital scientific research management and prevent research misconduct by studying the characteristics of research misconduct cases investigated by the NSFC in recent three years.Methods:Information of a total number of 67 research misconduct cases in 6 batches that publicly reported by the NSFC from 2019 to 2021 were collected, classified statistics were conducted on the situation of the supporting units involved, the specific issues of Misconduct and the disciplinary measures of the NSFC. According to the frequency proportion of misconduct problems, the tendency characteristics and reasons were analyzed and summarized, countermeasures and suggestions were put forward.Results:96.36% of the main responsibility entity of research misconduct was individuals, and 3.63% of the main responsibility of relying institution. There were 62 cases of research misconduct due to scientific papers and applications, accounted for 92.50%. Among the problematic papers involved, data fraud accounted for 48.20%, false signature or unauthorized signature accounted for 35.97%, plagiarism accounted for 32.37%, and unauthorized marking of other people′s fund number accounted for 27.33%. The NSFC revoked 55 fund projects involved and recovered funds, 67 people were disqualified from applying for projects with a maximum of 7 years and a minimum of 2 years, and 2 peer-review experts were punished.Conclusion:Hospital scientific research management should draw lessons from others, and put forward specific countermeasures from the aspects of strengthening scientific research integrity education, improving the construction of supervision mechanism, strictly implementing process management and perfecting scientific research credit evaluation system, in order to provide possible reference for preventing misconduct in hospital scientific research management practice.