1.What Do We Get from Recent Statin and CETP Inhibitors Trials?.
Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis 2018;7(1):12-20
Recent clinical trials and meta-analyses have indicated that high-intensive statin treatment lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and reduces the risk of nonfatal cardiovascular (CV) events compared with moderate-intensity statin treatment. However, there are residual risks of CV events and safety concerns associated with high-intensity statin treatment. The Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT) study showed that ezetimibe plus moderate-intensity statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes incrementally lowers LDL-C levels and improved CV outcomes compared with moderate-intensity statin therapy. However, despite the LDL-C-lowering effects, a substantial residual CV risk still remains, which includes other lipid abnormalities such as low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). The most representative agents that primarily increase HDL-C are cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors. Until now, 4 CETP inhibitors, including torcetrapib, dalcetrapib, evacetrapib, and anacetrapib, have been introduced and all have significantly raised the HDL-C from 30% to 133%. However, the results for CV outcomes in clinical trials differed, based on the 4 agents. Torcetrapib increased the risk of CV events and total mortality in patients at high CV risk (ILLUMINATE trial). Dalcetrapib and evacetrapib did not result in lower rate of CV events in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome and high risk vascular disease, respectively (dal-OUTCOMES and ACCELERATE trials). However, anacetrapib significantly decreased the incidence of major coronary events in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease (REVEAL trial). This topic summarizes the major results of recent statin and CETP inhibitor trials and provides framework to interpret and implement the trial results in real clinical practice.
Acute Coronary Syndrome
;
Cholesterol
;
Cholesterol Ester Transfer Proteins
;
Dyslipidemias
;
Ezetimibe
;
Ezetimibe, Simvastatin Drug Combination
;
Humans
;
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors*
;
Incidence
;
Lipoproteins
;
Mortality
;
Vascular Diseases
2.Change in cholesterol absorption and synthesis markers in patients with coronary heart disease after combination therapy with simvastatin plus ezetimibe.
Tao ZHANG ; Wen-feng WU ; Yang LIU ; Qi-hui WANG ; Lü-ya WANG ; Shu-hua MI
Chinese Medical Journal 2013;126(9):1618-1623
BACKGROUNDStatins and ezetimibe have been reported to change the balance of cholesterol metabolism, but few studies have been performed on Chinese patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in cholesterol metabolism markers in patients with coronary heart disease.
METHODSForty-five patients with coronary heart disease were treated with 20 mg/d of simvastatin for four weeks. Subjects were then divided into two different therapy groups according to whether they reached the target values for total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol level. Patients who reached the target values remained on simvastatin and those who did not reach the target values took a combination of simvastatin plus 10 mg/d ezetimibe until the 12th week. The concentrations of cholesterol synthesis markers (lathosterol and desmosterol) and absorption markers (campesterol and sitosterol) were measured on the 1st, 4th, and 12th week of the study by gas chromatography.
RESULTSAfter treatment with simvastatin for four weeks, the levels of total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased significantly compared to levels measured during the 1st week (P < 0.05). On the 12th week the levels of total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol had decreased significantly (P < 0.001) compared to levels during the 4th week. By the 12th week the levels of campesterol and sitosterol in the combination group had decreased significantly (P < 0.05) compared with levels measured during the 4th week.
CONCLUSIONSCoronary heart disease patients with high cholesterol synthesis at baseline might gain a greater benefit from simvastatin treatment. Combination therapy with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with low cholesterol synthesis at baseline might increase the success rate of lipid-lowering through decreasing the absorption of cholesterol.
Adult ; Aged ; Azetidines ; administration & dosage ; Cholesterol ; metabolism ; Cholesterol, LDL ; blood ; Coronary Disease ; drug therapy ; metabolism ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Ezetimibe ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Simvastatin ; administration & dosage
3.Effect of ezetimibe and simvastatin combination in Korean hypercholesterolemic patients.
Korean Journal of Medicine 2005;68(5):473-475
No abstract available.
Humans
;
Simvastatin*
;
Ezetimibe
4.Early Effects of Intensive Lipid-Lowering Treatment on Plaque Characteristics Assessed by Virtual Histology Intravascular Ultrasound.
Jung Hee LEE ; Dong Ho SHIN ; Byeong Keuk KIM ; Young Guk KO ; Donghoon CHOI ; Yangsoo JANG ; Myeong Ki HONG
Yonsei Medical Journal 2016;57(5):1087-1094
PURPOSE: The effects of short-term intensive lipid-lowering treatment on coronary plaque composition have not yet been sufficiently evaluated. We investigated the influence of short-term intensive lipid-lowering treatment on quantitative and qualitative changes in plaque components of non-culprit lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center trial. Seventy patients who underwent both baseline and three-month follow-up virtual histology intravascular ultrasound were randomly assigned to either an intensive lipid-lowering treatment group (ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg, n=34) or a control statin treatment group (pravastatin 20 mg, n=36). Using virtual histology intravascular ultrasound, plaque was characterized as fibrous, fibro-fatty, dense calcium, or necrotic core. Changes in plaque components during the three-month lipid-lowering treatment were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with the control statin treatment group, there was a significant reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the intensive lipid-lowering treatment group (-20.4±17.1 mg/dL vs. -36.8±17.4 mg/dL, respectively; p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in baseline, three-month follow-up, or serial changes of gray-scale intravascular ultrasound parameters between the two groups. The absolute volume of fibro-fatty plaque was significantly reduced in the intensive lipid-lowering treatment group compared with the control group (-1.5±3.4 mm3 vs. 0.8±4.7 mm3, respectively; p=0.024). A linear correlation was found between changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and changes in the absolute volumes of fibro-fatty plaque (p<0.001, R2=0.209). CONCLUSION: Modification of coronary plaque may be attainable after only three months of intensive lipid-lowering treatment.
Aged
;
Cholesterol, LDL/*blood/drug effects
;
Coronary Artery Disease/*diagnostic imaging
;
Drug Administration Schedule
;
Ezetimibe, Simvastatin Drug Combination/*administration & dosage
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/*administration & dosage
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Plaque, Atherosclerotic/*diagnostic imaging
;
Pravastatin/administration & dosage
;
Prospective Studies
;
Time Factors
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Ultrasonography, Interventional
5.Statin and Ezetimibe Combination Therapy Decreases Mean Platelet Volume Compared to Statin Monotherapy.
Jun beom LEE ; Gyeong Seon KIM ; Han na CHO
Journal of Stroke 2017;19(1):109-110
No abstract available.
Ezetimibe*
;
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors*
;
Mean Platelet Volume*
6.Response: Comparison of the Efficacy of Rosuvastatin Monotherapy 20 mg with Rosuvastatin 5 mg and Ezetimibe 10 mg Combination Therapy on Lipid Parameters in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (Diabetes Metab J 2019;43:582–9)
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2019;43(6):915-916
No abstract available.
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
;
Ezetimibe
;
Humans
;
Rosuvastatin Calcium
7.Letter: Comparison of the Efficacy of Rosuvastatin Monotherapy 20 mg with Rosuvastatin 5 mg and Ezetimibe 10 mg Combination Therapy on Lipid Parameters in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (Diabetes Metab J 2019;43:582–9)
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2019;43(6):909-910
No abstract available.
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
;
Ezetimibe
;
Humans
;
Rosuvastatin Calcium
8.Combination pharmacotherapy in lipid management.
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2015;58(8):745-749
Latest guidelines on lipid management recommend statins as the first-line therapy. Because limited evidence is available on cardiovascular outcomes with varying statin-nonstatin combinations, recommendation levels for these regimens have been weak. However, a recent trial has demonstrated the additive effect of the statin-ezetimibe combination. The statin-fibrate combination has shown an effect in certain subgroups and on diabetic microangiopathy. Recent trials using the statin-niacin combination have been largely negative, whereas the statin-omega-3 fatty acids combination demonstrated a positive effect only in one study. Identifying the benefits and limitations of each combination is important for the best possible management of patients.
Diabetic Angiopathies
;
Drug Therapy*
;
Ezetimibe
;
Fatty Acids
;
Fibric Acids
;
Humans
;
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
;
Niacin
10.Simvastatin/Ezetimibe Therapy for Recalcitrant Alopecia Areata: An Open Prospective Study of 14 Patients.
Joong Woon CHOI ; Dong Woo SUH ; Bark Lynn LEW ; Woo Young SIM
Annals of Dermatology 2017;29(6):755-760
BACKGROUND: Simvastatin belongs to the statin family, whose members have immunomodulatory activities. Ezetimibe have synergetic effects when co-administered with simvastatin. In several case reports, alopecia totalis and alopecia universalis were successfully treated with simvastatin/ezetimibe, suggesting that this combination could be a new efficient therapy for recalcitrant alopecia areata (AA). OBJECTIVE: To verify the efficacy of the simvastatin/ezetimibe combination therapy for recalcitrant AA and investigate the relationship between various treatment responses and prognostic factors. METHODS: This prospective open study was performed in patients with recalcitrant AA with the bald surface exceeding 75%. All patients took simvastatin (40 mg) and ezetimibe (10 mg) daily. The extent of hair regrowth expressed as percentage of the bald area was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the therapy. RESULTS: Of 14 enrolled patients, 4 patients (28.6%) were judged as responders showing regrowth of 30% to 80% after 3 months of treatment. The mean age of onset in non-responders was significantly lower than in responders. The total score of prognostic factors, calculated as a sum of factors related to poor prognosis, was much lower in responders than in non-responders. CONCLUSION: The remission rate in this study was unsatisfactory. However, since the recruited patients had not responded to any other treatments for AA, simvastatin/ezetimibe can still be considered as an alternative treatment for recalcitrant AA. The total scores of the prognostic factors were statistically different between responders and non-responders. These results can be used to predict the outcome of treatment with simvastatin/ezetimibe and anticipate prognosis.
Age of Onset
;
Alopecia Areata*
;
Alopecia*
;
Ezetimibe
;
Hair
;
Humans
;
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
;
Prognosis
;
Prospective Studies*
;
Simvastatin