OBJECTIVETo investigate the clinical effects of facemask protraction on skeletal Class III adult patients.

METHODSTotally 15 skeletal Class III patients (male 7, female 8, aged 18 - 24 years) were included in the study. Removable and fixed appliances were used in the upper or lower arches. Facemask protraction was used at night for about 7 months and Class III elastics were worn during the day. The total treatment time was 24 mouths on average. Cephalometric analysis was carried out before and after treatment.

RESULTSThe profile was greatly improved and Class I molar relationship was achieved. SNA angle was increased from (79.6 ± 3.7)° to (81.1 ± 3.8)°. SNB angle was decreased from (83.5 ± 3.3)° to (82.6 ± 3.6)°. ANB angle was increased from (-4.1 ± 2.0)° to (-1.5 ± 1.8)°.

CONCLUSIONSProtraction was effective in the treatment of skeletal Class III adult patients.

Adolescent ; Cephalometry ; Extraoral Traction Appliances ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Malocclusion, Angle Class III ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the soft profile and hard tissue changes after maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage implant in treatment of Class III malocclusion during growth period.

METHODS18 patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion were treated with maxillary protraction for about 9 months, (3.5 +/- 0.1) N, with skeletal anchorage implant and face mask. Cephalometric records were analyzed to assess the changes of maxillo-facial structure of the hard and soft tissue before and after treatment.

RESULTSAll patients' Class III profiles were corrected. Maxillary growth increased, chin clockwise rotated, facial convexity angle increased, lower lip protrusion decreased. Facial vertical height ratio, nasolabial angle, upper lip protrusion and mentolabial sulcus changed unconspicuously. Upper incisors kept in sites, lower incisor upright, maxilla moved forwards. SNA, ANB significantly increased. SNB decreased and the mandible clockwise rotated.

CONCLUSIONThe maxilla is effectively protracted without significant rotation by using skeletal anchorage implant. The undesired effects of conventional protraction therapies, such as labial tilt of upper anterior teeth and extrusion of the maxillary molars, are reduced or eliminated with skeletal anchorage implant. These effects can conspicuously correct profiles of the patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion, make the profile more harmonious and aesthetic.

Cephalometry ; Chin ; Extraoral Traction Appliances ; Face ; Humans ; Incisor ; Lip ; Malocclusion, Angle Class III ; Mandible ; Maxilla ; Molar

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of bone anchorage and maxillary facemask protraction devices in treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion in adolescents. METHODS: Articles relating to the use of bone anchorage and maxillary facemask protraction devices for treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion in adolescents were searched from the databases of Cochrane Library, PubMed, EmBase, CNKI, and Wanfang database. Several inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed for the article screening. The clinical data were extracted, and the quality of the selected articles was evaluated. A Meta-analysis of SNA, SNB, ANB, ANS-Me, Wits, and U1-PP change was performed by using RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: Seven studies (264 patients) were included in the Meta-analysis. Among these studies, three were randomized controlled trials, and four were non-randomized controlled trials. Compared with the maxillary facemask protraction device group, the bone ancho-rage device group had higher SNA changes and lower ANS-Me, Wits, and U1-PP changes (P<0.05). No significant differences were observed in the SNB and ANB changes between these two groups. CONCLUSIONS Compared with the maxillary facemask protraction device, the bone anchorage device can increase the extent of protraction of the maxilla and has better controls for the labial inclination of the maxillary anterior teeth in treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion among adolescents. However, additional high-quality randomized controlled trials must be performed to verify the results.
Adolescent ; Cephalometry ; Extraoral Traction Appliances ; Humans ; Malocclusion, Angle Class III ; Maxilla ; Palatal Expansion Technique

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the effectiveness of treatment with maxillary protraction with or without rapid palatal expansion (RPE) for skeletal Class III malocclusion in mixed dentition.

METHODSA total of 31 children with Class III malocclusion in mixed dentition were selected, and 15 (group A) received maxillary protraction treatment with RPE, the other 16 (group B) received maxillary protraction without RPE. Cephalometric films were taken before and after treatment, and traditional and Pancherz analysis were used.

RESULTSThe average duration of treatment was 10.14 months in group A and 9.77 months in group B respectively (P>0.05). According to Pancherz analysis, maxillary basal bone moved forwards by 2.99 mm in group A and 3.33 mm in group B respectively (P>0.05), mandibular basal bone moved backwards by 0.07 mm in group A, while forwards by 0.80 mm in group B (P>0.05), the overjet increased by 4.51 mm in group A and 6.37 mm in group B respectively (P<0.05), and the molar relationship improved by 4.97 mm in group A and 4.73 mm in group B respectively (P>0.05). The effects were clinically satisfactory in the both groups. Lower molar moved forwards by 1.18 mm in basal bone in group A, while backwards by 1.20 mm in group B (P<0.05). Traditional cephalometric analysis showed no statistic differences between the two groups except that upper incisior showed greater procline in group B than in group A (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONThe study shows that maxillary protraction treatment, with or without RPE, is clinically satisfactory to correct early skeletal Class III malocclusion.

Cephalometry ; Child ; Extraoral Traction Appliances ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Malocclusion, Angle Class III ; Mandible ; Maxilla ; Molar ; Palatal Expansion Technique

OBJECTIVEThe skeletal Class III malocclusion often occurs in ethnic Asia population, and it is difficult to obtain an ideal results if only treated with protraction headgear (PH). However, the combined rapid palatal expansion (RPE), Edgewise Technique and PH can reach it, so the authors investigated the methods and characteristics of combined RPE, Edgewise Technique and PH in the treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion.

METHODSFifteen patients, aged 8.5-12 years, including six males and 9 females, with skeletal Class III malocclusion and maxillary retrusion were selected for this study. Radiographs of left hand and wrist showed that all patients were at the pre-pubertal stage. The duration of treatment was nine months on average.

RESULTSThe SNA and A-ptm increased with a mean of cephalometric analysis, which showed significant difference (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONObvious skeletal and profile changes can be achieved with combined RPE, Edgewise Technique and PH in the treatment of early skeletal Class III malocclusion.

Child ; Extraoral Traction Appliances ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Malocclusion, Angle Class III ; therapy ; Orthodontics, Corrective ; instrumentation ; methods ; Palatal Expansion Technique

OBJECTIVERetention elements were added in the removable reverse headgear appliances in order to achieve better treatment effects of skeletal Class III malocclusion.

METHODSEighteen patients who needed treatments with reverse headgear appliances were randomly and equally divided into two groups with traditional type of retention elements (T group) and modified type of retention elements (M group) respectively. For the modified type appliances, an adams clasp was added in the position of central incisors on the basis of the traditional type. The minimum dislocating force for both types was measured with the same forcemeter in the first and second visit, respectively. The occurrence of dislocation caused by traction was recorded during the visits of the first three months.

RESULTSThe M group showed significantly greater retention than the T group. The minimum dislocating force for M group was larger in the first and second visit (P<0.01, P<0.001). Furthermore, during the first three months, two times of dislocation occurred in M group while it was nine times for T group, indicating great difference in retention (P< 0.05).

CONCLUSIONAdding an adams clasp in the position of upper central incisors could effectively prevent the downward dislocation of the appliance when traction force was applied. Accordingly, the therapeutic efficacy was greatly improved.

Extraoral Traction Appliances ; Female ; Humans ; Incisor ; Male ; Malocclusion, Angle Class II ; Malocclusion, Angle Class III ; Tooth ; Tooth Movement Techniques

OBJECTIVETo investigate the effects of maxillary protraction combined with repetitive rapid palatal expansions and constrictions (RPE/C) vs. rapid palatal expansion (RPE) alone using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

METHODSTwenty four subjects with maxillary retrusion were recruited and block randomized into either the control group (n = 12) or the RPE/C (n = 12) group.

CONTROL GROUPfacemask protraction after RPE. RPE/C group: facemask protraction after RPE/C. 3D reconstruction, landmarks identifying, superimposition and cephalometric analysis were performed to compare the pre-treatment and post- treatment CBCT images.

RESULTSOne subject in the RPE/C group was lost to follow up during the treatment. Maxilla moved forward [(2.5±1.0) mm] after maxillary protraction with RPE/C, which was significantly greater than that in the control group [(1.6±0.8) mm] (P < 0.05). The distance of basion to subspinale (Ba-A) increased [(3.1±1.0) mm] in the RPE/C group, which was significantly greater than that in the control group [(2.2 ± 0.9) mm] (P < 0.05). The amount of forward movement of upper first molars was significantly greater in the RPE/C group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSMaxillary protraction with RPE/C might positively affect the forward movement of maxilla compared with the RPE alone protocol with the early treatment of maxillary retrusion patients.

Cephalometry ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Constriction ; Extraoral Traction Appliances ; Humans ; Malocclusion, Angle Class III ; therapy ; Maxilla ; Molar ; Palatal Expansion Technique

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the dentofacial effects of conventional and modified facemask therapies with rapid maxillary expansion, in a group of Class III patients; and compared with an untreated control group. METHODS: The conventional facemask group (Group 1) comprised of 24 patients, 13 girls and 11 boys (mean age, 9.2 +/- 1.4 years); the modified facemask treatment group (Group 2) comprised of 24 patients, 12 girls and 12 boys (mean age, 9.3 +/- 1.6 years); and the control group (Group 3) comprised of 21 subjects, 11 girls and 10 boys (mean age, 9.8 +/- 1.9 years). Treatment and control changes within the groups and the differences between the groups were analyzed statistically. Intra-group comparisons were evaluated using the non-parametric Wilcoxon's test and intergroup changes were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The statistical significance of intergroup differences was further assessed with the Mann-Whitney test for independent samples and applying Bonferroni's correction (p < 0.016). RESULTS: In group 1, SNB changes were less than the control. There were increases in SNA, ANB, SN-MP, A to N perp and Upper lip to E plane. In group 2, SNB, U1-NA (mm) U1-NA (degrees) and Pog to N perp (mm) changes were less than the control. There were increases in SNA, ANB, SN-MP, A to N perp and Upper lip to E plane. CONCLUSIONS: Modified facemask appliance can be used effectively in Class III patients with a retrognathic maxilla. Facemask therapies with expansion resulted in an anterior advancement and translation of maxilla without rotation; and the mandible moved downward and backward in both treatment groups.
Cephalometry ; Extraoral Traction Appliances ; Humans ; Lip ; Malocclusion ; Malocclusion, Angle Class III ; Mandible ; Maxilla ; Palatal Expansion Technique ; Prospective Studies

OBJECTIVESkeletal and dental changes during treatment and six months post-treatment with the headgear-Herbst appliance were evaluated quantitatively.

METHODSThe sample comprised of 22 treated patients and 31 controls. Lateral cephalograms were obtained at start, after 6 months and end of active treatment, and after 6 months of retention.

RESULTSThe restraint effect on the maxilla was significant in both initial and late phases, the enhanced growth of the mandible was significant during the initial phase only, while there was effect of reduced increase in lower facial height during the late phase only. During retention period the jaw base relationship was maintained and the effect on the lower facial height was reinforced.

CONCLUSIONThe Headgear Herbst was effective orthopedic devise.

Adolescent ; Child ; Extraoral Traction Appliances ; Humans ; Malocclusion, Angle Class II ; therapy ; Mandibular Advancement ; methods ; Orthodontic Appliances, Functional ; Prospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

Child ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous ; Extraoral Traction Appliances ; Humans ; Male ; Malocclusion, Angle Class III ; therapy ; Maxilla ; abnormalities ; Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures ; instrumentation ; Orthodontic Appliance Design ; Orthodontics, Corrective ; instrumentation