No abstract available.
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory*

No abstract available.
Evoked Potentials ; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory* ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate frontal N30 status in Parkinson's disease (PD) and to examine the correlation between the amplitude of frontal N30 and the severity of motor deficits. METHODS: The frontal N30 was compared between 17 PD patients and 18 healthy volunteers. Correlations between the amplitude of frontal N30 and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score of the more severely affected side was examined. RESULTS: The mean latency of the N30 was not significantly different between patients and healthy volunteers (p = 0.981), but the mean amplitude was lower in PD patients (p < 0.025). There was a significant negative correlation between the amplitude of N30 and the UPDRS motor score (r = -0.715, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: The frontal N30 status indicates the motor severity of PD. It can be a useful biomarker reflecting dopaminergic deficits and an objective measurement for monitoring the clinical severity of PD.
Evoked Potentials ; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory* ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Parkinson Disease*

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study is to evaluate the success rate and feasibility of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) focusing on transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring for patients with preoperative motor weakness in spine surgery. METHODS: Between November 2011 and December 2013, TcMEP and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring were attempted in 130 consecutive patients undergoing spine surgeries for cervical or thoracic cord lesions. Patients ranged in age from 14 to 81 years (mean±standard deviation, 56.7±14.8 years), and 84 patients were male. The success rates of both SSEP and MEPs monitoring were assessed according to the preoperative Medical Research Council (MRC) and Nurick grades. RESULTS: TcMEP was recorded successfully in 0%, 28.6%, 72.3%, and 100% of patients with MRC grades 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. SSEP was obtained from 0%, 37.5%, 21.5%, 61.4%, and 85.4% of patients with MRC grades 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. TcMEP was recorded successfully in 84% of patients with Nurick grades 1-3 and 26% of patients with Nurick grades 4-5. SSEPs were recorded successfully in 76.3% of patients with Nurick grades 1-3 and 24% of patients with grades 4-5. CONCLUSION: IONM during spine surgery may be useless in patients with MRC grades 1-2, applicable MRC grade 3, and useful MRC grades 4-5. MRC grade 3 is a critical point of indication for application of MEPs. In unmonitorable cases with MRC grade 3, increasing stimulus intensity or facilitation techniques may be considered to improve the usefulness of TcMEP.
Evoked Potentials, Motor ; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory ; Humans ; Male ; Spine*

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the somatosensory findings of pusher syndrome in stroke patients. METHODS: Twelve pusher patients and twelve non-pusher patients were enrolled in this study. Inclusion criteria were unilateral stroke, sufficient cognitive abilities to understand and follow instructions, and no visual problem. Patients were evaluated for pusher syndrome using a standardized scale for contraversive pushing. Somatosensory finding was assessed by the Cumulative Somatosensory Impairment Index (CSII) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) at 1 and 14 weeks after the stroke onset. Data of SEPs with median and tibial nerve stimulation were classified into the normal, abnormal, and no response group. RESULTS: In the baseline characteristics (sex, lesion character, and side) of both groups, significant differences were not found. The score of CSII decreased in both groups at 14 weeks (p<0.05), but there were no significant differences in the CSII scores between the two groups at 1 and 14 weeks. There were no significant differences in SEPs between the two groups at 1 and 14 weeks after the stroke onset. CONCLUSION: It appears that somatosensory input plays a relatively minor role in pusher syndrome. Further study will be required to reveal the mechanism of pusher syndrome.
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory ; Humans ; Stroke ; Tibial Nerve

To determine the normal median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials in cat and to evaluate the effect of temperature change, following experiment was done. Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials(MNSEP) were recorded in 45 mongrel cats at 38.5 degrees C, the normal temperature range in cats, and in 8 cats of them MNSEP was recorded at 37.5 degrees C, 36.5 degrees C and 35.5 degrees C additionally. The results were as follows ; 1) Seven peak waves were always recorded and they were named as I, II, P1, III, N1, P2, N2, and central conduction time(CCT) was thought as I-N1 interpeak latency and it was 5.81+/-0.53msec. 2) The peak latencies of all waves and CCT were increased gradually as temperature decreased. The latencies of the late waves increased more than those of early waves as temperature decreased except N2.
Animals ; Cats* ; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory* ; Median Nerve*

Somatosensory evoked potentials(SEPs) has been an important part of electrodiagnosis and has been utilized as a clinical diagnostic technique in various neurological disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of SEPs in the analysis of sensory deficit as an objective method. The test was performed on the two groups of patients with cerebrovascular disease associated with motor and sensory impairment (grouip A) and pure motor impairment (group B), and then the results are compared with that of normal age-matched group. The results are as follows: 1. There is no significant difference in the abnormalities of N9 and N14 component between group A and B (P>0.05). 2. There is no significant difference in the decreased amplitude of N20 component (P>0.05), but there is a significant difference in the delayed peak latency or absent wave of N20 component(P<0.01) between group A and B. 3. There is a significant difference in the increased central conduction time between group A and B (P<0.01). 4. Although the difference is not significant statistically, there are more abnormalities of N20 or central conduction time in the intact hemispheres in group A than group B after stimulation of the median nerves of the affected sides.
Electrodiagnosis ; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory* ; Humans ; Median Nerve

No abstract available.
Erectile Dysfunction* ; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory* ; Male

No abstract available.
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory* ; Spinal Stenosis* ; Spine*

No abstract available.
Cerebral Palsy* ; Child* ; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory* ; Humans