1.Singnificance of Evoked Potential.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 1989;22(2):169-173
No abstract available.
Evoked Potentials*
2.Studies on Clinical Application of Congnitive Evoked Potentials.
Journal of the Korean Neurological Association 1988;6(1):1-8
No abstract available.
Evoked Potentials*
3.Characteristics of Trigeminal Evoked Potential and It's Pathway in the Rat.
Se Hyuk KIM ; Chun Zhi ZHAO ; Oh Kyoo KWON ; Bae Hwan LEE ; Yong Gou PARK ; Sang Sup CHUNG
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2000;29(8):985-994
No abstract available.
Animals
;
Evoked Potentials*
;
Rats*
4.Effects of Plateau Time on Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (cVEMP) elicited by 500-Hz Tone Burst
Vijay Marimuthu ; Mohd Fairul Syafiq Harun
Malaysian Journal of Health Sciences 2016;14(1):31-36
Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (cVEMP) is a routine vestibular test which checks the integrity of
vestibulocollic reflex (VCR) pathway. Clinically, 500-Hz tone burst is widely used stimulus to evoke a cVEMP. Although
several studies have suggested different plateau times (PT) for eliciting cVEMPs, but not many have reported the optimal
PT for evoking cVEMP using 500 Hz tone burst stimuli. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effect of
PT on cVEMPs elicited by 500 Hz tone burst at 95 dBnHL using four different PT (0, 2, 4 and 10 ms). Thirty healthy
adults with normal hearing and vestibular systems participated in this study. Results revealed that the P1 latency was
significantly longer for PT 10 ms compared to other PTs. N1 latency was significantly prolonged for long PT of 10 ms
compared to PT 2 ms. P2 latency showed no significant differences among PTs. The P1-N1 inter-amplitude values
however revealed no significant difference across all PTs. It was found that the P1-N1 inter-amplitude was severely
affected after 4 ms of PT. This study concluded that the PT of either 0 or 2 ms yielded the most robust cVEMP.
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials
5.Motor evoked potential in stroke.
Min Joung KANG ; Tae Sik YOON ; Chang Il PARK ; Sae Il CHUN
Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 1993;17(1):26-35
No abstract available.
Evoked Potentials, Motor*
;
Stroke*
6.Considerations in measuring somatosensory evoked potential.
Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 1993;17(2):151-156
No abstract available.
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory*
7.Motor evoked potentials in hemiparesis by magnetic stimulation.
In Sung LEE ; Hee Sang KIM ; Kyung Hoi AHN
Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 1992;16(1):35-41
No abstract available.
Evoked Potentials, Motor*
;
Paresis*
8.Motor evoked potential in bulbocavernosus muscle using magnetic stimulation.
Seoung Woong KANG ; Joo Sup KIM ; Jae Hyung SA ; Jae Ho MOON
Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 1993;17(3):341-347
No abstract available.
Evoked Potentials, Motor*
10.The Applicability of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Patients with Preoperative Motor Weakness during Spine Surgery.
Jae Meen LEE ; Dong Hwan KIM ; Hwan Soo KIM ; Byung Kwan CHOI ; In Ho HAN
Korean Journal of Spine 2016;13(1):9-12
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study is to evaluate the success rate and feasibility of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) focusing on transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring for patients with preoperative motor weakness in spine surgery. METHODS: Between November 2011 and December 2013, TcMEP and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring were attempted in 130 consecutive patients undergoing spine surgeries for cervical or thoracic cord lesions. Patients ranged in age from 14 to 81 years (mean±standard deviation, 56.7±14.8 years), and 84 patients were male. The success rates of both SSEP and MEPs monitoring were assessed according to the preoperative Medical Research Council (MRC) and Nurick grades. RESULTS: TcMEP was recorded successfully in 0%, 28.6%, 72.3%, and 100% of patients with MRC grades 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. SSEP was obtained from 0%, 37.5%, 21.5%, 61.4%, and 85.4% of patients with MRC grades 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. TcMEP was recorded successfully in 84% of patients with Nurick grades 1-3 and 26% of patients with Nurick grades 4-5. SSEPs were recorded successfully in 76.3% of patients with Nurick grades 1-3 and 24% of patients with grades 4-5. CONCLUSION: IONM during spine surgery may be useless in patients with MRC grades 1-2, applicable MRC grade 3, and useful MRC grades 4-5. MRC grade 3 is a critical point of indication for application of MEPs. In unmonitorable cases with MRC grade 3, increasing stimulus intensity or facilitation techniques may be considered to improve the usefulness of TcMEP.
Evoked Potentials, Motor
;
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Spine*