1.Educational strategies for teaching evidence-based practice to undergraduate health students: systematic review.
Konstantinos KYRIAKOULIS ; Athina PATELAROU ; Aggelos LALIOTIS ; Andrew C WAN ; Michail MATALLIOTAKIS ; Chrysoula TSIOU ; Evridiki PATELAROU
Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions 2016;13(1):34-
PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to find best teaching strategies for teaching evidence-based practice (EBP) to undergraduate health students that have been adopted over the last years in healthcare institutions worldwide. METHODS: The authors carried out a systematic, comprehensive bibliographic search using Medline database for the years 2005 to March 2015 (updated in March 2016). Search terms used were chosen from the USNLM Institutes of Health list of MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) and free text key terms were used as well. Selected articles were measured based on the inclusion criteria of this study and initially compared in terms of titles or abstracts. Finally, articles relevant to the subject of this review were retrieved in full text. Critical appraisal was done to determine the effects of strategy of teaching evidence-based medicine (EBM). RESULTS: Twenty articles were included in the review. The majority of the studies sampled medical students (n=13) and only few conducted among nursing (n=2), pharmacy (n=2), physiotherapy/therapy (n=1), dentistry (n=1), or mixed disciplines (n=1) students. Studies evaluated a variety of educational interventions of varying duration, frequency and format (lectures, tutorials, workshops, conferences, journal clubs, and online sessions), or combination of these to teach EBP. We categorized interventions into single interventions covering a workshop, conference, lecture, journal club, or e-learning and multifaceted interventions where a combination of strategies had been assessed. Seven studies reported an overall increase to all EBP domains indicating a higher EBP competence and two studies focused on the searching databases skill. CONCLUSION: Followings were deduced from above analysis: multifaceted approach may be best suited when teaching EBM to health students; the use of technology to promote EBP through mobile devices, simulation, and the web is on the rise; and the duration of the interventions varying form some hours to even months was not related to the students' EBP competence.
Academies and Institutes
;
Congresses as Topic
;
Delivery of Health Care
;
Dentistry
;
Education
;
Educational Measurement
;
Evidence-Based Medicine
;
Evidence-Based Practice*
;
Health Occupations
;
Humans
;
Mental Competency
;
Nursing
;
Pharmacy
;
Students, Medical
2.Introduction to evidence-based family practice
Noel L. Espallardo ; Nicolas R. Gordo Jr
The Filipino Family Physician 2022;60(1):2-4
While the definition of EBM can be straightforward in other medical field, family and community medicine practitioners take on very different roles in different health systems. Despite the challenges presented, EBM is still necessary in family and community practice. Family and community medicine practitioners must be able to obtain, assess, apply and integrate new knowledge based on available evidence throughout their professional life. From the definition of EBM and the nature of family practice described previously, we propose to define “Evidence-based Family Practice as the conscientious and judicious use of the current, relevant, applicable and best available evidence in making shared clinical decisions for patient care. Such decisions must account for the capacity and setting of the family practitioner and patient preference”. The proposed steps are: 1) Framing the Clinical Problem, 2) Searching for the Evidence, 3) Critical Appraisal, 4) Informing the Patient About the Evidence, 5) Shared Decision Making, and 6) Evaluation of the Decision.
Evidence-Based Medicine
;
Evidence-Based Practice
4.How to understand and conduct evidence-based medicine.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2016;69(5):435-445
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions regarding the care of individual patients. This concept has gained popularity recently, and its applications have been steadily expanding. Nowadays, the term "evidence-based" is used in numerous situations and conditions, such as evidence-based medicine, evidence-based practice, evidence-based health care, evidence-based social work, evidence-based policy, and evidence-based education. However, many anesthesiologists and their colleagues have not previously been accustomed to utilizing EBM, and they have experienced difficulty in understanding and applying the techniques of EBM to their practice. In this article, the author discusses the brief history, definition, methods, and limitations of EBM. As EBM also involves making use of the best available information to answer questions in clinical practice, the author emphasizes the process of performing evidence-based medicine: generate the clinical question, find the best evidence, perform critical appraisal, apply the evidence, and then evaluate. Levels of evidence and strength of recommendation were also explained. The author expects that this article may be of assistance to readers in understanding, conducting, and evaluating EBM.
Education
;
Evidence-Based Medicine*
;
Evidence-Based Practice
;
Humans
;
Social Work
6.Assessing the degree of evidence based therapeutic intervention in a university based family medicine outpatient clinic.
Chang Li TANG ; Dung Hyun MOON ; Myoung Ho HONG ; Kyung Hwan CHO ; Youn Seon CHOI ; Do Kyung YOON ; Jeong A KIM ; Young Mee LEE ; June Young LEE
Journal of the Korean Academy of Family Medicine 2002;23(1):40-59
BACKGROUND: Despite the development of medical knowledge and technology, it has long been pointed out that the treatment guidelines are not sufficiently based on evidence. It has not been yet studied how evidence based medicine is implemented when physicians make their therapeutic decision. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of evidence based interventions in a university based family medicine outpatient clinic. METHODS: The degree of evidence based practice was evaluated using Ellis and Gills' method developed by the Evidence - Based Medicine Center in Oxford. The Patients' records of an outpatient clinic of a university hospital were reviewed on the primary diagnosis - intervention. The evidence based guidelines were defined as traditional textbooks and the results of randomized controlled trials found on databases such as Medicine, Clinical evidence, Best evidence, and Cochrane. ln case where there were no guidelines, consultation with the specialists was done. The degree of the evidence based therapeutic interventions was assessed by three levels. RESULTS: There were 179 primary diagnosis - intervention pairs, among them, 125 pairs (69.8%) of interventions were based on randomized controlled trial evidence and 19 pairs (10.6%) based on convincing non-experimental evidence. No evidence was found for 35 pairs (19.6%) . As a result, 80.4% of the total 144 pairs were regarded as evidence - based medicine. CONCLUSIONS: The result showed that considerable portion of the total cases were evaluated as based on clinical evidence, which is similar to the conclusions of the previous studies in other countries. We hope that future similar studies will be conducted in other institutions as well as in other specialities.
Ambulatory Care Facilities*
;
Clinical Medicine
;
Diagnosis
;
Evidence-Based Medicine
;
Evidence-Based Practice
;
Hope
;
Humans
;
Outpatients*
;
Specialization
7.Hospital Nurses' Uses of Evidence, and Barriers to and Enablers of Evidenced-based Practice.
Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration 2013;19(2):292-303
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore nurses' experience of evidence-based nursing practice in general hospitals. METHODS: Data were collected from 13 nurses through in-depth interviews about their experiences with evidence-based practice. The research questions were "What kind of evidence are you using in your practice?" and "What are the barriers to and enablers of evidence-based practice that you have experienced?" Qualitative data from field and transcribed notes were analyzed using qualitative content analysis methodology. RESULTS: Major themes of using evidence were identified as 'research as primary valid evidence', 'information from local context and internet as realistic evidence', and 'clinical experience as pragmatic evidence'. Patient experience was not used as evidence in solving nursing problems. Barriers to and enablers of evidence-based practice were linked. They included both external, organizational factors and individual factors. Main issues were 'lack of evidence and poor work environment', and major facilitating factors were 'improving knowledge and skills related to evidence-based practice' and 'communicating and sharing evidence'. CONCLUSION: The study findings provide useful information for understanding nurses' experience of using external and internal evidence along with their meaning. A multidimensional approach is needed to overcome barriers to and implement evidence-based practice.
Evidence-Based Nursing
;
Evidence-Based Practice
;
Humans
;
Internet
8.Application of Evidence-Based Practice in Surgery: Clinical Practice Guideline for the Breast Cancer.
Journal of the Korean Society for Vascular Surgery 2003;19(2):207-211
Many physicians and health care providers have to make a remarkable portion of their medical decisions without any scientific evidence. Nowadays, an enormous amount of medical information is being published almost every day, even while the value of this information is steadily decreasing. Medical practitioners, however, don't have enough time to maintain up-to-date medical knowledge because of their heavy schedule. For this reason, a number of projects in many countries have faced these problems and pushed the development of evidence-based medicine and clinical practice guidelines. This new paradigm integrates multiple sources of information and focuses attention on patient outcomes and preferences. The Korean breast cancer society presented the clinical practice guideline for the management of breast cancer in November 2002. The purpose of this paper is to introduce this case and to discuss the points at issue as well as its application and validity.
Appointments and Schedules
;
Breast Neoplasms*
;
Breast*
;
Evidence-Based Medicine
;
Evidence-Based Practice*
;
Health Personnel
;
Humans
9.AGREE-based evaluation and content analysis of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for acupuncture-moxibustion.
Li-Hua GUO ; Yuan MA ; Xiao-Dong WU
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion 2019;39(11):1223-1228
OBJECTIVE:
To carry out the methodological quality evaluation and content analysis of the evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for acupuncture-moxibustion in China, and to provide reference for the development and updating of future guidelines.
METHODS:
With Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and EvaluationⅡ(AGREEⅡ), 20 evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for acupuncture and moxibustion in China were evaluated from six aspects: scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, clarity of presentation, applicability and editorial independence. In addition, the contents of 20 guidelines were systematically analyzed, and the characteristics of guidelines were summarized from the aspects of disease selection, operation technology type and safety.
RESULTS:
The scores of six domains were scope and purpose (91.1%), stakeholder involvement (68.5%), rigour of development (68.6%), clarity of presentation (90.3%), applicability (34.5%) and editorial independence (16.7%). The recommendations of the 20 acupuncture guidelines covered common clinical problems such as diagnosis, treatment and precautions, which were in line with the clinical characteristics of acupuncture and moxibustion in terms of content structure.
CONCLUSION
The methodology of the evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for acupuncture and moxibustion in China conformed to the requirements of AGREEⅡ on the quality evaluation, and the overall quality was moderate, but the aspects of applicability and editorial independence were still needed to be improved. The contents of recommendations in 20 guidelines were specific and clear, in line with the characteristics of acupuncture and moxibustion, presenting clinical reference value. In the future, in the process of guideline development, the method of developing acupuncture and moxibustion guidelines should be constantly improved to improve the quality of the guidelines; in the meantime, more attention should be paid to the generalization and clinical applicability evaluation.
Acupuncture Therapy
;
China
;
Evidence-Based Medicine
;
Evidence-Based Practice
;
Humans
;
Moxibustion
10.Development and Quality Evaluation of Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines of Chinese Medicine.
Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine 2016;36(1):11-15
More attentions have been paid to the development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (ECPGs) of Chinese medicine (CM). International guideline evaluation instruments such as Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE I) has been gradually applied in ECPGs quality evaluation of CM. Nowadays, there are some certain methodological defects in partial ECPGs of Chinese medicine, with relatively low applicability and slowly update. It is suggested to establish technical specifications of CM-ECPGs in accordance with the characteristics of CM and international general specification, strengthen the quality evaluation of CM-ECPGs, attach great importance to the regularly update as well as popularization and application of CM-ECPGs.
Evidence-Based Medicine
;
Humans
;
Medicine, Chinese Traditional
;
Practice Guidelines as Topic