Symptomatic urolithiasis is a common cause of emergency department visits, with noncontrast computed tomography considered the imaging gold standard. According to current guidelines, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is limited to the evaluation of hydronephrosis as a secondary sign of acute ureteral stones. However, the use of POCUS to detect ureteral stones may lead to decreased radiation to the patient and a more rapid diagnosis. This case series describes 10 patients with suspected symptomatic urolithiasis who were diagnosed accurately by emergency physicians using POCUS to detect obstructive ureteral stones. In three of the cases, POCUS significantly changed the patient's management. This article also describes the proper techniques for the emergency physician to learn to master POCUS for ureteral stone detection.

Symptomatic urolithiasis is a common cause of emergency department visits, with noncontrast computed tomography considered the imaging gold standard. According to current guidelines, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is limited to the evaluation of hydronephrosis as a secondary sign of acute ureteral stones. However, the use of POCUS to detect ureteral stones may lead to decreased radiation to the patient and a more rapid diagnosis. This case series describes 10 patients with suspected symptomatic urolithiasis who were diagnosed accurately by emergency physicians using POCUS to detect obstructive ureteral stones. In three of the cases, POCUS significantly changed the patient's management. This article also describes the proper techniques for the emergency physician to learn to master POCUS for ureteral stone detection.

Symptomatic urolithiasis is a common cause of emergency department visits, with noncontrast computed tomography considered the imaging gold standard. According to current guidelines, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is limited to the evaluation of hydronephrosis as a secondary sign of acute ureteral stones. However, the use of POCUS to detect ureteral stones may lead to decreased radiation to the patient and a more rapid diagnosis. This case series describes 10 patients with suspected symptomatic urolithiasis who were diagnosed accurately by emergency physicians using POCUS to detect obstructive ureteral stones. In three of the cases, POCUS significantly changed the patient's management. This article also describes the proper techniques for the emergency physician to learn to master POCUS for ureteral stone detection.

Symptomatic urolithiasis is a common cause of emergency department visits, with noncontrast computed tomography considered the imaging gold standard. According to current guidelines, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is limited to the evaluation of hydronephrosis as a secondary sign of acute ureteral stones. However, the use of POCUS to detect ureteral stones may lead to decreased radiation to the patient and a more rapid diagnosis. This case series describes 10 patients with suspected symptomatic urolithiasis who were diagnosed accurately by emergency physicians using POCUS to detect obstructive ureteral stones. In three of the cases, POCUS significantly changed the patient's management. This article also describes the proper techniques for the emergency physician to learn to master POCUS for ureteral stone detection.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the utility of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to identify and guide treatment of tamponade or clinically significant pericardial effusions in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of non-trauma patients who were diagnosed with large pericardial effusions or tamponade by the ED physician using POCUS. The control group was composed of those patients later diagnosed on the medical wards or incidentally in the ED by other means such as a computed tomography. The following data were abstracted from the patient’s file: demographics, medical background, electrocardiogram results, chest radiograph readings, echocardiogram results, and patient outcomes. RESULTS: There were 18 patients in the POCUS arm and 55 in the control group. The POCUS arm had a decreased time to pericardiocentesis (11.3 vs. 70.2 hours, P=0.055) as well as a shorter length of stay (5.1 vs. 7.0 days, P=0.222). A decreased volume of pericardial fluid was drained (661 vs. 826 mL, P=0.139) in the group diagnosed by POCUS. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that POCUS may effectively identify pericardial effusions and guide appropriate treatment, leading to a decreased time to pericardiocentesis and decreased length of hospital stay. Pericardial tamponade or a large pericardial effusion should be considered in all patients presenting to the ED with clinical, radiographic, or electrocardiographic signs of cardiovascular compromise.
Arm ; Cardiac Tamponade ; Cohort Studies ; Demography ; Electrocardiography ; Emergencies* ; Emergency Service, Hospital* ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Pericardial Effusion ; Pericardial Fluid ; Pericardiocentesis* ; Point-of-Care Systems* ; Radiography, Thoracic ; Reading ; Retrospective Studies ; Ultrasonography*