PURPOSE: While it is known that effective clinical education requires active involvement of its participants, regular feedback, communication skills and interprofessional training, limited studies have been conducted in Korea that demonstrate how pre-residency trainees acquire their core clinical skills. This is a cross-sectional study of interns and students across a third-tier university hospital in Korea to examine where and when they acquire core clinical skills. METHODS: A total of 74 students and 91 interns were asked to participate in a closed-ended questionnaire, and 50 participants (20 students and 30 interns) were involved in semistructured individual interviews. The questionnaire was based on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies. RESULTS: The majority of core clinical skills were acquired during their rotations in emergency medicine, general surgery and cardiothoracic surgery. The semistructured interviews revealed that these departments required their trainees to be highly involved and analytical, and participate in clinical discourse. CONCLUSION: The common factor among the three departments is an environment in which trainees are highly involved in clinical duties, and are expected to make first-contact patient encounters, participate in clinical discourse, interpret investigative results and arrive at their own conclusions. Work-based learning appear to be key to the trends observed, and further study is warranted to determine whether these findings are indicative of true acquisition of clinical competence.
Accreditation ; Clinical Competence* ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Education ; Education, Medical ; Education, Medical, Graduate ; Emergency Medicine ; Humans ; Korea ; Learning

PURPOSE: This study aims to review the appropriateness of the issued death certificates and autopsy reports and to evaluate the improvement points of these documents in accordance with the guidelines of the Korean Medical Association and the National Statistical Office. Moreover, this study also examines why the guideline is necessary for the credibility of these documents. METHODS: The death certificates and autopsy reports written by a training hospital were analyzed for a 12-month period, between December 2014 and November 2015. The reference to analysis was the “guidelines to medical certificate 2015” written by the Korean Medical Association, “World Health Organization (WHO) death certificate principle”, and “guideline leaflet,” as provided by the National Statistical Office. Two researchers analyzed the documents that were against the guidelines, and suggested improvement points. The analyzed variables were age, sex, issued date, direct cause of death, manner of death, location of death, and types of accident. The primary goal was to see the rate of issued documents written correctly according to the guidelines and to suggest possible improvement points. The secondary goal was to analyze the reason for accordance and discordance between researchers. RESULTS: There were a total of 603 death certificates and autopsy reports issued during the research period; 562 (93.2%) and 41 (6.8%) cases, respectively. As for the manner of death, 521 cases were “death from disease,” 64 were “external causes,” and 18 were “others or unknown” (86.4%, 10.6%, and 3.0%, respectively). As for the issued department, internal medicine and emergency medicine issued 301 (49.9%) and 126 (20.9%) documents, respectively. Of these, 139 (23.1%) cases were regarded to be in accordance with the guidelines, while 304 (50.4%) were considered to be discordant cases. Among the discordant cases, there were 177 (29.4%) cases that were the mode of death directly written to cause of death. As for the records of “period of occurrence to death” were recorded only 70 (11.7%) cases (including “unknown” 65 cases) and the others were blank. The Kappa number of analysis regarding the evaluation correspondence of the two researchers was 0.44 (95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.51). CONCLUSION: The most frequent error was ‘the condition of death to direct cause of death’ with the ratio of 29.4%. This may have been because the rate of concordance between the researchers based on the guidelines was not high enough. There is a need to provide specific guidelines for each case, and also promote and educate regarding significant errors.
Autopsy ; Cause of Death ; Death Certificates* ; Emergency Medicine ; Internal Medicine ; Medical Errors ; Observational Study*

BACKGROUND: It is important that proper protocols are in place for trauma patients who require massive transfusion upon arrival at the emergency department. This study is a preliminary analysis of massive transfusion cases at the emergency department of our institution aimed to review the characteristics and situations in which massive transfusion occurs in an effort to better manage trauma patients receiving massive transfusion in the emergency department. METHODS: This study was conducted at the Department of Emergency Medicine in the Korea University Guro Hospital. We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of trauma-related patients who required massive blood transfusions between January 2013 and December 2015. The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients who were over the age of 18 years and received more than 4 packed RBC (pRBC) units per hour, or 10 or more pRBC units during a period of 24-hours. RESULTS: A total of 669 patients were included in the study. There were significant differences of initial systolic blood pressure (P<0.0001), diastolic blood pressure (P<0.0001), and Injury Severity Score (P<0.0001) between those who survived and those who expired. CONCLUSION: Proper initial resuscitation is essential for the improvement of outcome in trauma patients that require a massive transfusion. The findings from this study may serve as preliminary data in developing proper transfusion protocols for massive transfusion among trauma patients.
Blood Pressure ; Blood Transfusion ; Emergencies* ; Emergency Medicine ; Emergency Service, Hospital* ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Korea ; Multiple Trauma ; Resuscitation ; Retrospective Studies ; Transfusion Reaction