1.Cricoid pressure: ritual or effective measure?
Nivan LOGANATHAN ; Eugene Hern Choon LIU
Singapore medical journal 2012;53(9):620-622
Cricoid pressure has been long used by clinicians to reduce the risk of aspiration during tracheal intubation. Historically, it is defined by Sellick as temporary occlusion of the upper end of the oesophagus by backward pressure of the cricoid cartilage against the bodies of the cervical vertebrae. The clinical relevance of cricoid pressure has been questioned despite its regular use in clinical practice. In this review, we address some of the controversies related to the use of cricoid pressure.
Cricoid Cartilage
;
physiology
;
Evidence-Based Medicine
;
Humans
;
Intubation, Intratracheal
;
methods
;
Pneumonia, Aspiration
;
prevention & control
;
Pressure
2.Safety and side effect profile of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination among healthcare workers: A tertiary hospital experience in Singapore.
See Ming LIM ; Hwang Ching CHAN ; Amelia SANTOSA ; Swee Chye QUEK ; Eugene Hern Choon LIU ; Jyoti SOMANI
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2021;50(9):703-711
INTRODUCTION:
Vaccination remains a key strategy to living endemically with COVID-19. The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was first granted interim authorisation for use in Singapore in December 2020. With overseas studies published about the safety and side effect profiles of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines focusing mainly on non-Asian populations, we described the side effects of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination experienced by the healthcare workers (HCWs) in a tertiary hospital in Singapore.
METHODS:
Data were obtained from the Occupational Health Clinic (OHC) at the National University Hospital in Singapore, which monitored staff for any adverse effects within 30 minutes post vaccination on-site and any adverse effects after that. A cross-sectional study among the vaccinated HCWs was conducted using an online survey, which established basic demographics, histories of allergies or atopic disorders, and adverse events encountered after dose 1 and dose 2 of vaccination.
RESULTS:
No anaphylaxis was reported. Most common symptom was giddiness (32.7%) experienced by HCWs within 30 minutes. Adverse events attended post-vaccination by OHC were generally mild and self-limiting. From the survey, odds of experiencing an adverse event after dose 2 was significantly higher than after the first dose, especially for fever/chills (odds ratio [OR] 22.5). Fever/chills, injection site reactions, headache, aches and pains, and feeling unwell were significantly more common in HCWs below 60 years compared to those ≥60 years. An allergy to food (adjusted OR 2.7) and a history of eczema/sensitive skin (adjusted OR 2.6) were associated with a skin reaction not at injection site.
CONCLUSION
The side effects experienced after Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines are generally self-limiting and mild, with no anaphylaxis reported.
COVID-19
;
COVID-19 Vaccines
;
Cross-Sectional Studies
;
Health Personnel
;
Humans
;
SARS-CoV-2
;
Singapore/epidemiology*
;
Tertiary Care Centers
;
Vaccination
3.How patients fare after anaesthesia for elective surgery: a survey of postoperative nausea and vomiting, pain and confusion.
Yun Zhi LEE ; Ruth Qianyi LEE ; Kyu Kyu THINN ; Keah How POON ; Eugene Hern LIU
Singapore medical journal 2015;56(1):40-46
INTRODUCTIONPostoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and postoperative pain are common during the early postoperative period. In addition to these problems, elderly patients risk developing postoperative confusion. This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with these problems, and the extent of these problems, in a Singapore inpatient surgical population.
METHODSOver a period of six weeks, we surveyed 707 elective surgical inpatients aged ≥ 18 years who received general anaesthesia and/or regional anaesthesia.
RESULTSThe incidence of PONV was 31.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 34.8-41.9). The incidence increased with increasing Apfel score (p < 0.001) and were higher in female patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.74, 95% CI 1.28-2.36), non-smokers (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.04-2.88), patients with a history of PONV and/or motion sickness (OR 3.45, 95% CI 2.38-5.24), patients who received opioids (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.03-1.88), and patients who received general anaesthesia (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.11-2.79). Moderate to severe pain at rest and with movement were reported in 19.9% and 52.5% of patients, respectively. Among the patients who were predicted to experience mild pain, 29.5% reported moderate pain and 8.1% reported severe pain. The prevalence of postoperative confusion was 3.9% in the geriatric population.
CONCLUSIONHigher Apfel scores were associated with a higher risk of PONV and multimodal treatment for postoperative pain management was found to be insufficient. The incidence of postoperative confusion was low in this study.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anesthesia, General ; adverse effects ; Confusion ; chemically induced ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Inpatients ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain, Postoperative ; drug therapy ; Postoperative Complications ; chemically induced ; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting ; chemically induced ; Postoperative Period ; Risk Factors ; Severity of Illness Index ; Sex Factors ; Singapore ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult