INTRODUCTION: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) has a heterogeneous disease course and a variable preva-lence across populations. Appropriate management for achieving optimal outcomes requires consideration of multiple factors, including disease-related factors like genomic alterations, patient characteristics and fitness, availability and access to treatments, and logistics/cost. This review aims to provide comprehen-sive and pragmatic recommendations for the management of treatment-naïve (TN) CLL that are relevant to Singapore's clinical context. METHOD: Clinical consensus statements were developed by an expert panel of haematologists from Singapore through a 2-round modified Delphi process. Statements were drafted using recent evidence-based guidelines and published literature. Panel members reviewed draft statements, provided anonymised feedback and proposed modifications where relevant. A physical meeting was held to facilitate discussion, voting and endorsement of the final consensus statements. RESULTS: The final consensus included 15 statements covering major TN CLL patient subsets. The recommendations highlight the importance of molecular testing for key biomarkers, where available/accessible, to guide initial therapy. Due to the superior efficacy of targeted agents (Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors [BTKis] and B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors [BCL2is]) these are favoured over standard chemotherapy or chemotherapy-immunotherapy, especially for patients with del(17p) or TP53 mutation, and less fit patients. CONCLUSION These consensus statements provide practical recommendations for the current manage-ment of TN CLL patients in Singapore and similar healthcare systems based on up-to-date evidence. Regular updates to treatment guidelines are important to ensure responsiveness to emerging evidence and evolving clinical practices and to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.
Humans ; Consensus ; Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/diagnosis* ; Singapore

INTRODUCTION: Three doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines have been recommended for cancer patients to reduce the risk of severe disease. Anti-neoplastic treatment, such as chemotherapy, may affect long-term vaccine immunogenicity. METHOD: Patients with solid or haematological cancer were recruited from 2 hospitals between July 2021 and March 2022. Humoral response was evaluated using GenScript cPASS surrogate virus neutralisation assays. Clinical outcomes were obtained from medical records and national mandatory-reporting databases. RESULTS: A total of 273 patients were recruited, with 40 having haematological malignancies and the rest solid tumours. Among the participants, 204 (74.7%) were receiving active cancer therapy, including 98 (35.9%) undergoing systemic chemotherapy and the rest targeted therapy or immunotherapy. All patients were seronegative at baseline. Seroconversion rates after receiving 1, 2 and 3 doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination were 35.2%, 79.4% and 92.4%, respectively. After 3 doses, patients on active treatment for haematological malignancies had lower antibodies (57.3%±46.2) when compared to patients on immunotherapy (94.1%±9.56, P<0.05) and chemotherapy (92.8%±18.1, P<0.05). SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported in 77 (28.2%) patients, of which 18 were severe. No patient receiving a third dose within 90 days of the second dose experienced severe infection. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the benefit of early administration of the third dose among cancer patients.
Humans ; SARS-CoV-2 ; COVID-19/prevention & control* ; Treatment Outcome ; Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Hematologic Neoplasms ; Vaccination ; RNA, Messenger ; Antibodies, Viral ; Immunogenicity, Vaccine

Acute Coronary Syndrome ; diagnosis ; Acute Disease ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Heart Ventricles ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Myocarditis ; diagnosis ; Ultrasonography ; Young Adult