PURPOSE: To compare the effect of medial rectus recession in consecutive esotropes who had previous monocular medial rectus resection and lateral rectus recession and in non- accommodative esotropes (NAET) with small angle of deviation who had no prior operation. METHODS: We studied the results of unilateral medial rectus recession at postoperative 2 and 6 months in 7 consecutive esotropes and 19 NAET with deviation angle around 20 PD, and analyzed the corrected amount for 1 mm medial rectus recession. We regarded deviated angle of+/-8 PD at orthophoria as successful operation. RESULTS: The abosolute value of remained deviation in consecutive esotropes and NAET were 4.86+/-5.67 PD and 9.05+/-3.95 PD at postoperative 2 months, and 5.42+/-7.89 PD and 8.26+/-4.45 PD at postoperative 6 months, respectively. There were significant differences between at postoperative 2 and 6 months (p<0.05). The success rates in consecutive esotropes and NAET at postoperative 2 months were 86% and 42%, and 71% and 47%, respectively at postoperative 6 months, which were no significant differences (p>0.05). The average amount of corrected deviation for 1 mm recession at postoperative 6 months was 5.84 PD in consecutive esotropes and 2.97 PD in NAET, which were significant differences (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Unilateral medial rectus recession in consecutive esotropes may be a useful and first choice of operation procedure when considering second operation. The amount of correction for 1 mm medial rectus recession is larger in consecutive esotropes than in NAET, possibly due to previous resection of medial rectus or release of fat adhesion. Therefore the amount of medial rectus recession in consecutive esotropia should be determined after considering the degree of abduction and operative findings.
Esotropia*

We analysed the results of residual esotropia with deviation of 15 to 35 prism diopters after a full correction with bimedial rectus recession and unilateral medial rectus recession. The remained mean deviation at postoperative 2 months was 6.17 prism diopters in unilateral MR recession group and 4.23 prism diopters in BMR recession group. The success rates were 75% in unilateral MR recession group and 87% in BMR recession group at postoperative 2 months, 56% in unilateral MR recession group and 89% in BMR recession group at postoperative 6 months. The difference of success rates in two groups at 2 months is not significant statistically but the success rate of BMR recession group at 6 months was higher than that of unilateral MR recession group significantly. There were no significant differences in success rate and residual deviation between the groups of nonaccomodative, partially accomodative esotropia, and all esotropias under 20 prism diopters. In conclusion, unilateral MR recession is considered as very useful surgical procedure in all kinds of esotropia under 20 prism diopters. But further study in the moderate degree esotropia over 20 prism diopters is need.
Esotropia*

No abstract available.
Esotropia

Twenty patients with small angle esotropia of 12 delta - 20 delta were treated with a unilateral medial rectus recession of 4.0 - 5.0mm. Eighteen of the 20 patients (90%) showed 8 delta or less horizontal deviations after surgery. The average amount of angle corrected with 4.0mm recession in 15 delta esotropia group was 15 delta, that with 4.5mm recesstion in 15 delta - 20 delta esotropia group was 14.8 delta and that with 4.5 - 5.0mm recession in 20 delta esotropia group was 15.2 delta. The average amount of angle corrected with 4.0mm, 4.5mm, 5.0mm recession were 12 delta, 15 delta and 14.6 delta respectively. The recession of one medial rectus muscle is a safe, predictable and simple procedure for the surgical treatmont of small angle esotropia.
Esotropia* ; Humans

Twenty patients with small angle esotropia of 12 delta - 20 delta were treated with a unilateral medial rectus recession of 4.0 - 5.0 mm. Eighteen of the 20 patients(90%) showed 8 delta or less horizontal deviations after surgery. The average amount of angle corrected with 4.0 mm recession in 15 delta esotropia group was 15 delta that with 4.5 mm recesstion in 15 delta - 20 delta esotropia group was 14.8 delta and that with 4.5 - 5.0 mm recession in 20 delta esotropia group was 15.2 delta. The average amount of angle corrected with 4.0 mm, 4.5 mm, 5.0 mm recession were 12 delta, 15 delta and 14.6 delta respectively. The recession of one medial rectus muscle is a safe, predictable and simple procedure for the surgical treatmont of small angle esotropia.
Esotropia* ; Humans

Objective: To compare the postoperative alignment of patients surgically corrected for esotropia or exotropia 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Method: This retrospective study reviewed clinical records of patients who underwent horizontal muscle surgery at the University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital from 2010 to 2014. The changes in alignment from 1 week to 6 weeks and from 1 week to 6 months after surgery were compared for overcorrection, undercorrection, and adequate correction groups. ANOVA and Pearson correlation were used. Results: Twenty two esotropia and 10 exotropia patients were included. Overcorrected esotropia patients had an esotropic change in alignment (15.50+13.44 PD after 6 weeks, p=0.026; 25+18.38 PD after 6 months, p=0.008). Under corrected esotropia patients had an exotropic change in alignment (-1.25+5.91 PD after 6 weeks, p=0.026;-4.38+14.16 PD after 6 months, p=0.008). Undercorrected exotropia patients had an esotropic change in alignment (6.67+6.35 PD after 6 weeks, p=0.028; 6+9.85 PD after 6 months, p=0.024). The presence of vertical deviations in esotropia caused an exotropic change in alignment after 6 months (p=0.03). Conclusion Although an exotropic drift is more commonly reported, fusional vergences may account for postoperative alignment changes towards orthotropia.
Esotropia ; Exotropia

Cyclic heterotropia represents an interesting ocular motility problem in which the ocular deviation is present on a rhythmic basis. Usually this appears in a regular 48-hour cycle, although 72-and 96-hour cycles have also been reported. On the strabismic day, constant heterotropia is large and associated with suppression and no diplopia. On the nonstrabismic day, no deviation or only a small heterophoria is present with good binocular function. In this paper, we present two cases of cyclic esotropia which demonstrated regular 48-hour cycles and were treated with surgery.
Diplopia ; Esotropia* ; Telescopes

PURPOSE: To evaluate of the effect of bilateral medial rectus recession in the patients who showed large angle (>50 prism diopters, PD) infantile esotropia as comparing small angle (esotropia. METHODS: The 68 patients who underwent bilateral medial rectus recession and followed up more than 6 month between 1998 to 2000 at Chung-nam university hospital, were reviewed. The success rate and reoperation rate were compared between large angle group (>50 PD, 14 patients) and small angle group (esotropia and 54 cases of small angle esotropia were reviewed. The success rate was 50.0% (7 of 14) in large angle and 59.26% (32 of 54) in small angle but statistical difference was not found (p=0.37). The reoperation rate was 35.71% (5 of 14) in large angle and 14.81% (8 of 54) in small angle but statistical difference was not found (p=0.12). CONCLUSIONS: The success rate and reoperation rate of bilateral medial rectus recession in large angle infantile esotropia were not different as compared with those of small angle infantile esotropia. So bilateral medial rectus recession is adequate to initial procedure in the treatment of large angle infantile esotropia.
Esotropia* ; Humans ; Reoperation

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the postoperative results of surgery for 60 patients with intermittent exotropia (20-30PD). METHODS: They were classified into two groups: one group with bilateral lateral rectus recession (n=34) and another group with unilateral medial rectus resection and lateral rectus recession (n=26). We assessed the postoperative results by comparing the deviation at postoperative 1 year to those at 1day, 1week, 1month, and 6months after surgery. RESULTS: The stisfactory result defined as orthophoria and deviation between 10PD esodeviation and 10PD exodeviation. The postoperative success rates are as follows: 65% in the bilateral rectus recession group and 62% in the unilateral lateral rectus muscle recession and medial rectus resection group. In the bilateral lateral rectus recession group, postoperative 1 day alignment of 11-15PD esodeviation showed the success rate of 83%. In the unilateral medial rectus resection and lateral rectus recession group, postoperative 1 day alignment of 1-5PD esodeviation resulted in the success rate of 80%. CONCLUSIONS: The initial postoperative esodevation of 11-15PD in bilateral lateral rectus recession and esodeviation of 1-5PD in unilateral medial rectus resection and lateral rectus recession can lead to good results. Postoperative 1 year surgical results for exotropia of moderate degree could be predicted from angle of deviation at postoperative 6 months, regardless of the type of surgery.
Esotropia ; Exotropia* ; Humans

PURPOSE: To investigate the factors associated with surgical success in cases of unilateral medial rectus resection and lateral rectus recession in the intermittent exotropia. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with basic-type intermittent exotropia were included in this study. They underwent unilateral recession of the lateral rectus and resection of the medial rectus muscle and were followed postoperatively for at least one year. Surgical results were analyzed to assess the association with preoperative factors, including the angle of deviation, difference of deviation between near and far, stereoacuity at far using B-VAT(R), and Worth 4 dot test (W4DT) at near, and postoperative factors, including the position at near and far at one week, stereoacuity at far using B-VAT(R) at one year, and W4DT at near and far. Surgical success was defined as esotropia within 5 prism diopters (PD) at near and far or within 10PD at near and far at one year postoperatively. RESULTS: Patients with a preoperative difference of deviation between near and far within 5PD had a better surgical outcome than patients with 6~10PD (p=0.03). There was a statistically significant relationship between position at one week postoperatively (especially esotropia or orthotropia at near and far) and success ratio (p<0.05). Other factors were not statistically related to surgical success (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The difference of preoperative deviation between near and far within 5PD and within 5PD esotropia and orthotropia at near and far at one week postoperatively were significantly associated with a good surgical outcome and could be good prognostic indicators.
Esotropia ; Exotropia* ; Humans