1.Transient Lower Esophageal Sphincter Relaxation and the Related Esophageal Motor Activities.
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2012;59(3):205-210
Transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation (TLESR) is defined as LES relaxation without a swallow. TLESRs are observed in both of the normal individuals and the patients with gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD). However, TLESR is widely considered as the major mechanism of the GERD. The new equipments such as high resolution manometry and impedance pH study is helped to understand of TLESR and the related esophageal motor activities. The strong longitudinal muscle contraction was observed during development of TLESR. Most of TLESRs are terminated by TLESR related motor events such as primary peristalsis and secondary contractions. The majority of TLESRs are associated with gastroesophageal reflux. Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) contraction is mainly associated with liquid reflux during recumbent position and UES relaxation predominantly related with air reflux during upright position. The frequency of TLESR in GERD patients seems to be not different compared to normal individuals, but the refluxate of GERD patients tend to be more acidic during TLESR.
Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/*physiology
;
Esophagogastric Junction/physiology
;
Esophagus/*physiology
;
Gastroesophageal Reflux/*physiopathology
;
Humans
;
Muscle Relaxation/physiology
2.Roles of diaphragmatic crural barrier and esophageal body clearance in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Xiao-hong SUN ; Mei-yun KE ; Zhi-feng WANG ; Xiu-cai FANG
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae 2002;24(3):289-293
OBJECTIVEAim of this study was to investigate functions of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) barrier and esophageal clearance in fasting and postprandial stages in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
METHODSEight patients with confirmed GERD and 8 healthy subjects (HS) were observed in the study. The esophageal pH and manometry were recorded simultaneously for 1 h during fasting and 2 h after a meal (1,675 kJ) using pneumohydrolic capillary perfusion system.
RESULTS(1) The esophageal pH monitoring showed that median of percentage of pH < 4 at postprandial in HS and patients with GERD was 0.45% and 11.2%, respectively (P < 0.05). (2) Pressure of lower esophageal sphincter (LESP) significantly decreased after a test meal in GERD (P < 0.001) and in HS (P < 0.001). (3) The amplitude of post-LES relaxation related to swallow (post-LESRA) in GERD was much lower than in HS either during fasting or postprandial stage (P < 0.05). (4) The tension of crural diaphragm at resting (Dia-A0) in GERD was lower than in HS during fasting and postprandial stage(P < 0.05). (5) The tension of crural diaphragm at deep inspiration (dia-AM) in GERD and HS increased 3 or 4 times at pressure at gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). (6) The peristaltic amplitude of the distal esophagus in GERD were much lower than that in HS in both pre- and postprandial periods.
CONCLUSIONS(1) Impaired clearance of Post-LESRA and esophageal body, function of diaphragmatic crural play an important role in development of GERD. (2) The tension of crural diaphragm at deep inspiration can increase the pressure at GEJ.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Diaphragm ; physiopathology ; Esophagogastric Junction ; physiopathology ; Esophagus ; physiopathology ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; physiopathology ; Humans ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Manometry ; Middle Aged ; Peristalsis
3.The functional relationships between hiatal hernia and reflux esophagitis.
Hyo Jin PARK ; Jong Doo LEE ; Jun Keun JUNG ; Byung Soo MOON ; Peter J COLLINS ; In Suh PARK
Yonsei Medical Journal 1996;37(4):278-283
The purpose of this research was to investigate functional studies by which the hiatal hernia (HH) may be relevant to a reflux esophagitis (RE). Group I consisted of healthy controls who were endoscopically normal (n = 21). Group II consisted of patients with hiatal hernia but no reflux esophagitis (n = 8). Group III had patients with hiatal hernia with reflux esophagitis (n = 9). Group IV had patients with reflux esophagitis but no hiatal hernia (n = 16). Esophageal manometry, ambulatory 24 hour intraesophageal pH monitoring, acid clearance test, and gastric emptying scan were performed in each of the patients. The contraction amplitude at 3 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter did not differ significantly among the four groups, but the mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure was significantly decreased in group II. The DeMeester score in ambulatory 24 hour intraesophageal pH monitoring was significantly higher in group III compared with the controls. No significant difference among the groups was found with respect to acid clearance. Total and proximal gastric emptying times (T1/2) were significantly delayed in group III. We found that hiatal hernia combined with delayed gastric emptying may bear a relationship to the multifactorial origins of reflux esophagitis, and we suggest a rationale for using prokinetic agents as the therapeutic regimen in patients with HH complicated by RE.
Adult
;
Esophagitis, Peptic/*etiology/metabolism/physiopathology
;
Esophagogastric Junction/physiopathology
;
Esophagus/metabolism
;
Female
;
Hernia, Hiatal/*complications/physiopathology
;
Human
;
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
;
Male
;
Manometry
;
Pressure
4.Radiofrequency treatment on respiratory symptoms due to gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Xiang GAO ; Zhong-Gao WANG ; Ji-Min WU ; Feng JI ; Cheng-Chao ZHANG ; Ya-Chan NING ; Zhi-Tong LI ; Zhi-Wei HU ; Xiu CHEN ; Shu-Rui TIAN
Chinese Medical Journal 2011;124(7):1006-1009
BACKGROUNDDiagnosis and treatment for respiratory symptoms (RSs) of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is more difficult than that for common esophageal symptoms. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency (RF) treatment on RSs of GERD in a preliminary 12-month follow-up observation.
METHODSFrom April 2006 to October 2008, 505 GERD patients with mainly respiratory presentations such as wheezing, chronic cough or hoarseness, were treated by endoscopic RF. A questionnaire was completed before and after treatment, using a six-point scale ranging from 0 to 5 to assess symptom severity and frequency. The symptom score was the sum of frequency and severity.
RESULTSSymptom scores were significantly improved at the end of the follow-up period. The mean heartburn score decreased from 5.31 to 1.79. The mean regurgitation score decreased from 5.02 to 1.64; mean cough score decreased from 6.77 to 2.85; mean wheezing score decreased from 7.83 to 3.07; and mean hoarseness score decreased from 5.13 to 1.81 (P < 0.01). No major complications or deaths occurred. Minor complications included temporary post-procedural retrosternal unease or pain (n = 106; 21.0%), mild fever (n = 86; 17.0%), transient nausea/vomiting (n = 97; 19.2%), and transient dysphagia (n = 42; 9.3%). Thirty-five (6.9%) patients had recurrence of symptoms. Endoscopic RF treatment was repeated in six patients, and laparoscopic fundoplication was performed in seven.
CONCLUSIONEndoscopic RF is an effective and safe means to treat RSs in patients with GERD.
Adult ; Aged ; Cough ; surgery ; Esophagogastric Junction ; physiopathology ; radiation effects ; Esophagoscopy ; methods ; Female ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Heartburn ; surgery ; Hoarseness ; surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radio Waves ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult