BACKGROUND/AIMS: Low-dose aspirin therapy is widely used to prevent cardiovascular thrombotic events. However, the safety of low-dose aspirin therapy in the gastrointestinal tract is uncertain. Our aim was to evaluate endoscopic findings in patients taking low-dose aspirin. METHODS: Sixty-two patients who received 100 mg enteric coated aspirin daily more than 30 days were included in this study. Patients' medical records and endoscopic data were reviewed retrospectively. As controls, 70 of age- and gender-matched patients who received an endoscopy without gastrointestinal symptoms were employed. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of gastroduodenal mucosal injury was higher in the aspirin group than in the control group. Erosive gastritis was noted more frequently in the aspirin group than in the control group. However, the prevalence of ulcer was not different between the aspirin group and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with low-dose aspirin therapy are more likely to have endoscopic evidence of mucosal damage. Our study suggests that even a low-dose aspirin therapy can induce a gastroduodenal mucosal injury. In the future, a prospective randomized control study is needed.
Aged ; Aspirin/administration & dosage/*adverse effects ; Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control ; Esophagitis/chemically induced ; Female ; Gastritis/chemically induced ; Gastrointestinal Diseases/*chemically induced ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage/*adverse effects ; Tablets, Enteric-Coated/adverse effects

Carcinosarcoma of the esophagus is a rare malignancy accounting for approximately 1-2% of all esophageal neoplasms. It presents as a bulky intraluminal polypoid lesion mainly in the mid to lower esophagus, which harbors both carcinomatous and sarcomatous components histologically. It often presents relatively early because of its rapid intraluminal growth. We report the case of a 69-year-old man who had suffered from dysphagia for 1 month. He was previously admitted to the hospital due to corrosive esophagitis caused by ingestion of acetic acid. Endoscopy and radiological studies revealed a bulky polypoid mass with superficial ulcerations and mucosal friability, measuring 10 cm in length approximately, in the mid-esophagus. Subtotal esophagectomy with esophagogastrostomy was done. Microscopically it was composed of sarcomatous component intermingled with squamous cell carcinoma. Immunohistochemical stains reveal cytokeratin, 34betaE12, and p63 positivity in the nests of carcinoma, and desmin and vimentin positivity in the spindle cells of sarcomatous stoma.
Aged ; Carcinosarcoma/*diagnosis/pathology/surgery ; Esophageal Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/surgery ; Esophagectomy ; Esophagitis/chemically induced ; Humans ; Male ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Tumor Markers, Biological/immunology

UNLABELLEDOBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiation with paclitaxel and platinum and external irradiation, and to compare the effect of extensive regional field irradiation with conventional local field irradiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODSFrom Oct. 2000 to Jan. 2006, 89 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer were registered in this study. All patients were inoperable or refused to undergo operation. Patients were divided into two groups: extensive regional field group (51 patients) and conventional field group (38 patients). Patients received radiotherapy at a total dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions within 7 weeks,and concurrent paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on D1, cisplatin 20 mg/m2 on D1-D3, or oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on D2 in the fist and fourth week of external radiation.

RESULTSOf these patients, 87.6% completed the treatment regimen with a response rate of 75.5% and 66.7% in the extensive regional field group and conventional field group, respectively. Grade 3 or severe toxicities of leucopenia (33.3% vs. 23.7%), thrombocytopenia (76.0% vs. 2.6%), and esophagitis (17.7% vs. 26.3%) were observed in extensive regional field group and conventional field group, respectively. Major late toxic effect was lung fibrosis. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of the toxicity profile between two groups. The overall 3-year survival rates was 32.8%, and the overall 3-year recurrence and metastasis-free survival rates was 34.5%. The overall 3-year locoregional control rate was 44.0%. No significant difference was found between two groups in the 3-year survival (38.2% % vs. 28.1%, P = 0.59). For the patients with stage II and stage III cancers who completed the planned treatment, large regional field radiotherapy significantly improved the 3-year survival (57.3% vs. 22.2% , P = 0.03) or 3-year recurrent and metastasis-free survival (55.5% vs. 23.0%, P = 0.03) or 3-year locoregional control (65.9% vs. 30.2%, P = 0.02) than conventional field radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONhistorical results, the combination of paclitaxel/platinum and radiation in this study can improve the survival for locally advanced esophageal, and the side effect is well tolerated. Compared with the conventional field group, concurrent chemoradiotherapy with the large regional field can significantly improve 3-year survival and locoregional control for stage II or stage III esophageal cancer.

Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ; drug therapy ; pathology ; radiotherapy ; Cisplatin ; administration & dosage ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; pathology ; radiotherapy ; Esophagitis ; chemically induced ; etiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Leukopenia ; chemically induced ; etiology ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm Staging ; Organoplatinum Compounds ; administration & dosage ; Paclitaxel ; administration & dosage ; Particle Accelerators ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy, High-Energy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Remission Induction ; Survival Rate ; Thrombocytopenia ; chemically induced ; etiology

Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ; drug therapy ; radiotherapy ; Cisplatin ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; radiotherapy ; Esophagitis ; etiology ; Female ; Fluorouracil ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Organoplatinum Compounds ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ; adverse effects ; Remission Induction ; Survival Rate ; Taxoids ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Vomiting ; chemically induced

OBJECTIVETo retrospectively compare the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (RT) alone with that of postoperative radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy (CRT) for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (EPC) with positive lymph nodes, and to evaluate the clinical value of RT + CRT.

METHODS304 EPC patients underwent esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection had pathological lymph node metastases, but no hematogenous distant metastasis. Among them, 140 cases underwent postoperative RT alone, and 164 cases underwent postoperative CRT. The dose of irradiation was 50 Gy, and the chemotherapy regimen was taxol and cis-platinum, and a cycle was 21 days.

RESULTSThe 1-, 3- and 5-year total survival rates of the whole group were 90.1%, 56.6% and 43.3%, respectively, with a median survival time of 49.7 months. The 5-year overall survival rates of the CRT and RT groups were 47.4% and 38.6%, respectively (P = 0.030), with a median survival time of 53.5 and 41.7 months, respectively (P = 0.030). The overall survival rates of the patients who underwent 1, 2, 3, 4 cycles of chemotherapy were 24.4%, 53.0%, 58.1% and 43.3%, respectively (P = 0.007). Among them, the 5-year total survival rate of patients with 2-4 cycles of chemotherapy was significantly better than that of patients who underwent one cycle of chemotherapy (P = 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that number of metastatic lymph nodes, pT stage, therapeutic regimen and number of chemotherapy cycles were significantly correlated with the prognosis of the patients (P < 0.05 for all). Multivariate analysis showed that number of metastatic lymph nodes, pT stage, and number of chemotherapy cycles were independent prognostic factors of the patients (P < 0.05 for all). Early toxic effects including neutropenia, radiation esophagitis, and gastrointestinal effects were significantly more severe in the CRT group than that in the RT group (P < 0.05), however, there were no significant differences of late toxic effects between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONPostoperative CRT for thoracic EPC with positive lymph nodes can improve the survival rate, with tolerable adverse effects.

Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ; drug therapy ; pathology ; radiotherapy ; surgery ; Chemoradiotherapy ; adverse effects ; Cisplatin ; administration & dosage ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; pathology ; radiotherapy ; surgery ; Esophagectomy ; Esophagitis ; etiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymphatic Irradiation ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Neutropenia ; chemically induced ; etiology ; Paclitaxel ; administration & dosage ; Particle Accelerators ; Postoperative Period ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate